Advertisement

Lumped Mass Model of a 1D Metastructure with Vibration Absorbers with Varying Mass

  • Katherine K. Reichl
  • Daniel J. Inman
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

This work examines the distribution of vibration absorber mass for a lumped mass metastructure model designed to suppress vibrations in the axial direction. Metastructures, a metamaterial inspired concept, are structures with distributed vibration absorbers. In automotive and aerospace industries, it is critical to have low levels of vibrations while also using lightweight materials. Previous work has shown that this design can effectively reduce vibrations by comparing the response of the metastructure to a structure with no vibration absorbers but with equal mass. Previous work constrained the vibration absorber masses to be the same throughout the structure. This work looks at the added performance that can be realized by allowing these masses to varying throughout the length of the metastructure. Additionally, the performance of the metastructure is also compared a host structure with a single tuned mass damper to show how this new technology differs from traditional vibration suppression methods.

Keywords

Metastructures Vibration suppression Passive damping Tuned mass dampers Metamaterials 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research under the grant number FA9550-14-1-0246 “Electronic Damping in Multifunctional Material Systems” monitored by Dr. BL Lee and in part by the University of Michigan.

References

  1. 1.
    Laszlo, S., Shamonina, E.: Waves in metamaterials. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ziolkowski, R.W., Engheta, N.: Introduction, history and selected topics in fundamental theories of metamateraials. In: Engheta, N., Ziolkowski, R.W. (eds.) Metamaterials: physics and engineering explorations, pp. 1–41. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cummer, S.A., Christensen, J., Alù, A.: Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16001 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martínez-Sala, R., Sancho, J., Sánchez, J.V., Gómez, V., Llinares, J., Meseguer, F.: Sound attenuation by sculpture. Nature. 378, 241 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hussein, M.I., Leamy, M.J., Ruzzene, M.: Dynamics of phononic materials and structures: historical origins, recent progress, and future outlook. Appl. Mech. Rev. 66, 40802 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milton, G.W., Willis, J.R.: On modifications of Newton’s second law and linear continuum elastodynamics. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 463, 855–880 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2006.1795 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Mao, Y., Zhu, Y.Y., Yang, Z., Chan, C.T., Sheng, P.: Locally resonant sonic materials. Science. 289(80), 1734–1736 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, R., Liu, X.N., Hu, G.K., Yuan, F.G., Huang, G.L.: Microstructural designs of plate-type elastic metamaterial and their potential applications: a review. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 6, 14–40 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2015.1025249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soto, M.G., Adeli, H.: Tuned mass dampers. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 20, 419–431 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-013-9091-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reichl, K.K., Inman, D.J.: Lumped mass model of a 1D metastructure for vibration suppression with no additional mass. J. Sound Vib. 403, 75–89 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine K. Reichl
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Inman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations