A Method and Model for Studying the Learning of Body Techniques: Analyzing Bodily Transposition in Dinghy Sailing
This chapter introduces the SER model and PEA method as elaborated tools to empirically answer three paradigmatic questions about learning: (a) how learning is connected to continuity and change, (b) what constitutes learning, and (c) what influences learning. The SER model draws on Dewey’s theory of inquiry and the distinctions between anoetic experience, significant and immanent meaning while the first-person perspective and transactionalism is used to provide a primarily transactional understanding of PEA. This framework is then applied to the mobility practice of dinghy sailing and an empirical analysis that explains the process and content of learning the body technique of roller-tacking is employed. In so doing, the SER model provides descriptions and explanations regarding learning processes and products from data collected using PEA.
KeywordsAnoetic experience Transactionalism Sailing Roller-tacking
- Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2006). Privileging and artifacts: On the use of information technology in science education. Interchange, 37(3), 225–250.Google Scholar
- Altman, B., & Rogoff, B. (1987). Worldviews in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 7–40). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cavell, S. (1999). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality and tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fann, K. T. (1993). Ludwig Wittgenstein. En introduktion. Göteborg: Daidalos. (Original work published 1969. Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
- Fogel, A. (2009). What is transaction? In A. Sameroff (Ed.), The transactional model of development (pp. 271–280). Washington, DC: Americano Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Gendlin, E. (1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning – A philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
- Gould, D. (2010). On affect and protest. In J. Staiger, A. Cvetkovich, & A. Reynolds (Eds.), Political emotions: New agendas in communication (pp. 18–44). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hedberg, J. (1999). Exit, segling i små båtar: dokumentär av en döende art (Exit, small boat sailing: a documentary about a dying art). Norway: Exit bokförlag.Google Scholar
- Hofverberg, H., & Maivorsdotter, N. (2017). Recycling, crafting and learning – An empirical analysis of how students learn with garments and textile refuse in a school remake project. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1338672.
- James, W. (1907/1975). Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. AMC, 10, 12.Google Scholar
- Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, (31), 83–109.Google Scholar
- Monk, R. (1991). Ludwig Wittgenstein – The duty of genius. London: Cape.Google Scholar
- Östman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (2001). Practical epistemology, learning and socialisation. Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.Google Scholar
- Pepper, SC. (1942/1970). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth, Philosophical papers (Vol. I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sameroff, A. (Ed.). (2009). The transactional model of development: How children and context shape each other. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Shilling, C. (2016). Body pedagogics: Embodiment, cognition and cultural transmission. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516641868.
- Shilling, C. (2017). Embodying culture: Body pedagogics, situated encounters and empirical research. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117716630.
- Stenlund, S. (2000). Filosofiska uppsatser [Philosophical essays]. Skellefteå: Norma.Google Scholar
- Stokols, D. (1988). Transformational processes in people-environment relations. In J. E. MacGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time (pp. 233–252). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, S. (2001). Living across and through skins. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Van Poeck, K., & Östman, L. (2017). Creating space for ‘the political’ in environmental and sustainability education practice: A political move analysis of educators’ actions. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1306835.
- Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2001). Students’ practical epistemologies during laboratory work. Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.Google Scholar