Public Administration Leaders as Institutional Entrepreneurs: Dispute over the Location of a Marketplace
Interpretation of this case is built around the role of individuals and, specifically, of intra-organizational leaders in the processes of institutionalization and learning of new governance patterns. The analysis illustrates that even in the face of complex problems and public pressure for inclusion of external stakeholders, the shift from government to governance is neither obvious nor necessary. As the old, hierarchical ways remain the default option, whether the new way of governing will be enacted depends solely on the mobilization and purposive efforts of institutional entrepreneurs acting within the organizational structures of the administration.
KeywordsInstitutional entrepreneur Institutional void Leadership
- Osborne, Stephen, and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming Public Sector. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Pierre, Jon, and B. Guy Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Selznick, Philipp. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Washington, M., Kimberly Boal, and John Davis. 2008. Institutional Leadership: Past, Present, and Future. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. R. Suddaby, K. Sahlin-Andersson, C. Oliver, and R. Greenwood, 719–733. London: Sage.Google Scholar