Advertisement

What’s New? Temporality in Practice Theory and Pragmatism

  • Anders Buch
  • Iben Sandal Stjerne
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses two temporal approaches to social order that accentuate the role of novelty, change and temporality in accounts of social organization, activity and human action, namely, the pragmatist approach of George Herbert Mead and the practice theoretical approach of Theodore R. Schatzki. The chapter investigates how they conceive of novelty in their theoretical accounts. With this in mind, an empirical case from an organizational setting in the creative industry is introduced: the production of the film Antboy. To illustrate the points about novelty, the case is discussed with the conceptual resources put at our disposal by the two approaches to better understand how organizing for the future can in fact accommodate the processes of creativity that bring about novelty.

References

  1. Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baert, Patrick. 1992. Time, Self, and Social Being. Temporality Within the Sociological Context. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, Howard S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buch, Anders, and Bente Elkjær. 2015. Pragmatism and Practice Theory. Convergences or Collisions. Paper Presented at the Conference of Organizational Learning, Knowledge, and Capabilities (OLKC2015), Milan, April 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Buch, Anders, and Theodore Schatzki. forthcoming. Questions of Practice in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Caniëls, M.C.J., and E.F. Rietzschel. 2015. Organizing Creativity: Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management 24: 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chia, Robert. 2017. A Process-Philosophical Understanding of Organizational Learning as ‘Wayfinding’: Process, Practices, and Sensitivity to Environmental Affordances. The Learning Organization 24 (2): 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson, Patrick, and Christopher Sykes. 2016. Organizational Change and Temporality. Bending the Arrow of Time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, John. 1920/2008. In Reconstruction in Philosophy, The Middle Works, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 1938. Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  11. Garud, Raghu, Barbara Simpson, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2016. The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1997. G. H. Mead. A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, C., M. Maoret, F. Massa, and S. Svejenova. 2012. Rebels with a Cause: Formation of the De Novo Category ‘Modern Architecture’. Organization Science 23: 1523–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lampel, J., T. Lant, and J. Shamsie. 2000. Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in Cultural Industries. Organization Science 11: 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Langley, Ann, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Mead, George Herbert. 1932/2002. The Philosophy of the Present. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1934/1962. In Mind, Self, and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. C.W. Morris. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1938/1972. The Philosophy of the Act, ed. C.W. Morris et al. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Okrent, Mark. 1991. Heidegger’s Pragmatism. Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ortmann, Günter, and Jörg Sydow. 2017. Dancing in Chains: Creative Practices in/of Organizations. Organization Studies. Online First, August 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosso, Brent D. 2014. Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies 35: 551–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rouse, Joseph. 2017. Normativity. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind, ed. Julian Kieverstein, 545–562. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Sawyer, R. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schatzki, Theodore. 2002. The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2010. The Timespace of Human Activity. On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2016. Practice Theory as Flat Ontology. In Practice Theory and Research. Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, ed. Gert Spaargaren, Don Weenink, and Machiel Larmers, 28–42. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. ———. forthcoming. On Plural Actions. In Practice, Practices, and Pragmatism. Perspectives from Philosophy and the Social Sciences, ed. Anders Buch and Theodore Schatzki. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Stjerne, Iben. 2016. Transcending Organization in Temporary Systems. Aesthetics’ Organizing Work and Employment in Creative Industries. PhD Series 50.2016, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
  30. Stjerne, Iben, and Silviya Svejenova. 2016. Connecting Temporary and Permanent Organizing. Tensions and Boundary Work in a Series of Film Projects. Organization Studies 37 (12): 1771–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Svec, Ondrej, and Jakub Capek. 2017. Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Urry, John. 2016. What Is the Future? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wijnberg, N., and G. Gemser. 2000. Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts. Organization Science 11: 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Buch
    • 1
  • Iben Sandal Stjerne
    • 2
  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Strategic Management and GlobalizationCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations