Quality Control Results for Linear Accelerator at Oncology Center in Nouakchott

  • Ahmed El Mouna Ould Mohamed Yeslem
  • Moussa Ould Cheibetta
  • Jilali Ghassoun
  • Oum Keltoum Hakam
  • Slimane Semghouli
  • Abdelmajid Choukri
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 37)

Abstract

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the treatment of malignant tumour. The quality control for linear accelerator is one of the keys to ensure the correct and safe implementation of accurate radiotherapy.

The National Center of Oncology in Nouakchott is equipped with a linear accelerator which provides two energies in photon regime 6 MV and 18 MV.

The aim of this work is to measure the percentage depth dose (PDD) by two different ionization chambers: PTW 0.125 cm3 and PTW 0.6 cm3 and to compare the measured results with the results calculated by Treatment Planning Systems (TPS).

For the energy of 6 MV beam photon and for different dimensions of the field size, we have measured the percentage depth dose by two ionization chambers PTW 0,125 cm3 and PTW 0,6 cm3.

From these results, we have plotted the curves of the PDD and the relative deviation.

We compared the measurements of the percentage depth dose by the two ionization chambers.

We have found that the results obtained are consistent with those calculated by TPS.

There was note a slight difference between the depths measured by the two ionization chambers (PTW 0,125 cm3 and PTW 0, 6 cm3 chamber) and also that the latter is related to the field size.

Keywords

Quality control PTW 0.125 cm3 and PTW 0.6 cm3 (TPS) Linear accelerator 

References

  1. 1.
    Roy, M.L.: Study of national dosimetric standards for external beam radiotherapy: application to conformal irradiations. University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blazy-Aubignac, L.: Quality control of the treatment planning systems dose calculations in external radiation therapy using the penelope Monte-Carlo code. University of Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenwald, J.C., Bonvalet, L., Mazurier, J., Métayer, C.: Recommandations pour la mise en service et l’utilisation d’un système de planification de traitement en radiothérapie (TPS), RAPPORT SFPM N° 27 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding, G.X.: Energy spectra, angular spread, fluence profiles and dose distributions of 6 and 18 MV photon beams: results of Monte Carlo simulations for a Varian 2100EX accelerator. Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 1025–1046 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Purdy, J.A.: Buildup/surface dose and exit dose measurements for 6 MV linear accelerator. Med. Phys. 13, 259–262 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engler, M.J., Jones, G.L.: Small beam calibration by 0.6 and 0.2 cm3 ionization chambers. Med. Phys. 11, 822–826 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Villani, N., Gérard, K., Marchesi, V., Huger, S., François, P., Noël, A.: Statistical process control applied to intensity modulated radiotherapy pretreatment controls with portal dosimetry. Cancer/Radiothérapie 14, 189–197 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coffey II, C.W., Beach, J.L., Thompson, D.J., Mendiondo, M.: Xray beam characteristics of the Varian Clinac 6100 linear accelerator. Med. Phys. 7, 716–722 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKerracher, C., Thwaites, D.I.: Assessment of new small-field detectors against standard-field detectors for practical stereotactic beam data acquisition. Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 2143–2160 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krithivas, G., Rao, S.N.: A study of the characteristics of radiation contaminants within a clinically useful photon beam. Med. Phys. 12, 764–768 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science FacultyKenitraMorocco
  2. 2.National Oncology CentreNouakchottMauritania
  3. 3.Sciences Faculty of SemlaliaMarrakechMorocco
  4. 4.Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health TechniquesAgadirMorocco

Personalised recommendations