Advertisement

Effectiveness of Impact-Investing at the Base of the Pyramid: An Empirical Study from India

  • Anirudh Agrawal
Chapter

Abstract

The availability of essential public goods like subsidized education, health care, vocation training, sustainable development and inexpensive microfinance, which are reliable and affordable, is one of the critical challenges stalling the progress of the developing economies. These challenges are further aggravated at the base of the pyramid (BoP). Realizing these critical issues, the impact investment has emerged as a new asset class, which has bundled entrepreneurial passion with available scarce resources to design and implement cost-effective, reliable and scalable market solutions for the BoP creating essential public goods. The empirical context involves the use of case studies of impact-investing firms, which have made a socio-economic difference in the lives of the rural and semi-urban population lying at the BoP in India through impact investments in social enterprises. The analysis and findings reflect the key operating principles of favourable impact-investing in the business ventures at the BoP. These include a focus on the affordability of services, innovation and cost control, local engagement and stakeholder management, local skills and capability building, dynamic leadership and scalability.

Keywords

Base of the pyramid UN MDGs Low-income markets Emerging markets Impact investment Developing countries Sustainable development 

References

  1. Akula, V. (2009). Business basics at the bottom of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 86, 53–57.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, D. G., & Valentin, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1904–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom, P. N., & Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Scaling social entrepreneurial impact. California Management Review, 51(3), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bugg-Levine, A., & Goldstein, J. (2009). Impact investing: Harnessing capital markets to solve problems at scale. Community Development Investment Review, 5(2), 30–41.Google Scholar
  6. CRISIL Inclusix. (2015). CRISIL Inclusix: An index to measure India’s progress on financial inclusion. Chennai, India.Google Scholar
  7. Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012). Empowering women through social entrepreneurship: Case study of a women’s cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00505.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desa, G., & Koch, J. L. (2014). Scaling social impact: Building sustainable social ventures at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 146–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  10. Esposito, M., Kapoor, A., & Goyal, S. (2012). Enabling healthcare services for the rural and semi-urban segments in India: When shared value meets the bottom of the pyramid. Corporate Governance, 12(4), 514–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211267847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, M. (2013). Meeting the challenge of impact investing: How can contracting practices secure social impact without sacrificing performance? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(2), 138–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FICCI. (2015). Skill development in India. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  13. Gaertner, K., & Ishikawa, E. (2014). Shared prosperity through inclusive business: How successful companies reach the base of the pyramid. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrette, B., & Karnani, A. (2009). Challenges in marketing socially useful goods to the poor. California Management Review, 52(4), 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Government of India Ministry. (2010). Employment & unemployment survey (2009–10). Chandigarh.Google Scholar
  17. Hammond, A. L., Kramer, W. J., Katz, R. S., Tran, J. T., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion, characterizing BoP markets. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(1–2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2007.2.1-2.147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hangl, C. (2014). A literature review about the landscape of social finance. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 3(4), 64–98.Google Scholar
  19. Harji, K., & Hebb, T. (2010). Impact investing for social finance. In ANSER Conference (pp. 1–20).Google Scholar
  20. Harjula, L. (2006). Tensions between venture capitalists’ and business-social entrepreneurs’ goals. Greener Management International, 51, 79–87.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 6–51.Google Scholar
  22. Haub, C., & Sharma, O. P. (2010). What is poverty, really? The case of India. Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  23. Heinecke, A., Achleitner, A., & Spiess-knafl, W. (2011). Social Investment Manual: An Introduction for Social Entrepreneurs. Munich. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1884338
  24. Hibbert, S. A., Hogg, G., & Quinn, T. (2002). Consumer response to social entrepreneurship: The case of the Big Issue in Scotland. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids—Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hummels, H., & de Leede, M. (2014). The emergence of impact investments: The case of microfinance. In W. Sun (Ed.), Socially responsible investment in the 21st century: Does it make a difference for society? Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability (pp. 91–115). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  27. Kabir, M. S., Hou, X., Akther, R., Wang, J., & Wang, L. (2012). Impact of small entrepreneurship on sustainable livelihood assets of rural poor women in Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics & Finance, 4(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n3p265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalam, A. P. J., & Singh, S. P. (2011). Target 3 billion: PURA: Innovative solutions towards sustainable development. India: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  29. Kapoor, A., & Goyal, S. (2013). Inclusive healthcare at base of the pyramid (BoP) in India. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 6(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2013.051547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karnani, A. (2009). The bottom of the pyramid strategy for reducing poverty: A failed promise (DESA working paper No. 80, ST/ESA/2009/DWP/80). New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  31. Lucci, P. (2012). Post-2015 MDGs: What role of business? London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Mair, J., Martí, I., & Canly, K. (2007). Institutional voids as spaces of opportunity. European Business Forum, 31, 34–39.Google Scholar
  33. Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McHugh, N., Sinclair, S., Roy, M., Huckfield, L., & Donaldson, C. (2013). Social impact bonds: A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674313X13812372137921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, T. L., & Wesley, C. L. (2010). Assessing mission and resources for social change: An organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists’ decision criteria. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 705–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00388.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Milligan, K., & Schöning, M. (2011). Taking a realistic approach to impact investing: Observations from the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, M.-L., Westley, F. R., & Nicholls, A. (2012). The social finance and social innovation nexus. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.725824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicholls, A. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420671003701257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1999). Philanthropy’s new agenda: Creating value. Harvard Business Review, 77(6), 121–130.Google Scholar
  40. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  41. Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002, September). Serving the world’s poor profitably. Harvard Business Review, 10.Google Scholar
  43. Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (1999). Strategies for the bottom of the pyramid: Creating sustainable development (draft). Retrieved from http://www.bus.tu.ac.th/usr/wai/xm622/conclude%20monsanto/strategies.pdf (Draft).
  44. Sahasranamam, S., & Agrawal, A. (2016). Corporate social entrepreneurship in India. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5(2), 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scholtens, B., & Sievänen, R. (2013). Drivers of socially responsible investing: A case study of four Nordic countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1410-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Sustainable development, sustainable profit. European Business Forum, 20, 49–53.Google Scholar
  47. Shukla, S., & Bairiganjan, S. (2011). The base of the pyramid distribution challenge: Evaluating alternative models of energy products for rural base of pyramid in India. Chennai, India.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, P., & Haigh, M. (2011). The Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, (September 2014), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2011.582330
  49. Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2007). Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(5), 667–685.Google Scholar
  50. UN. (2012). The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  51. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oak: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Yunus, M., & Jolis, A. (1999). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  53. Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anirudh Agrawal
    • 1
  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations