Advertisement

Why Worry About Your Impact? Rationale, Challenges and Support for Indian Social Enterprises’ Impact Measurement

  • Anar Bhatt
Chapter

Abstract

For social enterprises, the impact assessment practice can serve as an important differentiator from its commercial competitors, particularly while attracting impact-focused capital. The development and implementation of impact assessment tools for social enterprises have piqued the interest of academicians as much as it has challenged the practitioners. Followed by a discussion of how social impact is conceptualized in theory, this chapter studies the actual tools used by social enterprises in practice. Recognizing that the interdependence between social enterprises and their funders is deeper as compared with other stakeholders, the chapter details the various tools developed by and for impact investors. It also reviews the challenges and the support available for impact assessment for social enterprises in India.

Keywords

Impact assessment Social impact Social enterprises Impact investments 

References

  1. Adams, T., Gawande, R., & Overdyke, S. (2015). Innovations in impact measurement: Lessons using mobile technology from Acumen’s Lean Data initiative and Root Capital’s Client-Centric Mobile Measurement. Retrieved from http://acumen.org/ideas/lean-data/
  2. Allen, S., Bhatt, A., Ganesh, U., & Kulkarni, N. (2012). On the path to sustainability and scale: A study of India’s social enterprise landscape. Mumbai: Intellecap.Google Scholar
  3. B-Analytics. (2017). GIIRS funds. Retrieved from B-Analytics: http://b-analytics.net/giirs-funds
  4. Bacq, S., Hartog, C., & Hoogendoorn, B. (2016). Beyond the moral portrayal of social entrepreneurs: An empirical approach to who they are and what drives them. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barraket, J., & Yousefpour, N. (2013). Evaluation and social impact measurement amongst small to medium social enterprises: Process, purpose and value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4), 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassi, A., & Vincenti, G. (2015). Toward a new metrics for the evaluation of the social added value of social enterprises. CIRIEC—España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 83, 9–42.Google Scholar
  7. British Council. (2016). The state of social enterprise in Bangladesh, Ghana, India, and Pakistan: The state of social enterprise in India. British Council.Google Scholar
  8. Catalyst Management Services. (2016). Impact measures. Retrieved from The Catalyst Management Services: http://www.cms.org.in/services-impact-measures
  9. Cecilia, G., Michelini, L., & Iasevoli, G. (2015, December). Measuring value creation in social enterprises. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1173–1193. 21p.Google Scholar
  10. Chell, E., Spence, L. J., Perrini, F., & Harris, J. D. (2016). Social entrepreneurship and business ethics: Does social equal ethical? Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 619–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, C. (2012). A new world of metrics: Trends in monitoring social return. In Investing for impact: How social entrepreneurship is redefining the meaning of return (pp. 31–36).Google Scholar
  12. Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: Why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management & Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dacin, M. T. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 55–67.Google Scholar
  15. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutt, N., Ganesh, U., Chandrasekaran, P., Agarwal, P., Patil, S., & Gupta, A. (2014). Invest catalyze mainstream: The India impact investing story. Mumbai: Intellecap.Google Scholar
  17. Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. GIZ. (2012). Enablers for change—A market landscape of the Indian social enterprise ecosystem. New Delhi, India: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.Google Scholar
  20. Global Impact Investing Network. (2017). IRIS metrics. Retrieved from IRIS https://iris.thegiin.org/metrics?filters=agriculture
  21. Gooptu, B. (2012, September 21). Power of Ideas 2012: NASE, a new voice to boost India’s social ventures. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from The Economic Times: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/power-of-ideas-2012-nase-a-new-voice-to-boost-indias-social-ventures/articleshow/16485116.cms
  22. Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Camón-Cala, J. (2016). A credit score system for socially responsible lending. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haski-Leventhal, D., & Mehra, A. (2015). Impact measurement in social enterprises: Australia and India. Social Enterprise Journal, 12, 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Indian Impact Investors Council. (2016). Prabhav 2016. Proceedings Report, November 15–17, 2016. Gurgaon, India.Google Scholar
  25. Innovations for Poverty Action. (2017). Poverty data use cases—About the PPI. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from Progress out of Poverty: http://www.progressoutofpoverty.org/poverty-data-use-cases
  26. Intellecap. (2016). About PRISM. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from Prism for Impact: http://prismforimpact.com/about-prism/
  27. Kaplan, R. S. (2010). Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard. Working Paper 10-074. Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (1992, January–February). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. (Reprint #92105.)Google Scholar
  29. Kulkarni, N. (2014). Landscape study of SESOs: Understanding information flow and strategies for impact measurement. A White Paper, with an India Focus. Villgro Innovations Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Legatum Foundation. (2017). Social impact index: Measuring performance. Retrieved from Legatum Foundation http://www.legatum.org/sii
  31. McKinsey. (2017). Social impact assessment portal. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from McKinsey & Company: http://mckinseyonsociety.com/social-impact-assessment/
  32. McLoughlin, J., Kaminski, J., Sodagar, B., Khan, S., Harris, R., Arnaudo, G., & McBrearty, S. (2009). A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social enterprises: The SIMPLE methodology. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(2), 154–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Molecke, G., & Pinkse, J. (2016). Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 550–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Natu, J., Singh, D., Shandilya, D., & Jaiswal, S. (2016). Social value economy: A survey of the social enterprise landscape in India. British Council.Google Scholar
  35. Nguyen, L., Szkudlarek, B., & Seymour, R. G. (2015). Social impact measurement in social enterprises: An interdependence perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(4), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niiti Consulting. (2017). Impact measurement design. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from Impact Measurement Design: http://www.niiticonsulting.com/impact-measurement-design.php
  37. Noya, A. (2015). Social impact measurement for social enterprises. Luxembourg: OECD Publishing & European Commission.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. San India. (2010). About us. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from Social Audit Network, India: http://www.san-india.org/about-sanindia.html
  39. Sekar, U. (2015). Impact measurement: The Unitus Seed Fund Way. Unitus Seed Fund.Google Scholar
  40. Watson, K. J., & Whitley, T. (2016). Applying social return on investment (SROI) to the built environment. Building Research & Information, 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anar Bhatt
    • 1
  1. 1.IIM AhmedabadAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations