Evaluating Smart Urban Freight Solutions Using Microsimulation
Last mile distribution remains a difficult-to-solve variable in urban congestion’s equation, especially in Europe, due to increased population, economic growth and limited space. Over the last decades, several European projects have contributed significantly into that direction, by developing innovative concepts (e.g., electric solutions, ITS adoption, effective policy-based strategies). A great number of measures has been deployed and considered as possible solutions to the last mile distribution problem of European cities, however, only a few of them have actually been implemented and tested over a long period of time and their impacts have been quantified.
This study focuses on the evaluation of three smart urban freight transport measures on an urban interchange – Commercial port – by using a microscopic traffic simulation tool in order to decide which is the most effective in environmental and transportation terms. Each measure is being evaluated as if it was to be implemented now (2017) and in 2030 in order to assess measures’ effectiveness in the short as well in the long term. The analysis is completed by using a multi-criteria multi-stakeholder decision making tool to generate the Logistics Sustainability Index (LSI) for each measure, to summarize results and provide a sustainability based rating to support local decision-making.
KeywordsCity logistics Evaluation Micro simulation Logistics Sustainability Index
This work has been supported by the ALLIANCE project (http://alliance-project.eu/) and has been funded within the European Commission’s H2020 Programme under contract number 692426. This paper expresses the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the European Commission. The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained in this paper.
- 1.http://civitas.eu/mobility-measures. Accessed 9 Oct 2017
- 2.Nathanail, E., Gogas, M., Adamos, G.: Smart interconnections and urban freight transport towards achieving sustainable city logistics. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 983–992 (2016). 6th Transport Research Arena, Warsaw, Poland, 18–21 April. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.078
- 3.Port Authority of Volos. http://www.port-volos.gr/. Accessed 30 May 2017
- 4.http://www.ellinikiaktoploia.net. Accessed 9 Oct 2017
- 5.Hellenic Statistical Authority. http://www.statistics.gr/en/home. Accessed 16 June 2017
- 6.Naftemporiki.gr. http://www.naftemporiki.gr/. Accessed 22 Apr 2017
- 7.International Council on Clean Transportation, European Market Statistics. http://eupocketbook.org/. Accessed 16 June 2017
- 8.European Automobile Manufacturers Association (2017). http://www.acea.be/. Accessed 1 July 2017
- 9.Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Microsimulion Guidelines. http://www.wisdot.info/microsimulation/index.php?title=Model_Calibration#The_GEH_Formula. Accessed 30 May 2017
- 12.Barth, M., Mandava, S., Boriboonsomsin, K., Xia, H.: Dynamic ECO-driving for arterial corridors. In: 2011 IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems, Vienna (2011)Google Scholar