Challenges Faced When Addressing the Role of Cities Towards a Below Two Degrees World

  • George Giannakidis
  • Maurizio Gargiulo
  • Rocco De Miglio
  • Alessandro Chiodi
  • Julia Seixas
  • Sofia G. Simoes
  • Luis Dias
  • João P. Gouveia
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 64)

Abstract

In order to achieve the goal of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change to limit average global temperature rise to well under 2 °C, concerted action will be needed in cities to manage energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But, what can be done at city level to move towards such a global ambitious target? The project InSMART (Integrative Smart City Planning) brought together four EU cities: Évora (Portugal), Cesena (Italy), Nottingham (UK) and Trikala (Greece), and scientific organizations in these countries in order to try and provide some answers to this question. A methodology was established for enhancing sustainable energy planning for future city needs through an integrative and multidisciplinary approach, including City Energy System Models (ESM), development of different scenarios with a participatory workshop approach, and a multi-criteria assessment for the final ranking of measures and the development of a Sustainable Energy Action Plan. It is important not to overestimate the contribution and the area of influence of city-agents to the global GHG target; but it is undoubted that municipalities are extremely well positioned for actions related to households, and their consumption in buildings and transport, for bridging locally the gap between what is perceived/known and what would be economically and technically feasible and for urban planning with a focus on significant benefits for GHG emissions reduction.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Union’s FP7 programme under grant agreement No 314164.

The authors acknowledge Nottingham City Council, Municipalities of Évora and Cesena, the Municipal Water Supply-Sewage Enterprise of Trikala (DEYAT), the technical partners FCT, Systra Consultancy, E4SMA S.r.l., University of Nottingham and CRES and all the people directly and indirectly involved in the project, as they all contributed to the development of this work.

References

  1. Brans JP, Mareschal B (1992) Promethee V: MCDM problems with additional segmentation constraints. INFOR 30:85–96MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. De Miglio R, Chiodi A, Gargiulo M (2016a) Report on optimum sustainability pathways—Cesena. http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D5.4-Optimum-Sustainable-Pathways-Cesena.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  3. De Miglio R, Chiodi A, Gargiulo M, Burioli S, Morigi S, Maggioli B, Gentili M (2016b) Mid-Term implementation action plan—Cesena. Available from: http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D6.5-Mid-Term-Implementation-Action-Plan-Cesena.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  4. Dias L, Seixas J, Gouveia JP (2015) Assessment of RES potential at city level. The case of solar technologies. WP4, T4.4. INSMART Integrative Smart City Planning project (ENER/FP7/314164). Available from: http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/I.R.12.WP4-Assessment-of-Solar-Potential.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  5. Giannakidis G, Siakkis P, Nychtis C (2016) Report on optimum sustainability pathways—Trikala. http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D5.2-Optimum-Sustainable-Pathways-Trikala.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  6. Hinkle D (1965) The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. IEA (2016) Energy technology perspectives. http://www.iea.org/etp2016/. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  8. InSMART (2016) Project website http://www.insmartenergy.com/work-package-5/. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  9. Keirstead J, Jennings M, Sivakumar A (2012) A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(6):3847–3866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kostevšek A, Petek J, Čuček L, Pivec A (2013) Conceptual design of a municipal energy and environmental system as an efficient basis for advanced energy planning. Energy 60:148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lind A, Espegren K (2017) The use of energy system models for analysing the transition to low-carbon cities—the case of Oslo. Energy Strateg Rev 15:44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Long G, Robinson D (2016a) Report on optimum sustainability pathways—Nottingham. http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D5.1-Optimum-Sustainable-Pathways-Nottingham.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  13. Long G, Robinson D (2016b) Mid-Term implementation action plan—nottingham. http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D6.2-Mid-Term-Implementation-Action-Plan-Nottingham.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  14. Reckien D, Flacke J, Dawson RJ, Heidrich O, Olazabal M, Foley S, Hamann JJP, Orru H, Salvia M, De Gregorio Hutado S, Geneletti D, Pietrapertosa F (2014) Climate change response in Europe: what’s the reality? Analysis of adaptation and mitigation plans from 200 urban areas in 11 countries. Clim Change 122(1):331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simoes S, Dias L, Gouveia JP, Seixas J (2016) Report on optimum sustainability pathways—Évora. http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D5.3-Optimum-Sustainable-Pathways-Evora.pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2017
  16. Simoes S, Dias L, Gouveia JP, Seixas J (2016) Report on the multicriteria methodology, the process and the results of the decision making—Évora. http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D5.7-Report-on-the-Multi-criteria-methodology-Evora.pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2017
  17. Stavrakakis G, Nychtis C, Giannakidis G (2016) Report on the multicriteria methodology, the process and the results of the decision making—Trikala, Greece. http://www.insmartenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/D5.6-Report-on-the-Multi-criteria-methodology-Trikala.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  18. United Nations (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
  19. Xydis G (2012) Development of an integrated methodology for the energy needs of a major urban city: The case study of Athens, Greece. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(9):6705–6716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yamagata Y, Seya H (2013) Simulating a future smart city: An integrated land use-energy model. Appl Energy 112:1466–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zanon B, Verones S (2013) Climate change, urban energy and planning practices: Italian experiences of innovation in land management tools. Land use policy 32:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Giannakidis
    • 1
  • Maurizio Gargiulo
    • 2
  • Rocco De Miglio
    • 2
  • Alessandro Chiodi
    • 2
  • Julia Seixas
    • 3
  • Sofia G. Simoes
    • 3
  • Luis Dias
    • 3
  • João P. Gouveia
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving (CRES)AthensGreece
  2. 2.E4SMA SrlTurinItaly
  3. 3.CENSE, Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research, NOVA School of Science and TechnologyNOVA University LisbonCaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations