Advertisement

Zoogeographical Notes on Different Orders of Arachnida

  • Petar Beron
Chapter
Part of the Monographiae Biologicae book series (MOBI, volume 94)

Abstract

The distribution of some orders of Arachnida is determined by the preferred temperature of their environment (i.e., thermopreferendum). Thermophilic orders (i.e., those that live at high temperatures) include: Schizomida, Amblypygi, Thelyphonida (Uropygi), Opilioacarida, most of the scorpions, Solifugae, Opilions Laniatores, and Cyphophthalmi. Thermophobic orders (i.e., resistant to cold temperatures) include: Araneae, Opiliones Eupnoi, Dyspnoi, and some mites. These thermophobic orders generally live in the Far North of Eurasia and North America, including Greenland and high in the mountains. The distribution of some orders is a result of paleogeographical events, whereas the distribution of other orders can be difficult to explain (e.g., Holothyrida, spiders of suborder Mesothelae, with families found in New Zealand and Chile; Ricinulei, the genera of Amblypygi e.g., Phrynus in Indonesia, Trichodamon in Brazil; the presence of only one genus of Thelyphonida in a restricted area in West Africa). Most of these scattered groups are clearly relics. Similarly, in some groups (Scorpiones, Pseudoscorpiones) the presence of American elements in the Mediterranean subregion is surprising and demands explanation.

Keywords

Arachnida Palpigrada Schizomida Amblypygi Thelyphonida Scorpiones Ricinulei Solifugae Pseudoscorpiones Opiliones Araneae Opilioacarida Zoogeographical notes distribution 

Bibliography

  1. Beron P (2014) Acarorum Catalogus III. Opilioacarida, Holothyrida, Mesostigmata (Dermanyssoidea). Pensoft Nat Mus Natur Hist Sofia, 286 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Clouse RM (2012) The lineages of Stylocellidae (Arachnida: Opiliones: Cyphophthalmi). Zootaxa 3595:1–34Google Scholar
  3. Condé B (1996) Les Palpigrades, 1885 – 1995: acquisations et lacunes. Revue suisse de Zoologie, vol. hors série: 87–196Google Scholar
  4. Cruz-López JA, Proud D, Pérez-González A (2016) When troglomorphism dupes taxonomists: morphology and molecules reveal the first pyramidopid harvestman (Arachnida, Opiliones, Pyramidopidae) from the New World. Zool J Linnean Soc 177:602–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dippenaar–Schoenman AS, Harvey MS (2000) A check list of the pseudoscorpions of South Africa (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones). Koedoe 43(2):89–102Google Scholar
  6. Gardini G (2000) Catalogo degli Pseudoscorpioni d’Italia (Arachnida). Fragmenta entomologica, Roma 32, Supplemento:1–181Google Scholar
  7. Giribet G, Kury AB (2007) Phylogeny and biogeography. In: Pinto-da-Rocha R, Machado G, Giribet G (eds) Harvestmen: the biology of Opiliones. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 62–87Google Scholar
  8. Gromov AV (1998) A new family, genus and species of scorpions (Arachnida, Scorpiones) from southern Central Asia. Zoologicheskiy Zhournal 77:1003–1008 (in Russian, Engl. Sum.); English trans: 1998. Russian Journal of Zoology 2:409–413.Google Scholar
  9. Harvey MS (1992) The phylogeny and classification of the Pseudoscorpionida (Chelicerata: Arachnida). Invertebrate Taxonomy 6:1373–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harvey MS (2001) The Schizomida (Chelicerata) of the Seychelle Islands. Invertebr Taxon 15(5):681–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haupt J (2003) The Mesothelea – monograph of an exceptional group of spiders (Araneae: Mesothelae) (morphology, behaviour, ecology, taxonomy, distribution and phylogeny). Zoologica 154:1–102Google Scholar
  12. Hedin M, Tsurusaki N, Macías-Ordóñez R, Shultz JW (2012) Molecular systematics of sclerosomatid harvestmen (Opiliones, Phalangioidea, Sclerosomatidae): geography is better than taxonomy in predicting phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol 62:224–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeannel R (1942) La genese des faunes terrestres. Elements de Biogeographie. Presses universitaires de France, 513 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Kury AB (2013) Order Opiliones Sundevall, 1833. In: Zhang Z.-Q. (ed) Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-LEVEL classification and survey of taxonomic richness (Addenda 2013). Zootaxa 3703(1):27–33Google Scholar
  15. Lissner J (2014) The pseudoscorpions of Europe. Images and species descriptions. OnlineGoogle Scholar
  16. Lourenço W (1998) Panbiogéographie, les distributions disjointes et le concept de famille relictuelle chez les scorpions. Biogeographica 74(3):133–144Google Scholar
  17. Martens J (1978) Spinnentiere, Arachnida. Weberknechte, Opiliones. Tierwelt Deutschlands 64:1–464Google Scholar
  18. Miller JA, Coyle FA (1996) Cladistic analysis of the Atypoides plus Antrodiaetus lineage of mygalomorph spiders (Araneae, Antrodiaetidae). J Arachnol 24(3):201–213Google Scholar
  19. Reddell JR, Cokendolpher JC (1995) Catalogue, bibliography, and generic revision of the order Schizomida (Arachnida). Tex Mem Mus Speleol Monogr 4:1–170Google Scholar
  20. Schönhofer AL (2013) A taxonomic catalogue of the Dyspnoi Hansen and Sørensen, 1904 (Arachnida: Opiliones). Zootaxa 3679(1):1–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharma PP, Prieto CE, Giribet G (2011) A new family of Laniatores (Arachnida: Opiliones) from the Afrotropics. Invertebr Syst 25:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shultz JW, Regier JC (2009) Caddo agilis and C. pepperella (Opiliones, Caddidae) diverged phylogenetically before acquiring their disjunct, sympatric distributions in Japan and North America. J Arachnol 37:238–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soleglad ME, Fet V (2003) High-level systematics and phylogeny of the extant scorpions (Scorpiones: Orthosterni). Euscorpius 11:1–175Google Scholar
  24. Suzuki S, Tomiju K, Jano S, Tsurusaki N (1977) Discontinous distributions in relict harvestmen (Opiliones, Arachnida). Acta Arachnologica Tokyo 27:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu X et al (2015) Extant primitively segmented spiders have recently diversified from an ancient lineage. Proc R Soc B 282:2014–2486Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petar Beron
    • 1
  1. 1.National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations