Advertisement

Threshold Concepts and Information Experience in IL Professional Education: Curriculum Design for Online Learning

  • Virginia M. TuckerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 810)

Abstract

Information literacy (IL) professionals are engaged in teaching, mentoring, and collaboration, roles that call for deep understanding of strategies for navigating the information environment. The relatively new construct of information experience provides insights into these integrative roles and is considered together with the theoretical construct of threshold concepts. Threshold concepts in the library and information science (LIS) domain have been explored for professional search expertise and for information literacy. The discussion extends from the IL professional’s roles to the experiential realm of threshold knowledge in online learning. Practical illustrations of designing online curriculum for information professionals based on threshold concept research findings are provided.

Keywords

Information experience MLIS education Information professional education Online education Online learning Threshold concepts 

References

  1. 1.
    Bruce, C.S., Davis, K., Hughes, H., Partridge, H., Stoodley, I. (eds.): Information Experience: Approaches to Theory and Practice. Emerald Group, Bingley (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R.: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (1): linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In: Rust, C. (ed.) Ten Years on Improving Student Learning, pp. 1–16. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, UK (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, A., Johnston, B.: From Information Literacy to Social Epistemology. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA): guidelines for professional library/information educational programs (2012). https://www.ifla.org/publications/guidelines-for-professional-libraryinformation-educational-programs-2012
  5. 5.
    American Library Association (ALA): knowledge and competencies statements developed by relevant professional organizations (n.d.). http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/careers/corecomp/corecompspecial/knowledgecompetencies
  6. 6.
    Tucker, V.M.: The expert searcher’s experience of information. In: Bruce, C.S., Davis, K., Hughes, H., Partridge, H., Stoodley, I. (eds.) Information Experience: Approaches to Theory and Practice, pp. 239–255. Emerald Group, Bingley (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Association of Law Librarians (AALL): competencies of law librarianship (2010). http://www.aallnet.org/mm/Leadership-Governance/policies/PublicPolicies/competencies.html
  8. 8.
    Medical Library Association (MLA): MLA’s competencies for lifelong learning and professional success (2016). http://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=39
  9. 9.
    Tucker, V.M., Weedman, J., Bruce, C.S., Edwards, S.L.: Learning portals: analyzing threshold concept theory for LIS education. J. Educ. Libr. Inf. Sci. 55(2), 150–165 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL): framework for information literacy for higher education (2016). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  11. 11.
    Townsend, L., Hofer, A.R., Hanick, S.L., Brunetti, K.: Identifying threshold concepts for information literacy: a Delphi study. Commun. Inf. Lit. 10(1), 23–49 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Todd, R.J.: Preface. In: Bruce, C.S., Davis, K., Hughes, H., Partridge, H., Stoodley, I. (eds.) Information Experience: Approaches to Theory and Practice, pp. xxi–xxiii. Emerald Group, Bingley (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yates, C., Partridge, H., Bruce, C.: Exploring information experiences through phenomenography. Libr. Inf. Res. 36(112), 96–119 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cousin, G.: Neither teacher-centred nor student-centred: threshold concepts and research partnerships. J. Learn. Dev. High. Educ. 2, 1–9 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Land, R., Meyer, J.H.F., Baillie, C.: Preface: threshold concepts and transformational learning. In: Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R., Baillie, C. (eds.) Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning, pp. ix–xlii. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cousin, G.: An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet 17, 4–5 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J.H.F., Davies, P.: Implications for course design and evaluation. In: Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R. (eds.) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, pp. 195–206. Routledge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R.: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. High. Educ. 49, 373–388 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Macleod, H., Ross, J.: Structure, authority, and other noncepts. In: Land, R., Bayne, S. (eds.) Digital Difference: Perspectives on Online Learning, pp. 15–27. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blackmore, M.: Student engagement with information: applying a threshold concept approach to information literacy development. In: Proceedings Third Biennial Threshold Concepts Symposium, Sydney, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    San José State University, School of Information: Masters of Library and Information Science program. http://ischool.sjsu.edu/programs/master-library-and-information-science-mlis
  22. 22.
    Todd, R.: The thing itself: on the search for authenticity. Penguin Group, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer, J.H.F.: Threshold concepts and pedagogic representation. Educ.+ Train. 58(5), 463–475 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meyer, J.H.F., Timmermans, J.: Integrated threshold concept knowledge. In: Land, R., Meyer, H.F., Flanagan, M.T. (eds.) Threshold Concepts in Practice, pp. 25–38. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bruce, C.S.: Information literacy research: dimensions of the emerging collective consciousness, a reflection. Aust. Acad. Res. Libr. 47(4), 220–238 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InformationSan José State UniversitySan JoséUSA

Personalised recommendations