Advertisement

The Role of Sense of Coherence in Knowledge Sharing

  • Jannica HeinströmEmail author
  • Farhan Ahmad
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 810)

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is a key competence in a work context. In this study we address knowledge sharing from an individual difference perspective, exploring whether an employee’s sense of coherence influences knowledge sharing. Additionally, we investigate whether dedication to diversified learning mediates the relationship between Sense of Coherence (SOC) and knowledge sharing. A survey was conducted in a multinational organization. We received 403 responses. Partial least square structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The results show that SOC significantly influences the respondents’ self-perceived knowledge sharing activities. However, the relationship is partially mediated by dedication to diversified learning. Results suggest that an employee’s knowledge sharing partly arise from personal characteristics. How much is shared in actuality, however, depends on motivation and contextual factors.

Keywords

Sense of coherence Information mastering Information literacy Knowledge sharing 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad, F.: Knowledge sharing in a non-native language context: challenges and strategies. J. Inf. Sci. Online First, 0165551516683607 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad, F.: Knowledge-sharing networks: language diversity, its causes, and consequences. Knowl. Process Manag. 24(2), 139–151 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Small, C.T., Sage, A.P.: Knowledge management and knowledge sharing: a review. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag. 5(3), 153–169 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ipe, M.: Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2(4), 337–359 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, S., Noe, R.A.: Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 20(2), 115–131 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cabrera, A., Collins, W.C., Salgado, J.F.: Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 17(2), 245–264 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jarvenpaa, S.L., Staples, D.S.: The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants. J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 9(3), 129–154 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levert, T., Lucas, M., Ortlepp, K.: Burnout in psychiatric nurses: contributions of the work environment and a sense of coherence. South Afr. J. Psychol. 30(2), 36–43 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antonovsky, A.: Health Stress and Coping. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1979)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antonovsky, A.: Unraveling the Mystery of Health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antonovsky, A.: Health promoting factors at work: the sense of coherence. In: Kalimo, R., Eltatawi, M., Cooper, C. (eds.) Psychosocial Factors at Work and Their Effects on Health, pp. 153–167. World Health Organization, Geneva (1987)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feldt, T.: The role of sense of coherence in well-being at work: analysis of main and moderator effects. Work Stress 11(2), 134–147 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Albertsen, K., Nielsen, M.L., Borg, V.: The Danish psychosocial work environment and symptoms of stress: the main, mediating and moderating role of sense of coherence. Work Stress 15(3), 241–253 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jenny, G.J., Bauer, G.F., Vinje, H.F., Vogt, K., Torp, S.: The application of salutogenesis to work. In: Mittelmark, M.B., Sagy, S., Eriksson, M., Bauer, G.F., Pelikan, J.M., Lindström, B., Espnes, G.A. (eds.) The Handbook of Salutogenesis, pp. 197–210. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04600-6_20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feldt, T., Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S.: A mediational model of sense of coherence in the work context: a one-year follow-up study. J. Organ. Behav. 21, 461–476 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalimo, R., Vuori, J.: Work factors and health: the predictive role of pre-employment experiences. J. Occup. Psychol. 64(2), 97–115 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feldt, T., Kivimäki, M., Rantala, A., Tolvanen, A.: Sense of coherence and work characteristics: a cross-lagged structural equation model among managers. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 77(3), 323–342 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nilsson, P., Andersson, I.H., Ejlertsson, G., Troein, M.: Workplace health resources based on sense of coherence theory. Int. J. Workplace Health Manag. 5(3), 156–167 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Togari, T., Yamazaki, Y.: A causal relationship between sense of coherence and psycho-social work environment: from one-year follow-up data among Japanese young adult workers. Global Health Promot. 19(1), 32–42 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grevenstein, D., Bluemke, M.: Can the big five explain the criterion validity of sense of coherence for mental health, life satisfaction, and personal distress? Personal. Individ. Differ. 77, 106–111 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cleveland, S., Ellis, T.J.: The impact of role conflict, role ambiguity, and locus of control on organizational knowledge sharing practices. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences System Sciences [HICSS], pp. 3801–3810. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, J., Zhou, M., Zhang, J.: The interactive effects of personality and burnout on knowledge sharing among teachers. Soc. Behav. Personal.: Int. J. 44(8), 1267–1280 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang, C., Chen, L.: Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? J. Inf. Sci. 33, 95–109 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Antonovsky, A.: The structure and properties of the sense of coherence measurement. Soc. Sci. Med. 36(6), 725–733 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huvila, I.: Meta-games in information work. Inf. Res. 18(3) (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castro, I., Roldán, J.L.: A mediation model between dimensions of social capital. Int. Bus. Rev. 22(6), 1034–1050 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H.: Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 515–534. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klarner, P., Sarstedt, M., Hoeck, M., Ringle, C.M.: Disentangling the effects of team competences, team adaptability, and client communication on the performance of management consulting teams. Long Range Plan. 46(3), 258–286 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, H.J., Anderson, R.E.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Amaro, S., Duarte, P.: An integrative model of consumers’ intentions to purchase travel online. Tourism Manag. 46, 64–79 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wong, K.K.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling [PLS-SEM] techniques using SmartPLS. Market. Bull. 24(1), 1–32 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Preacher, K.J., Hayes, A.F.: Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in simple and multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3), 879–891 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling [PLS-SEM]. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Helm, S., Eggert, A., Garnefeld, I.: Modelling the impact of corporate reputation on customer satisfaction and loyalty using PLS. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II, pp. 515–534. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_23
  36. 36.
    Ek, S.: Om information, Media och Hälsa i en Samhällelig Kontext: en Empirisk och Analytisk Studie [On Information, Media and Health in a Societal Context: an Empirical and Analytic Study]. Åbo Akademis Förlag, Åbo, Finland (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ek, S., Widén-Wulff, G.: Information mastering, perceived health and societal status: an empirical study of the Finnish population. Libri 58(2), 74–81 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T., von Krogh, G., Mueller, J.: Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 22(2), 296–310 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information StudiesÅbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations