Advertisement

Social Demands in Ubiquitous Computing: Contexts for Tomorrow’s Learning

  • Mareen PrzybyllaEmail author
  • Ralf Romeike
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 515)

Abstract

We live in times of digital change, which manifests in the increasing pervasiveness of embedded and cyber-physical systems in our society. This change also needs to be reflected in education, as new knowledge and competencies become necessary to deal with everyday life challenges, for instance when estimating consequences of capturing, transmitting and evaluating sensor data in many devices and acting accordingly and responsibly. This article examines requirements that the digital society places on CS education. In our analysis, we identified numerous contexts, activities and knowledge areas relevant for students to cope with challenges of the digital world. Combined with content knowledge relevant in this domain, suitable phenomena and thus anchor points for teaching can be generated and, on this basis, specific learning scenarios can be developed that also consider general educative aims imposed by our society.

Keywords

Computer science Education Embedded systems Ubiquitous computing Social demands 

References

  1. 1.
    Arbeitskreis Bildungsstandards der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.: Grundsätze und Standards für die Informatik in der Schule [Principles and standards for computer science in school], LOG IN 28 (150/151), supplement (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arbeitskreis Bildungsstandards SII der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.: Bildungsstandards Informatik für die Sekundarstufe II [Educational standards for secondary education] LOG IN 36 (183/184), supplement (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    BITKOM: Eingebettete Systeme–Ein strategisches Wachstumsfeld für Deutschland [Embedded Systems–A stratgic growth area for Germany]. http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/EingebetteteSysteme_web.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2017
  4. 4.
    Bojanova, I., Hurlburt, G., Voas, J.: Imagineering an internet of anything. Computer 47(6), 72–77 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bundeselternrat: Selbstbestimmtes Leben als Ziel von Bildung–Was müssen unsere Kinder heute lernen? [Self-determined life as a goal of education–What do our children have to learn today?]. http://www.bundeselternrat.de/files/Dokumente/Resolutionen/2016/Bundeselternrat_Reso_Selbstbestimmtes_Leben_als_Ziel_von_Bildung20160424.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2017
  6. 6.
    Bundeselternrat: Digitalisierung/Individualisierung. [Digitization/Individualization]. https://bildungsklick.de/schule/meldung/digitalisierung-individualisierung/. Accessed 26 July 2017
  7. 7.
    Diethelm, I., Hubwieser, P., Klaus, R.: Students, teachers and phenomena: educational reconstruction for computer science education. In: Laakso, M.-J., McCartney, R. (eds.) Proceedings of Koli Calling 2012, pp. 164–173. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Parents’ Association: Manifesto (2015). http://euparents.eu/manifesto-2015/. Accessed 26 July 2017
  9. 9.
    Friedewald, M., Raabe, O., Georgieff, P., Koch, D.J.: Ubiquitäres Computing. [Ubiquitous Computing] Nomos Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Informatics Europe and ACM Europe Working Group on Informatics Education: Informatics Education: Europe Cannot Afford to Miss the Boat. Technical report (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grillenberger, A., Przybylla, M., Romeike, R.: Bringing CS innovations to the classroom using the model of educational reconstruction. In: Proceedings of ISSEP 2016, pp. 31–39. Münster, Germany (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hertzberg, J., Lingemann, K., Nüchter, A.: Mobile Roboter [Mobile Robots], vol. 7. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01726-1 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kultusministerkonferenz: Bildung in der digitalen Welt [Education in the digital world], KMK, Berlin, Germany (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, E.A., Seshia, S.A.: Introduction to Embedded Systems - A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayring, P.: Qualitative Content Analysis. Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt, Austria (2014). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173. Accessed 26 July 2017
  16. 16.
    Przybylla, M., Romeike, R.: Overcoming issues with students’ perceptions of informatics in everyday life and education with physical computing–suggestions for the enrichment of computer science classes. In: Gülbahar, Y., Karatas, E., Müge, A. (eds.) Proceedings of ISSEP 2014, pp. 9–20. Ankara University Press, Ankara (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Przybylla, M., Romeike, R.: Teaching computer science teachers – a constructionist approach to professional development on physical computing. In: Sipitakiat, A., Tutiyaphuengprasert, N. (eds.) Proceedings of Constructionism 2016, pp. 265–274. Suksapattana Foundation, Bangkok (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vahid, F., Givargis, T.D.: Embedded System Design: A Unified Hardware/Software Introduction. Wiley, New York (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiser, M.: Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Commun. ACM 36(7), 75–84 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations