The Effect of Non-Flat Interfaces On System Dynamics
Manufactured surfaces are never completely flat due to a variety of reasons including: variability in manufacturing operations, material behavior and achievable geometric tolerances. The curvature of surfaces is a local geometric effect that affects part-to-part variability of jointed surfaces. Joints with different interface geometries behave in unpredictable ways (Brake (2018) The Mechanics of Jointed Structure: Recent Research and Open Challenges for Developing Predictive Models for Structural Dynamics. Sandia National Laboratories, William Marsh Rice University. Springer, Cham). Among the factors that drive the uncertainty in joint performance are frictional micro and macro sliding events, surface tribology effects, residual stress from manufacturing and assembly, loss of bolt pre-load, changes in contact area and the resulting pressure field variation around the joint. The goal of this research is to identify key variables that account for the measured uncertainty in the dynamics of jointed structures, which may have local regions of conformal and non-conformal contact due to variability inherent in the manufacturing process. Using the standard benchmark system of the Brake-Reuβ beam (BRB), recommendations are made for which design parameters require higher tolerances than others to minimize variability in a cost-effective manner. Conformal beams with strong and weak curvature are studied as well as non-conformal (flat vs. curved) beams. Experimental and numerical approaches model and validate the physical behavior of beams to understand primary causes of non-linearity in joints with different interface geometries.
KeywordsJoint Interface Nonlinear Curvature Variability
This work was developed during the 6-week 2017 ND-CSI (Nonlinear Dynamics of Coupled Structures and Interfaces) summer research program hosted at the William Marsh Rice University, Mechanical Engineering Department.
- 1.Brake, M.R.W. (ed.): The Mechanics of Jointed Structure: Recent Research and Open Challenges for Developing Predictive Models for Structural Dynamics. Sandia National Laboratories, William Marsh Rice University. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
- 3.Dossogne, T., Jerome, T.W., Lancereau, D.P.T., Smith, S.A., Brake, M.R.W., Pacini, B.R., Reuss, P., Schwingshackl, C.W.: Experimental assessment of the influence of interface geometries on structural dynamic response. In: Dynamics of Coupled Structures, vol. 4, pp. 255–261. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bonney, M.S., Robertson, B.A., Schempp, F., Mignolet, M., Brake, M.R.: Experimental determination of frictional interface models, in IMAC XXXIV A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics, (Orlando, FL), February 2016Google Scholar
- 5.Sracic, M.W., Allen, M.S., Sumali, H.: Identifying the Modal Properties of Nonlinear Structures Using Measured Free Response Time Histories from a Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer, pp. 269–286. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar