Advertisement

The Survival of International New Ventures

  • Ram Mudambi
  • Shaker A. Zahra
Chapter
Part of the JIBS Special Collections book series (JIBSSC)

Abstract

International new ventures (INVs) are a popular mode of entry into foreign markets. INVs, those companies that enter foreign markets at inception, often suffer the two liabilities of newness and foreignness, which may increase the odds of their failure. This paper empirically examines the survival of INVs by comparing them with other sequential modes of international operations (e.g., acquisitions). Data from 275 British firms show that INVs have lower unconditional survival probabilities than other modes of foreign market entry. Our analyses also show that differences in survival probabilities disappear when the firms’ competitive strategies are considered.

Keywords

International new ventures Firm survival Multinational firms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support of the School of Business at the University of Buckingham and the project support of the UK Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). We thank David Audretsch, Bo Carlsson, Mark Casson, Tom Kniesner, Eric Rasmusen and seminar participants at the DTI, Case Western Reserve University and Indiana University for helpful comments. We also thank three anonymous JIBS reviewers, as well as Arie Y. Lewin, who were instrumental in significantly improving the paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Andrews, K. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  2. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B. (1991). New firm survival and the technological regime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Mahmood, T. (1995). New firm survival: New results using a hazard function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.Google Scholar
  8. Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(8), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum, J. A. C., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloodgood, J. M., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (1996). The internationalization of new high-potential US ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival chances of new founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckley, P. J., & Carter, M. J. (1998). The economics of business process design in multinational firms. In R. Mudambi & M. Ricketts (Eds.), The organisation of the firm: International business perspectives (pp. 56–78). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cantwell, J. A. (1989). Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Cantwell, J. A. (1995). The globalisation of technology: What remains of the product cycle model? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 155–174.Google Scholar
  16. Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. (2000). The location of MNE R&D: The role of investment incentives. Management International Review, 40(Special Issue 1), 127–148.Google Scholar
  17. Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. (2005). MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Casson, M. C. (1990). Enterprise and competitiveness: A systems view of international business. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Casson, M. C. (1994). Institutional diversity in overseas enterprise: Explaining the free-standing company. Business History, 36(4), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Casson, M. C. (1996). The nature of the firm: Information synthesis and entrepreneurial organisation. Management International Review, 36(1), 55–94.Google Scholar
  21. Casson, M. C. (1997a). Entrepreneurial networks in international business. Business and Economic History, 26(2), 811–823.Google Scholar
  22. Casson, M. C. (1997b). Information and organization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Casson, M. C. (1998). The economics of internal organisation with special reference to the multinational enterprise. In R. Mudambi & M. Ricketts (Eds.), The organisation of the firm: International business perspectives (pp. 22–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Caves, R. E. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), 1947–1982.Google Scholar
  25. Chapman, S. D. (1992). Merchant enterprise in Britain: From the industrial revolution to World War I. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coombs, J., Mudambi, R., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). An examination of the investments in US biotechnology firms by foreign and domestic corporate partners. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Czinkota, M. R., Ronkainen, I. A., & Moffett, M. H. (1996). International business (4th ed.). New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  28. DeCarolis, D., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1028–1038.Google Scholar
  30. Devereux, M., & Griffith, R. (1998). Taxes and the location of production: Evidence from a panel of US multinationals. Journal of Public Economics, 68(3), 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Doh, J., Teegen, H., & Mudambi, R. (2004). Balancing private and state ownership in emerging markets telecommunications infrastructure: Country, industry, and firm influences. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(3), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Doz, Y. L. (1997). Cooperating at the edge: A complexity theory analysis of alliance instability. Working Paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar
  33. Driffield, N., & Munday, M. (1997). Industrial performance, agglomeration and foreign manufacturing investment in the UK. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dun & Bradstreet. (1992a). Business register. London, UK: Dun & Bradstreet.Google Scholar
  35. Dun & Bradstreet. (1992b–1996). Business failures and expectations. London, UK: Dun & Bradstreet.Google Scholar
  36. Dunning, J. (1981). International production and the multinational enterprise. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  37. Eliasson, G., & Eliasson, A. (1997). The pharmaceutical and biotechnology competence bloc and the development of losec. In B. Carlsson (Ed.), Technological systems and industrial dynamics (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. European Court of Justice. (1999). Centros Ltd. v. Erhvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen, 9 March, Case C – 212/97.Google Scholar
  39. European Court of Justice. (2003). Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v. Inspire Art Ltd, 30 September, Case C – 212/97.Google Scholar
  40. Evans, D. S. (1987a). The relationship between firm growth, size and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Evans, D. S. (1987b). Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. Journal of Political Economy, 95(4), 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial up-grading in the apparel commodity Chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Geroski, P., & Schwalbach, J. (1991). Entry and market contestability: An international comparison. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Greene, W. H. (1993). Econometric analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  46. Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Henderson, A. D. (1999). Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liability of newness, adolescence and obsolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 281–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hennart, J.-F. (1982). A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hennart, J.-F., & Park, Y. R. (1993). Greenfield vs acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39(9), 1054–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hood, N., & Young, S. (1979). The economics of multinational enterprise. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  52. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1993). ‘Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 14(4), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Klepper, S. (2002). Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly. RAND Journal of Economics, 33(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (1994). Operating flexibility, global manufacturing and the option value of a multinational network. Management Science, 40(1), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kohn, T. (1997). Small firms as international players. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kotabe, M. (1998). Efficiency vs effectiveness orientation of global sourcing strategy: A comparison of US and Japanese multinational companies. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 107–199.Google Scholar
  59. Li, J. (1995). Foreign entry and survival: Effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Li, J., & Guisinger, S. (1991). Comparative business failures of foreign-controlled firms in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Liebeskind, J., Oliver, A., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1995). Social networks, learning and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. NBER Working Paper #5320 (October), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  62. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Masten, S. E. (1993). Transaction costs, mistakes and performance: Assessing the importance of governance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mata, J., & Portugal, J. (1994). Life duration of new firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(3), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mata, J., & Portugal, J. (2002). The survival of new domestic and foreign-owned firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McCloughan, P., & Stone, I. (1998). Life duration of foreign multinational subsidiaries: Evidence from UK northern manufacturing industry 1970–93. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(6), 719–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (1996). New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McEnrue, M. (1988). Length of experience and the performance of managers. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 175–185.Google Scholar
  71. Mitchell, W. (1994). The dynamics of evolving markets: The effects of business sales and age on dissolutions and divestitures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 575–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mitchell, W., Shaver, J. M., & Yeung, B. (1994). ‘Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies’ experience in United States medical sector markets. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1996). Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mudambi, R. (1998). The role of duration in multinational investment strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2), 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mudambi, R. (1999). MNE internal capital markets and subsidiary strategic independence. International Business Review, 8(2), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mudambi, R., & Helper, S. (1998). The “close but adversarial” model of supplier relations in the US auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 775–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mudambi, R., Schründer, C. P., & Mongar, A. (2004). How cooperative is cooperative purchasing in smaller firms? Long Range Planning, 37(1), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Murray, J. Y., & Kotabe, M. (1999). Sourcing strategies of US service companies: A modified transaction-cost analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 20(9), 791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. OECD. (1996). Technology, productivity and job creation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  81. Office for National Statistics. (1992). UK standard industrial classification of economic activities. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  82. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pakes, A. (1985). Patents, R&D and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  85. Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in global industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  86. Ramamurti, R. (2001). The obsolescing “Bargaining Model”? MNC-host developing country relations revisited. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rasmusen, E. (1998). Observed choice and optimism in estimating the effects of government policies. Public Choice, 97(1/2), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ray, D. M. (1989). Entrepreneurial companies “born international”: Four case studies. Paper presented at the Babson Research Conference on Entrepreneurship, St Louis.Google Scholar
  89. Sako, M. (1992). Prices, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sambharya, R. (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), 739–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sanchez, A. M., & Perez, O. U. (1998). Entrepreneurship networks and high technology firms: The case of Aragon. Technovation, 18(5), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sapienza, H., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. (2006). The effect of early internationalization on firm profitability and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Scherer, F. M. (1984). Innovation and growth: Schumpeterian perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  94. Shaver, J. M. (1998). Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science, 44(4), 571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Shaver, J. M., Mitchell, W., & Yeung, B. (1997). The effect of own-firm and other-firm experience on foreign direct investment survival in the United States, 1987–92. Strategic Management Journal, 18(10), 811–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Shepherd, D., & Douglas, E. (2000). New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks and risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 394–312.Google Scholar
  97. Shrader, R., Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. P. (2000). How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1227–1247.Google Scholar
  98. Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Wang, Z. M. (1996). The manager as mediator of alternative meanings: A pilot study from China, the USA and UK. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sohn, J. H. (1994). Social knowledge as a control system: A proposition and evidence from the Japanese FDI behavior. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stinchcome, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  101. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
  102. Thorelli, H. B., & Glowacka, A. E. (1995). Willingness of American industrial buyers to source internationally. Journal of Business Research, 32(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  105. Wren, C. (1996). Industrial subsidies: The UK experience. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint-venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6), 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zahra, S. (2005). Theory on international new ventures: A decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). International entrepreneurship: Research contributions and future directions. In M. Hitt, D. R. Ireland, M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation (pp. 255–258). New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  110. Zahra, S., Ireland, D. R., & Hitt, M. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.Google Scholar
  111. Zimmerman, M., & Zeitz, G. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ram Mudambi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shaker A. Zahra
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of General and Strategic Management, Institute of Global Management Studies, Fox School of BusinessTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  3. 3.Center for Entrepreneurial Studies and Department of Strategic Management and Organization, Carlson School of ManagementUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations