Advertisement

Requirements for an Augmented Reality-Based Assistance System

Raising the Safety Level of Mobile Cranes
  • Moritz Quandt
  • Thies Beinke
  • Michael Freitag
  • Christian Kölsch
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)

Abstract

Commercial vehicles raise the efficiency of work processes in many fields of application. This is in contrast to a comparatively high number of accidents that are often associated with serious personal and property damage. Therefore, this contribution presents an approach to develop an assistance system for mobile cranes that raises the safety level in the working area. By applying Augmented Reality technology, the developed assistance system provides safety-related information directly in the field of vision of the crane operator. In this contribution, the authors present user requirements for the development of such an assistance system. On this basis, trajectories for the user-centered development for an Augmented Reality-based assistance system are revealed in the context of mobile cranes.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for their support within the project safeguARd - Augmented Reality-based assistance system for commercial vehicles to raise the safety level (funding code: 16SV7739).

References

  1. Al-Humaidi, H.M., Hadipriono Tan, F.: Mobile crane safe operation approach to prevent electrocution using fuzzy-set logic models. Adv. Eng. Softw. 40, 686–696 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.11.016 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence 6, 355–385 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dini, G., Dalle Mura, M.: Application of augmented reality techniques in through-life engineering services. Procedia CIRP 38(2015), 14–23 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fang, Y., Cho, Y.K., Chen, J.: A framework for real-time pro-active safety assistance for mobile crane lifting operations. Autom. Constr. 72, 367–379 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mandal, S., Singh, K., Behera, R.K., Sahu, S.K., Raj, N., Maiti, J.: Human error identification and risk prioritization in overhead crane operations using HTA, SHERPA and fuzzy VIKOR method. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 7195–7206 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Marquez, A.A., Venturino, P., Otegui, J.L.: Common root causes in recent failures of cranes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 39, 55–64 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Milazzo, M.F., Ancione, G., Spasojevic Brkic, V., Valis, D.: Investigation of crane operation safety by analysing main accident causes. In: Walls, L., Revie, M., Bedford, T. (eds.) Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice. CRC Press, London (2017)Google Scholar
  8. Næestad, T.O.: Safety understandings among crane operators and process operators on a Norwegian offshore platform. Saf. Sci. 46, 520–534 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Quandt, M., Ait Alla, A., Meyer, L., Freitag, M.: Success factors for the development of augmented reality-based assistance systems for maintenance services. In: Schmitt, R.H., Schuh, G. (Hrsg.): 7 WGP-Jahreskongress, Aachen, 5–6 Oktober 2017. Apprimus Verlag, Aachen, S. 175–182 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. Raviv, G., Fishbain, B., Shapira, A.: Analysing risk factors in crane-related near-miss and accident reports. Saf. Sci. 91, 192–205 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shapira, A., Simcha, M.: Measurement and risk scales of crane-related safety factors on construction sites. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135, 979–989 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Spasojevic Brkic, V.K., Klarin, M.M., Brkic, A.D.: Ergonomic design of crane cabin interior: the path to improved safety. Saf. Sci. 73, 43–51 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teizer, J., Cheng, T.: Proximity hazard indicator for workers-on-foot near miss interactions with construction equipment and geo-referenced hazard areas. Autom. Constr. 60, 58–73 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang, C., Hammad, A.: Improving lifting motion planning and re-planning of cranes with consideration for safety and efficiency. Adv. Eng. Inform. 26, 396–410 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moritz Quandt
    • 1
  • Thies Beinke
    • 1
  • Michael Freitag
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christian Kölsch
    • 3
  1. 1.BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH at the University of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Production EngineeringUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.craniMAX GmbHZweibrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations