Implementation of Cost Leadership Strategy by Russian Medical Companies of Laboratory Diagnostics

  • Natalia Bryksina
  • Anna Golovina
  • Fedor Legotin
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to present the results of the study, which included analysis of the peculiarities of implementing the strategy of leadership on the costs of the activities of Russian medical companies in the field of laboratory diagnosis. The urgency of the study is due to the need to find ways to improve the efficiency of healthcare in Russia. During the study, methods of comparative and statistical analysis were used. The study involved several stages. Firstly, the condition of the market for laboratory diagnostic research was studied. At the second stage, the structure of expenses for laboratory diagnostics and the formation of the cost of research by different types of laboratories were studied. At the third stage, the strategies inherent in these types of laboratories were considered. The result of the study was the consideration of the economic effect for the health system from the implementation of the strategy of leadership on the costs of medical companies in the field of laboratory diagnosis. Our study might as well be of a special interest for healthcare economy professionals.

References

  1. Bailey TM (1999) Understanding the economics of bedside diagnostic testing. In: Prace CP, Hicka JM (eds) Point-of-care testing. AACC Press, Washington, DC, pp 213–232Google Scholar
  2. Bordea E, Manea M, Pelligrini A (2017) Unemployment and coping with stress, anxiety, and depression. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 6(2):6–14.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2017.6.2.1 Google Scholar
  3. BusinessStat (2017) Statistics. http://bso.hktdc.com/bso/jsp/bso_home.jsp. Accessed 23 Oct 2017
  4. Čábelková I, Abrhám J, Strielkowski W (2015) Factors influencing job satisfaction in post-transition economies: the case of the Czech Republic. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 21(4):448–456.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1073007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CDC Diabetes Cost-Effectiveness Study Group (1998) The cost-effectiveness of screening for type 2 diabetes. J Am Med Assoc 280(20):1757–1763.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.20.1757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CMS (Formerly Health Care Financing Administration) (2000) http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309072662/html/30.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2017
  7. Corinne RF (2017) Defining & reporting critical values. www.aacc.org. Accessed 24 Oct 2017
  8. Evgina SA (2006) Ekonomitcheskye aspekty osnaschenya biokhymitcheskoy laboratorii [Economic aspects of the equipment of biochemical laboratory]. Spravotshnik Zaveduschego KDL 6:15–23Google Scholar
  9. Fantus J (1990) The 10% solution to lab profitability. MLO 33:33–38Google Scholar
  10. Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM (2000) Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. J Am Med Assoc 284(15):1954–1961.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.15.1954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilmanov A, Hayrulin I, Nurmyeva L, Leontyeva O (2013) Tsentralyzatsya laboratornoy slyzhby gosudarstvennyh medicinskyh ucherezhdeniy na baze kliniko-diagnosticheskoy laoratorii krupnogo mnogoprofilnogo statsionara [Centralization of the laboratory services of the state medical facilities on the example of large high-profile stationary]. Healthc Manag 11:14–22Google Scholar
  12. Gupta V, Das S, Singh A, Kumar A (2012) Improved utilization of laboratory services. Pac J Sci Technol 13(2):318–321Google Scholar
  13. Kishkun A (2011) Aktualnost problemy tsentralizatsii klinicheskyh laborarnykh issledovaniy dla sistemy zdravookhranenya strany [Actual problem of centralization of clinical laboratory research for the system of healthcare of a country]. Lab Med 11:29–34Google Scholar
  14. Kishkun A (2014) Prepyatstvya na puti tsentralisatsii klinitcheskikh laboratornykh issledovaniy [Obstacles on the path of centralization of clinical laboratory research]. Manag Health 11:11–26.Google Scholar
  15. Kishkun A, Guzovskiy A (2007) Laboratornye informatsionnye sistemy i ekonomitscheskye aspekty deyatelnosti laboratorii [Laboratory systems and economic aspects of laboratory operation], 1st edn. Labora, Moscow, 256 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Lisin E, Strielkowski W (2014) Modelling new economic approaches for the wholesale energy markets in Russia and the EU. Transform Bus Econ 13(2B):566–580Google Scholar
  17. Lisin E, Lebedev I, Sukhareva E, Komarov I (2014) Analysis of scenario of structural and technological modernization of the power industry in the context of competitive electricity markets. Int Econ Lett 3(3):105–114.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.3.3 Google Scholar
  18. Porter М (1980) Competitive strategy, 1st edn. Free Press, New York, 220 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Sveshchinskiy M (2013) Trendy razvitya laboratornoy sluzhby v Rossii v 2009–2012 godakh [Trends of development of laboratory service in Russia in 2009–2012]. Healthc Manag 10:45–49Google Scholar
  20. Vasylchak S, Halachenko A (2016) Theoretical basis for the development of resort services: regional aspect. Int Econ Lett 5(2):54–62.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2016.5.2.3 Google Scholar
  21. Weinstein, M (1981) Economic assessments of medical practices and technologies. Medical Decision Making 1(4):309–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. William OU (1996) The customer-oriented laboratory, 2nd edn. American Society of Clinical Pathologists, Chicago Press, Chicago, 294 pGoogle Scholar
  23. Zielińska A (2016) Information is a market products and information markets. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 5(4):31–38.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2016.5.4.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Bryksina
    • 1
  • Anna Golovina
    • 1
  • Fedor Legotin
    • 1
  1. 1.Ural State University of EconomicsYekaterinburgRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations