Remedies for the Perils of Mass Society

  • Michael Haas


Having diagnosed why democracies flounder, the book ends with prescriptions for how to revitalize democratic principles. Whereas most observers focus on micro-remedies, the major macro-remedy is to overcome the philosophy of Social Darwinism and the emphasis on pragmatic goal attainment as the basis for thinking about government. Instead, there is a need to return to the goals of the Enlightenment, which is to advance a humanistic belief that the needs of society transcend those of the individual. The Enlightenment, which sought to go beyond fear and ignorance by solving problems with factual information and science, was the premise for the adoption of democracy. Democracy flounders and fails when the goals of the Enlightenment are abandoned, so the future depends on a restoration of Enlightenment thinking.


  1. Aldrich, John, and David Rohde (2000). “The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government.” In Polarized Politics, Congress and the Presidency in a Partisan Era, ed. John R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, Chap. 3. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alighieri, Dante (1313). On World Government. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957.Google Scholar
  3. Alterman, Eric (2011). Kabuki Democracy: The System vs. Barack Obama. New York: The Nation Books.Google Scholar
  4. Annenberg Public Policy Center (2016). Americans Are Poorly Informed About Basic Constitutional Provisions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Archibugi, Daniele (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archibugi, Daniele, Mathias-Koeni Archibugi, and Raffaele Marchetti (2012). “Introduction: Mapping Global Democracy.” In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, ed. Daniele Archibugi, Mathias-Koeni Archibugi, and Raffaele Marchetti, Chap. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ash, Timothy Garton (2017). “Is Europe Disintegrating?,” New York Review of Books, 64 (1): 24–26.Google Scholar
  8. Associated Press (2016). “More States Consider Working Around the Electoral College,” Denver Post, December 23. Accessed October 2, 2017.Google Scholar
  9. Bagehot, Walter (1867). The English Constitution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  10. Barnes, Peter (2006). Capitalism 3.0: A Guide to Reclaiming the Commons. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  11. Beardsworth, Richard (2011). Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Binder, Sarah A. (2003). Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  13. Brady, David W., and Craig Volden (2005). Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policies from Carter to George W. Bush, 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  14. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Feryal Marie Cherif, George W. Downs, and Alistair Smith (2005). “Thinking Inside the Box: A Closer Look at Democracy and Human Rights,” International Studies Quarterly, 49 (3): 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burden, Barry C. (2005). “Ralph Nader’s Campaign Strategy in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election,” American Politics Research, 33 (5): 672–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Call, Charles T. (2011). “Beyond the ‘Failed State’: Toward Conceptual Alternatives,” European Journal of International Relations, 17 (2): 302–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carmichael, Stokely, and Charles V. Hamilton (1967). Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  18. Carver, Terrell, and Jens Bartelson, eds. (2011). Globality, Democracy, and Civil Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighborhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Crouch, Colin (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Crozier, Michael J., Samuel P. Huntington, and Joji Watakuni (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dahl, Robert A. (1970). After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dahl, Robert A. (1982). Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dahl, Robert A. (1985). A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dahl, Robert A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dalton, Russell J., Wilhelm Bürklin, and Andrew Drummond (2001). “Public Attitudes Toward Direct Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, 12 (1): 151–153.Google Scholar
  27. Dalton, Russell J., Susan E. Scarrow, and Bruce E. Cain (2003). “New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions.” In Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Bruce E. Cain, Russell J. Dalton, and Susan E. Scarrow, Chap. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. de Tocqueville, Alexis (1835–1840). Democracy in America. New York: Knopf, 1945.Google Scholar
  29. Deutsch, Karl W. (1953). Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Deutsch, Karl W. (1954). Political Community at the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  31. Deutsch, Karl W., Sidney A. Burrell, Robert A. Kann, Maurice Lee, Jr., Martin Lichterman, Raymond E. Lindgren, Frances L. Loewenheim, and Richard W. Van Wagenen (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Diamond, Jared (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Diamond, Larry Jay, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset (1988). Democracy in Developing Countries. Boulder, CO: Rienner.Google Scholar
  34. Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  35. Drutman, Lee (2017). “The Devastating Power of the Presidency,” Los Angeles Times, March 5.Google Scholar
  36. Engels, Friedrich (1884). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: Pathfinder, 1972.Google Scholar
  37. Etzioni, Amitai (1965). Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
  38. Etzioni, Amitai (1993). The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Age. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  39. Etzioni, Amitai (2004). From Empire to Community: A New Approach to International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Evans, Peter (2005). “Counterhegemonic Globalization: Transnational Social Movements in the Contemporary Global Political Economy.” In The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization, ed. Thomas Janoski, Robert R. Alford, Alexander M. Hicks, and Mildred A. Schwartz, Chap. 32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Falk, Richard (1998). On Human Governance. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  42. Fanon, Franz (1952). Black Skins, White Masks. New York: Grove, 1967.Google Scholar
  43. Fanon, France (1961). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove, 1968.Google Scholar
  44. Fiorina, Morris P. (2011). Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  45. Florini, Ann, and Carlos Pascual (2007). “United Nations Reform.” In Global Governance Reform: Breaking the Stalemate, ed. Colin I. Bradford, Jr., and Johannes F. Linn, Chap. 4. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  46. Frohlich, Norman, Joe A. Oppenheimer, Jeffrey Smith, and Oran R. Young (1978). “A Test of Downsian Voter Rationality: 1964 Presidential Voting,” American Political Science Review, 72 (1):178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fukuyama, Francis (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Gates, Jeff (2000). Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street from Wall Street; A Populist Vision for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
  49. Goffman, Alice (2015). On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Haas, Michael, ed. (2011). Barack Obama: The Aloha Zen President; How a Son of the 50th State May Revitalize America Based on 12 Multicultural Principles. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  52. Haas, Michael (2014c). Neobehavioral Political Science: A Profession’s Fascinating History, Subfields, Paradigms, Research Agendas, Policy Applications, and Future. Los Angeles: Publishinghouse for Scholars.Google Scholar
  53. Haas, Michael (2016). How to Abolish Racism: Lessons from the State of Hawai’i. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  54. Haas, Michael (2017a). International Relations Theory: Competing Empirical Paradigms. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  55. Haas, Michael (2017b). Political Science Revitalized: Filling the Jigsaw Puzzle with Metatheory. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  56. Habermas, Jürgen (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols. Boston: Beacon, 1985.Google Scholar
  57. Han, Hahrie (2016). “The Organizational Roots of Political Activism: Field Experiments on Creating a Relational Context,” American Political Science Review, 110 (2): 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Harris, Marvin (1968). The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  59. Held, David (1993). “Democracy: From City-States to Cosmopolitan Order?” In Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West, ed. David Held, Chap. 1. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Held, David (1995). Democracy and the Global Order. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  61. Held, David (2006). Models of Democracy, 3rd edn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Holland, Joshua (2017). “Your Guide to the Sprawling New Anti-Trump Resistance Movement,” The Nation, February 6. Accessed January 20, 2018.Google Scholar
  63. Horkheimer, Max (1947). Eclipse of Reason. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Huntington, Samuel P. (1975). “The United States.” Chapter III in Michael J. Crozier, Samuel P. Huntington, and Joji Watakuni, The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Hutchins, Robert Maynard, Giuseppe Antonio Borghese, Mortimer J. Adler, Stringfellow Barr, Albert J. Guerand, Rexford G. Tugwell, Harold A. Innes, Wilber G. Katz, Charles H. McIlwain, Robert Redfield, and Erich von Kahler (1948). Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. Jacobs, Alan M., and J. Scott Matthews (2017). “Policy Attitudes in Institutional Context: Rules, Uncertainty, and the Mass Politics of Public Investment,” American Journal of Political Science, 61 (1): 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kah, Gary H. (1991). En Route to Global Occupation. Lafayette, LA: Huntington House.Google Scholar
  68. Kaldor, Mary (1999). New and Old Wars. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  69. Kennedy, John F. (1961). Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. Washington, DC: State Department Publication 7277.Google Scholar
  70. Kennedy, John F. (1962). Blueprint for the Peace Race: Outline of Basic Provisions of a Treaty on General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. Washington, DC: U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Publication 4, General Series 3, May 3.Google Scholar
  71. Klein, Naomi (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  72. Krinsky, John, and Colin Barker (2009). “Movement Strategizing as Developmental Learning: Perspectives from Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” In Culture, Social Movements, and Protest, ed. Hank Johnston, Chap. 9. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  73. Krotz, Ulrich (2010). “Regularized Intergovernmentalism: France-Germany and Beyond (1963–2009),” Foreign Policy Analysis, 6 (2): 147–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lebovic, Sam (2016). Free Speech and Unfree News: The Paradox of Press Freedom in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lijphart, Arend (1968). “Typologies of Democratic Systems,” Comparative Political Studies, 1 (1): 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lindblom, Charles E. (1959). “The Science of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review, 19 (2): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lowi, Theodore (1969). The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  78. Lowi, Theodore (1979). The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  79. Mann, Thomas E., and Norman J. Ornstein (2012). It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  80. Marchetti, Raffaele (2008b). Stakeholder Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels (1846). The German Ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1965.Google Scholar
  82. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels (1848). Manifesto of the Communist Party. In The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Robert C. Tucker, pp. 335–362. New York: Norton, 1967.Google Scholar
  83. Mau, Steffan (2003). Moral Economy of Welfare States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. McAdam, Douglas, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly (2001). Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Merriam, Charles E. (1931). The Making of Citizens: A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  86. Merriam, Charles E. (1934). Civic Education in the United States. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  87. Milner, Henry (2010). The Internet Generation: Enraged Citizens of Political Dropouts? Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  88. Mitrany, David (1943). A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organizations, Rev. edn. Chicago: Quadrangle, 1966.Google Scholar
  89. Moran, Sean (2017). “20 Ways Trump Unraveled the Administrative State,” Breitbart News (, April 11. Accessed July 16, 2017.
  90. Morgan, Lewis Henry (1870). Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mulieri, Alessandro (2015). “Can We Democratize Global Governance? Two Scenarios Based on a Narrative Approach.” In Global Governance and Democracy: A Multidisciplinary Analysis, ed. Jan Wouters, Antoon Braevkman, Matthias Lievers, and Emilie Bécault, Chap. 2. Northampton, MA: Elgar.Google Scholar
  92. Norman, Richard (2004). On Humanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Oberschall, Anthony (1973). Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  94. Oshima, Harry (1970). “Income Inequality and Economic Growth in the Post-War Experience of Asian Countries,” Malayan Economic Review, 15 (2): 7–41.Google Scholar
  95. Parenti, Michael (1973). Democracy for the Few, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2010.Google Scholar
  96. Park, Robert Ezra (1939). “The Nature of Race Relations.” In Race Relations and the Race Problem, ed. Edgar T. Thompson, pp. 3–45. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Park, Robert Ezra (1950). Race and Culture: Essays in the Sociology of Contemporary Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  98. Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rauch, Jonathan (1994). Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  100. Rosanvallon, Pierre (2013). The Society of Equals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Scheidel, Walter (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Scheuerman, William E. (2014). “Cosmopolitanism and the World State,” Review of International Studies, 40 (3): 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schmitz, Hans Peter (2006). Transnational Mobilization and Democratic Regime Change: Africa in Comparative Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Skolnick, Jerome H. (1969). The Politics of Protest. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  105. Snyder, Glenn, and Charles Tilly (1972). “Hardship and Collective Violence in France, 1830 to 1960,” American Sociological Review, 37 (4): 520–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Somin, Ilya (2016). Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter, 2nd edn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Sørensen, Eva, and Jacob Torfing, eds. (2007). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  108. Stevens, John Paul (2014). Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  109. Super, David A. (2017). “Leave the Constitution Alone,” Los Angeles Times, March 15.Google Scholar
  110. Tilly, Charles (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  111. Trent, Judith S., and Robert V. Friedenberg (2008). Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices, 6th edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  112. Tulchin, Allan (2010). That Men Would Praise the Lord: The Triumph of Protestantism in Nimes, 1530–1570. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Turner, Ralph, and Lewis Killian (1987). Collective Behavior, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  114. von Moltke, Konrad (2001), “The Organization of the Impossible,” Global Environmental Politics, 1(1), 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Weiss, Thomas G. (2009). “What Happened to the Idea of World Government,” International Studies Quarterly, 53 (2): 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wendt, Alexander (2003). “Why a World State Is Inevitable,” European Journal of International Relations, 9 (4): 491–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Whitman, Jim (2005). The Limits of Global Governance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Haas
    • 1
  1. 1.Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations