Advertisement

From BPM to IoT

  • Sylvain Cherrier
  • Varun Deshpande
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 308)

Abstract

IoT’s presence is increasingly felt. There are already more connected devices to the internet than total human population and sales are starting to rise. As there is extensive research ongoing in order to propose a global architecture to build IoT applications, the domain will rise as soon as a common solution will be widespread. Further, we would need to integrate IoT applications into the legacy data processing solutions. Business Process Model, for example, is a common concept used to build and compose software. Could the Internet of Things become an active shareholder in this approach? The Internet of Things, unlike BPM (which is more static), has specific constraints and peculiar organisations based on its dynamicity and heterogeneity. We propose, in this paper, a gateway to adapt our own IoT platform to the needs of the BPM approach and we also try to analyse the difficulties that may arise therein.

Keywords

BPM IoT BPM in IoT 

References

  1. 1.
    Panagacos, T.: The ultimate guide to business process management: everything you need to know and how to apply it to your organization (2012). https://books.google.fr/books?id=AyCQMQEACAAJ
  2. 2.
    Danylevych, O., Karastoyanova, D., Leymann, F.: Service networks modelling: an SOA & BPM standpoint. J. UCS 16(13), 1668–1693 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mendling, J., Recker, J.C., Wolf, J.: Collaboration features in current BPM tools. EMISA Forum 32(1), 48–65 (2012). Gesellschaft für Informatik eVGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, E.: Who needs the Internet of Things? (2016). https://www.linux.com/news/who-needs-internet-things
  5. 5.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128610001568 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Di Francesco, M., Passarella, A.: Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Ad Hoc Netw. 7(3), 537–568 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilde, E.: Putting things to rest, School of Information (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guinard, D., Trifa, V., Mattern, F., Wilde, E.: From the Internet of Things to the web of things: resource-oriented architecture and best practices. In: Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F. (eds.) Architecting the Internet of Things, pp. 97–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19157-2_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guinard, D., Trifa, V., Wilde, E.: A resource oriented architecture for the web of things. In: Proceedings of IoT (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spiess, P., Karnouskos, S., Guinard, D., Savio, D., Baecker, O., Souza, L., Trifa, V.: SOA-based integration of the Internet of Things in enterprise services. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS 2009, pp. 968–975. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shelby, Z., Bormann, C.: 6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet. Wiley, Chichester (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shelby, Z.: Embedded web services. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 17(6), 52–57 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao, S., Chendanda, D., Deshpande, C., Lakkundi, V.: Implementing LWM2M in constrained IoT devices. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Wireless Sensors (ICWiSe), pp. 52–57. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Datta, S.K., Gyrard, A., Bonnet, C., Boudaoud, K.: oneM2M architecture based user centric IoT application development. In: 2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), pp. 100–107. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krco, S., Pokric, B., Carrez, F.: Designing IoT architecture(s): a European perspective. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 79–84. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., Ayyash, M.: Internet of Things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(4), 2347–2376 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kannengiesser, U., Neubauer, M., Heininger, R.: Subject-oriented BPM as the glue for integrating enterprise processes in smart factories. In: Ciuciu, I., et al. (eds.) OTM 2015 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 9416, pp. 77–86. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26138-6_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cherrier, S., Salhi, I., Ghamri-Doudane, Y., Lohier, S., Valembois, P.: BeC\(^3\): Behaviour crowd centric composition for IoT applications. Mob. Netw. Appl. 19, 1–15 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0481-8 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glouche, Y., Couderc, P.: A smart waste management with self-describing objects. In: Leister, W., Jeung, H., Koskelainen, P. (eds.) The Second International Conference on Smart Systems, Devices and Technologies (SMART 2013), Rome, Italy. IARIA, June 2013. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00924270
  21. 21.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlisside, J.: Design Patterns. Addison-Wesley Professional Computing SeriesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris-Est, Laboratoire d’Informatique Gaspard Monge (CNRS: UMR8049)Champs-sur-MarneFrance
  2. 2.Université Paris-Est Marne-la-ValléeChamps-sur-MarneFrance

Personalised recommendations