Advertisement

The Importance of Trust in a Digital Europe: Reflections on the Sharing Economy and Blockchains

  • Robin Teigland
  • Håkan Holmberg
  • Anna Felländer
Chapter

Abstract

For Teigland, Holmberg and Felländer, the sharing economy offers people new opportunities for value creation in the European Union. With the help of digital platforms, participants in the sharing economy may cut out traditional intermediaries resulting in a cheaper exchange of goods and services. However, a vacuum of responsibility arises in the wake of digitalization, eroding provisions of labor and consumer law. Creating trust in the digital environment is a huge challenge for the sharing economy. The Union can engage more intensively in the digitalization of European societies by promoting economic growth and enhancing the capacity for innovation. The authors consider it essential to develop a ‘digital presence’ to prevent the European perspective on democracy and freedom of expression losing out to global actors.

References

  1. Acheson, N. (2017). China’s ICO ban: Understandable, reasonable and (probably) temporary. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://www.coindesk.com/chinas-ico-ban-understandable-reasonable-probably-temporary/
  2. Amin, H. (2017, October 24). Singapore won’t regulate cryptocurrencies, Central Bank chief says. Bloomberg. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-24/singapore-won-t-regulate-cryptocurrencies-remains-alert-to-risk
  3. Aru, I. (2016). Estonian government adopts blockchain to secure 1 Mln health records. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://cointelegraph.com/news/estonian-government-adopts-blockchain-to-secure-1-mln-health-records
  4. Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentov, I., Gabizon, A., & Mizrahi, A. (2016). Cryptocurrencies without proof of work. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (pp. 142–157), 9604 LNCS(240258).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicchieri, C., Duffy, J., & Tolle, G. (2004). Trust among strangers. Philosophy of Science, 71(3), 286–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BitFury Group. (2015). Proof of stake versus proof of work. Retrieved from http://bitfury.com/content/5-white-papers-research/pos-vs-pow-1.0.2.pdf
  8. Botsman, R. (2012). The currency of the new economy is trust. TED Talks. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/rachel_botsman_the_currency_of_the_new_economy_is_trust
  9. Eurobarometer. (2014). E-communications and the digital single market. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2062_84_2_438_ENG
  10. European Banking Authority. (2016). Opinion of the European banking authority on the EU Commission’s proposal to bring virtual currencies into the scope of Directive. (EU) 2015/849 (4AMLD).Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020 final, Brussels, 3 March 2010.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2016a). A European agenda for the collaborative economy. COM(2016) 356 final, Brussels, 2 June 2016.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2016b). Proposal for a directive amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing and amending Directive 2009/101/EC. COM(2016) 450 final, Strasbourg, 5 July 2016.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2017). A connected digital single market for all. COM(2017) 228 final, Brussels, 10 May 2017.Google Scholar
  15. European Parliament. (2016). European Parliament resolution of 26 May 2016 on virtual currencies, 2016/2007(INI). Provisional edition (pp. 1–4).Google Scholar
  16. European Parliament & the Council of the EU. (2013). Establishing Horizon 2020—The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 2010(1291), 104–173.Google Scholar
  17. European Parliament & the Council of the EU. (2016, March). Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Communities, 2014(2014), 1–88.Google Scholar
  18. FATF. (2015). Guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual currencies. Retrieved from http://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfgeneral/documents/guidance-rba-virtual-currencies.html
  19. Felländer, A., Ingram, I., & Teigland, R. (2015). The sharing economy: Embracing change with caution. Stockholm: Entreprenörskapsforum.Google Scholar
  20. Fleder, M., Kester, M. S., & Sudeep, P. (2014). Bitcoin transaction graph analysis. arXiv:1502.01657 (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  21. Fölster, S. (2014). De nya jobben i automatiseringens tidevarv. Stockholm: Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning.Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Ho, D. C. (2000). Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frost and Sullivan. (2017). The 2017 global blockchain startup map. Retrieved from https://ww2.frost.com/news/press-releases/frost-sullivan-identifies-2017-global-blockchain-startup-map/
  24. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T., & Weinhardt, C. (2016). Trust in the sharing economy. Die Unternehmung: Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, 70(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Higgins, S. (2017). The EU is building a ‘financial transparency gateway’ with blockchain. CoinDesk. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://www.coindesk.com/eu-developing-prototype-blockchain-platform-public-company-data/
  28. Hilerman, G. (2016). State of blockchain Q1 2016: Blockchain funding overtakes Bitcoin. CoinDesk. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://www.coindesk.com/state-of-blockchain-q1-2016/
  29. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM, 42(4), 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hong, I. B., & Cho, H. (2011). The impact of consumer trust on attitudinal loyalty and purchase intentions in B2C e-marketplaces: Intermediary trust vs. seller trust. International Journal of Information Management, 31(5), 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Saarinen, L. (1999). Consumer trust in an internet store: A cross culture validation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5, 1–35.Google Scholar
  32. Kastelein, R. (2016). Polish government makes plans to explore blockchain. Blockchain News. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from http://www.the-blockchain.com/2016/06/24/polish-government-makes-plans-explore-blockchain/
  33. Kempe, M. (2017). The land registry in the blockchain. https://chromaway.com/papers/Blockchain_Landregistry_Report_2017.pdf
  34. Korjus, K. (2017). Estonia could offer ‘estcoins’ to e-residents. Medium. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://medium.com/e-residency-blog/estonia-could-offer-estcoins-to-e-residents-a3a5a5d3c894
  35. Lauterbach, D., Truong, H., Shah, T., & Adamic, L. (2009). Surfing a web of trust: Reputation and reciprocity on couchsurfing.com. Computational Science and Engineering, CSE’09. International Conference, 4, 346–353.Google Scholar
  36. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  37. Medium. (2017). 21 companies leveraging blockchain for identity management and authentication. Medium. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from https://medium.com/@LetsTalkPayments/21-companies-leveraging-blockchain-for-identity-management-and-authentication-d09d88e3a4bf
  38. Möhlmann, M. (2016). Sharing economy: Building trust in P2P online marketplaces. New York Computer Science and Economics Day. New York.Google Scholar
  39. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin.Org. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  40. NEWSBTC. (2017). The ‘big four’ audit firms and their contribution to blockchain technology. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/07/07/big-four-audit-firms-contribution-blockchain-technology/
  41. Palmer, D. (2016). Blockchain startup to secure 1 million e-Health records in Estonia. CoinDesk. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://www.coindesk.com/blockchain-startup-aims-to-secure-1-million-estonian-health-records/
  42. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2002). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 667–675). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar
  43. Ratnasingham, P. (1998). The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Internet Research, 8(4), 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raza, A. (2016). Current state of Bitcoin in Russia. The Merkle. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://themerkle.com/bitcoin-in-russia-2/
  45. Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Silver, A. (2017). Russia to block access to cryptocurrency exchanges’ websites. The Register. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/10/russia_to_ban_cryptocurrency_exchanges/
  47. Statens Offentliga Utredningar. (2016). Taxi och samåkning—i dag, i morgon och i övermorgon. SOU 2016:86.Google Scholar
  48. Stewart, K. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the world wide web. Organisation Science, 14(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9). Retrieved August 28, 2016, from http://pear.accc.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/548
  51. Tual, S. (2016). Blockchain energy P2P sharing project Share&Charge going into live Beta. Medium. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from https://blog.slock.it/blockchain-energy-p2p-sharing-project-share-charge-going-into-live-beta-ad4e069e79d
  52. UK Government Office for Science. (2015). Distributed ledger technology: Beyond block chain.Google Scholar
  53. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. (2017). Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO, 21(81207).Google Scholar
  54. Werbach, K. D., & Cornell, N. (2017). Contracts Ex Machina. Duke Law Journal, 67, 1–57.Google Scholar
  55. Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 453–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu, G., Hu, X., & Wu, Y. (2010). Effects of perceived interactivity, perceived web assurance and disposition to trust on initial online trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Teigland
    • 1
  • Håkan Holmberg
    • 2
  • Anna Felländer
    • 3
  1. 1.Stockholm School of EconomicsStockholmSweden
  2. 2.UppsalaSweden
  3. 3.StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations