Advertisement

Venomous and Dangerous Marine Animals

  • Olaf Rusoke-Dierich
Chapter

Abstract

A variety of different life forms arose throughout evolution. An important aspect for survival was defence and food supply. Protection was provided by camouflage or by defensive mechanism. Some animals developed venom or poison, so they became unattractive as prey. Some fish have spines, which contain venom; some other animals have poison within the body to make them unattractive for consumption. Especially sick, weak animals or carrion are preferred prey. By this, nature on the one hand is cleaned up, and on the other hand, it guarantees “strong, healthy” animals to survive and reproduce. At the end of the food chain are predators like sharks, barracudas and humans who are benefiting from marine food sources. A variety of marine animals could harm divers by their venom, electrocution or biting. But mainly carelessness is putting divers at risk. Either unintentional touching of venomous fish or provocation of marine life is a major cause of injuries by marine animals. But even if divers behave prudently, injuries and envenomation may occur.

References

  1. 1.
    Australian Resuscitation Council – ARC Guideline 9.4.5. Envenomation—Jellyfish stings 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fenner PJ, Williamson JA, Burnett JW, et al. The “Irukandji syndrome” and acute pulmonary oedema. Med J Aust. 1988;149(3):150–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halford ZA, Yu PYC, Likeman RK, Hawley-Molly JS, Bingham CT, Bingham JP. Cone Shell envenomation: epidemiology, pharmacology and medical care. Diving Hyperb Med. 2015;45(3):200–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loten C, Scokes B, Worsley D, et al. A randomised controlled trial of hot water (45 °C) immersion versus ice packs for pain relief in blue bottle stings. Med J Aust. 2006;184:329–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramasamy S, Isbister GK, Seymour JE, Hodgson WC. The IN VITRO effects of two (CHIRONEX FLECKERI and CHIROPSALMUS sp.) venoms: efficacy of box jellyfish antivenom. Toxicon. 2003;41:703–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Antibiotic Expert Group Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic. Version 14 Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Ltd; 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Auerbach PS. Marine envenomations. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(7):486–93.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Resuscitation Council – ACR9.4.7. Envenomation – fish stings July 2014.Google Scholar
  4. Resuscitation Council – ARC Guideline 9.4.1. Australien Snake Bite 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Resuscitation Council – ARC Guideline 9.4.1. Australien Snake Bite 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Australian Resuscitation Council – ARC Guideline 9.4.8. Pressure Bandage Technique 2011.Google Scholar
  7. C. Dangerous Marine Creatures: Field Guide For Medical Treatment. 2nd ed. 1995. 63–68, 75–79, 239–249.Google Scholar
  8. Edmonds C. Dangerous Marine Creatures: Field Guide For Medical Treatment. 2nd ed. Flagstaff: Best Pub. Co.; 1995. p. 63–68, 75–79, 239–249.Google Scholar
  9. Fenner PJ, Lewin M. Sublingual glyceryl trinitrate as prehospital treatment for hypertension in Irukandji syndrome. Med J Aust. 2003;179(11–12):655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman MA, Fleming LE, Fernandez M, Bienfang P, Schrank K, Dickey R, et al. Ciguatera fish poisoning: treatment, prevention and management. Mar Drugs. 2008;6(3):456–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gwee MC, Gopalakrishnakone P, Yuen R, et al. A review of stonefish venoms and toxins. Pharmacol Ther. 1994;64(3):509–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Habermehl G. Gift-Tiere und ihre Waffen. 5th ed. Berlin: Springer; 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Isbister GK, Kiernan MC. Neurotoxic marine poisoning. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(4):219–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lalwani K. Animal toxins: Scorpaenidae and stingrays. BJA: Br J Anaesth. 1995;75:247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mers D. Gifte im Riff, vol. 1989. Stuttgart: Wissentschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 1989.Google Scholar
  16. Moczydlowski EG. The molecular mystique of tetrodotoxin. Toxicon. 2013;63:165–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Morrow JD, Margolies GR, Rowland J. Evidence that histamine is the causative toxin of scombroid-fish poisoning. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(11):716–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stommel EW, Watters MR. Marine Neurotoxins: Ingestible Toxins. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2004;6(2):105–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sun KO. Management of puffer fish poisoning. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75(4):500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tiong K. Irukandji syndrome, catecholamines, and mid-ventricular stress cardiomyopathy. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:334–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Watters MR, Stommel EW. Marine neurotoxins: Envenomations and contact toxins. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2004;6:115–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Welfare P, Little M, Pereira P, Seymour J. An in-vitro examination of the effect of vinegar on discharged nematocysts of Chironex Fleckeri. Diving and hyperbaric medicine : the journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society. 2014;44(1):30–4.Google Scholar
  23. Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW. Venomous and poisonous marine animals: medical and biological handbook. Sydney: U NEW SOUTH WALES P; 1996. p. 106–17, 374–87, 418–22Google Scholar
  24. Winkel KD, Tibballs J, Molenaar P, Lambert G, Coles P, Ross-Smith M, Wiltshire C, Fenner PJ, Gershwin LA, Hawdon GM, et al. Cardiovascular actions of the venom from the Irukandji (CARUKIA BARNESI) jellyfish: effects in human, rat and guinea-pig tissues in vitro and in pigs IN VIVO. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005;32:777–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olaf Rusoke-Dierich
    • 1
  1. 1.TownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations