SmartCom 2017: Smart Computing and Communication pp 427-437 | Cite as
Improved Three-Dimensional Model Feature of Non-rigid Based on HKS
Abstract
The recognition and retrieval of 3D models have been a hot spot in the field of computer vision. Since the non-rigid shapes can generate various deformations, the recognition and retrieval of non-rigid 3D models are more complex and challenging than rigid one. Therefore, the key to the recognition and retrieval of non-rigid 3D models is to extract a feature which obtains substantial description ability and stability. An improved HKS feature named NSIHKS (NSIHKS, new scale Invariance heat kernel signature) was used to describe the shape of models in the paper. NSIHKS contains intrinsic invariance, scale transformation invariance, robustness et al. Moreover it has good resistance even under faint noise. Firstly, the NSIHKS features of each model were extracted and processed with clustering algorithm. Secondly, an efficient algorithm of similarity measurement was designed on the basis of Ming distance. Finally, NSIHKS features of each model in the standard data set were compared via the aforementioned distance algorithm. Experimental results of standard data set in this field show that this feature has good effect on the application of non-rigid 3D model retrieval.
Keywords
3D model retrieval 3D non-rigid model Heat kernel signature Shape features ClusteringNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments to further improve the quality of this paper. This work is partially supported by the following projects in China: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61602116), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2015A030313635, No. 2017A030313388), Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (No. 2014A010103037), Special Fund for Science and Technology Innovation of Foshan City (No. 2015AG10008, No. 2014AG10001, No. 2016GA10156), Education Department of Guangdong Province (No. 2015KTSCX153) and Outstanding Youth Teacher Training Program of Foshan University (No. FSYQ201411).
References
- 1.Liu, M., Vemuri, B.C., Amari, S.I., Nielsen, F.: Shape retrieval using hierarchical total Bregman soft clustering. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34(12), 2407–2419 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Tangelder, J.W., Veltkamp, R.C.: A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods. Multimed. Tools Appl. 39(3), 441–471 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Li, B., Schreck, T., Godil, A., Alexa, M.: SHREC’12 track: sketch-based 3D shape retrieval. In: Euro Graphics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval, pp. 109–118 (2012)Google Scholar
- 4.Li, B., Lu, Y., Godil, A., Schreck, T., Aono, M., Johan, H., Saavedra, J.M., Tashiro, S.: SHREC’13 track: large scale sketch-based 3D shape retrieval. In: Euro Graphics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval, pp. 89–96 (2013)Google Scholar
- 5.Chew, B.-S., Chau, L.-P., He, Y., Wang, D., Hoi, S.C.H.: Spectral geometry image: image based 3D models for digital broadcasting applications. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 57(3), 636–645 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Yu, M., Atmosukarto, L., Leow, W.K., Huang, Z., Xu, R.: 3D model retrieval with morphing-based geometric and topological feature maps. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 656–658 (2003)Google Scholar
- 7.Vyshali, S., Subramanyam, M.V., Soundara Rajan, K.: Topology coding in spectral domain for effective medical image retrieval. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 3(11), 7884–7890 (2011)Google Scholar
- 8.Gao, Y., Tang, J., Li, H., Dai, Q.: View-based 3D model retrieval with probabilistic graph model. Neurocomputing 73(10-12), 1900–1905 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Yang, Y., Lin, H., Zhu, Q.: A review of 3D model retrieval based on content. Comput. J. 27(10), 1297–1310 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 10.Reuter, M., Wolter, F.E., Peinecke, N.: Laplace-Beltrami spectra as ‘Shape-DNA’ of surfaces and solids. Comput. Aided Des. 38(4), 342–366 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lian, Z.H., Godil, A., Bustos, B., et al.: A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. Pattern Recogn. 46(1), 449–461 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rustamov, R.M.: Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions for deformation invariant shape representation. In: Proceeding of the 5th Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, pp. 225–233. Eurographics Association Press, Aire-la-Ville (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Sun, J., Ovsjanikov, M., Guibas, L.: A concise and provably informative multi-scale signature based on heat diffusion. Comput. Graph. Forum 28(5), 1383–1392 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Zhou, Y., Zeng, F., Lu, Y., Zhou, Y.: Research on the rapid retrieval method of three-view model components in the manufacturing field. J. Sun Yat-sen Univ. (Natural Science Edition) (04) (2014)Google Scholar
- 15.Zhou, Y., Zeng, F.: 2D compressive sensing and multi-feature fusion for effective 3D shape retrieval. Inf. Sci. 409–410, 101–120 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ovsjanikov, M., Bronstein, A.M., Bronstein, M.M., et al.: Shape Google: a computer vision approach to isometry invariant shape retrieval. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 320–327 (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Bronstein, M.M., Kokkinos, I.: Scale-invariant heat kernel signatures for non-rigid shape recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, USA, pp. 1704–1711 (2010)Google Scholar
- 18.Kokkinos, I., Bronstein, M.M., Yuille, A.: Dense scale-invariant descriptors for images and surfaces. Center for Visual Computing, Ecole Centrale Paris (2012)Google Scholar
- 19.Shilane, P., Min, P., Kazhdan, M., et al.: The princeton shape benchmark. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications, Genova, Italy, pp. 167–178 (2004)Google Scholar
- 20.Boscaini, D., Masci, J., Melzi, S., Bronstein, M., Castellani, M., Vandergheynst, P.: Learning class-specific descriptors for deformable shapes using localized spectral convolutional networks. Comput. Graph Forum 34, 13–23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Fang, Y., Xie, J., Dai, G., Wang, M., et al.: 3D deep shape descriptor. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2319–2328 (2015)Google Scholar
- 22.Sinha, A., Bai, J., Ramani, K.: Deep learning 3D shape surfaces using geometry images. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9910, pp. 223–240. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Monti, F., Boscaini, D., Masci, J., et al.: Geometric deep learning on graphs and manifolds using mixture model CNNs (2016)Google Scholar
- 24.Qiu, M., Ming, Z., Li, J., Gai, K., Zong, Z.: Phase-change memory optimization for green cloud with genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Comput. 64(12), 3528–3540 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gai, K., Qiu, M., Sun, X.: A Survey on FinTech. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. PP, 1 (2017)Google Scholar