Advertisement

“Logic is the beginning of wisdom … not the end”: Using Star Trek to Teach Scientific Thinking

  • John N. A. Brown
Chapter

Abstract

To paraphrase Batman: “[humans] are a superstitious and cowardly lot”. We cling to our preconceptions against all evidence, literally unable to see the unexpected forest when we find that our field of view is crowded with an unanticipated number of trees. Our preconceptions and other cognitive biases weaken our individual ability to perceive the world around us. Telling fact from fantasy requires cooperation and formal, unintuitive thought. Scientific thinking may be the single greatest intellectual tool ever developed. Contrary to popular belief, it is not a way of proving things true, but a way of proving them false. It is not the work of a singular intellect, but a social activity. It is a method of altering the inherent iterative cycles of bias reinforcement and leaps of faith that we consider intuitive thinking, so that we explicitly define the weaknesses in our own ideas and count on others to help us find the flaws we’ve missed. But how does one teach this unintuitive style of thinking? How do we keep our students from exchanging one set of preconceptions and cognitive shortcuts for another? Personally, I use mental models with which they are already familiar. Personally, I use Star Trek.

Keywords

Anthropology-Based Computing (ABC) Cognitive biases Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Research methods Scientific thinking Star Trek 

Works Cited

  1. 1.
    Kozinets R (2001) Utopian Enterprise: articulating the meanings of Star Trek’s culture of consumption. J Consum Res 28(1):67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feynman RP (1969) What is science. Phys Teach 7(6):313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feynman RP (1955) The Value of Science. Eng Sci 19(3):13–15Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heinlein RA, Robinson S (2006) Variable star. Tom Doherty Associates, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown JNA (2015) Anthropology-based computing. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gladwell M (2005) Blink: the power of thinking without thinking. Little, Brown and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 39(4):341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aristotle (1902) Aristotle’s psychology (trans. of the De Anima and Parva Naturalia, w. Introd. and Notes). Swan Sonnenschien and Company, Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freud S (1961) The ego and the id. In: Strachey J (ed & trans). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Hogarth Press, London.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jung CG (1969) The structure of the psyche. In: Read H, Fordham M, Adler G, McGuire W (eds) The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 8. The structure and dynamics of the psyche, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broca P (1865) Sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 6(1):377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacLean PD (1990) The triune brain in evolution: role in paleocerebral functions. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown JNA (2016) Psychology and neurology: the surprisingly simple science of using your brain. In: Anthropology-based computing. Springer, Cham, pp 103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sagan C (2012) Dragons of Eden: speculations on the evolution of human intelligence. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Einstein A (1950) Memorial to Mme Curie. In: Out of my later years: the scientist, philosopher, and man portrayed through his own words. Philosophical Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown JNA (2013) It’s as easy as ABC. In: International work-conference on artificial neural networks. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jowett, B. (1871)..Plato: the republic. Retrieved from: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1497
  18. 18.
    Descartes R (1637) Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison, et chercher la vérité dans les sciences. Chez A.-A. Renouard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gardner DS (1932) Perception and memory of witnesses. Cornell Law Q 18:391Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heider KG (1988) The Rashomon effect: when ethnographers disagree. Am Anthropol 90(1):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kendall J (2008) The man who made lists: love, death, madness, and the creation of Roget’s Thesaurus. Putnam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roget PM (1825) Explanation of an optical deception in the appearance of the spokes of a wheel seen through vertical apertures. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 115:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bendazzi G (1994) Cartoons: one hundred years of cinema animation. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Henri Victor B, Erdmann RD (1898) Recherches psychologiques sur la lecture, fondées sur des expériences. L’année psychologique. 5:673–694. Retrieved from: http://www.persee.fr/doc/psy_0003-5033_1898_num_5_1_3097
  25. 25.
    Zuber BL, Stark L (1966) Saccadic suppression: elevation of visual threshold associated with saccadic eye movements. Exp Neurol 16(1):65–79.24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bill Finger B, Kane B (1939) The Case of the Chemical Syndicate, DETECTIVE COMICS #27, at 2 (DC Comics, May 1939)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Descartes R (1644) Principia Philosophiae. Sumtibus Friderici Knochii & FiliiGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Augustine of Hippo (circa 400) The city of god against the pagans, Book XI, Chapter 26Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feynman RP, Robbins J (1999) The pleasure of finding things out: the best short works of Richard P. Feynman.Perseus Books, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John N. A. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Good and Goodwill UX ResearchFacebook (via Rose)Menlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations