Advertisement

Surgical Management of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

  • Peter Sze Yuen Yu
  • Malcolm John Underwood
Chapter

Abstract

Functional tricuspid regurgitation remains a dilemma in patients presenting with left sided valvular disease. The decision for intervening is not clear cut in patients with mild/moderate regurgitation and in patients with severe regurgitation, placement of an annuloplasty ring may not be sufficient for a durable result due to leaflet tethering. There is no doubt that there is a trend for earlier intervention in patients with a dilated tricuspid annulus but minimal regurgitation but longer term follow up is required to assess the impact of this on long term outcomes.

Keywords

Functional tricuspid regurgitation Annuloplasty Leaflet techniques Tricuspid valve replacement 

References

  1. 1.
    Utsunomiya H, Itabashi Y, Mihara H, Berdejo J, Kobayashi S, Siegel RJ, Shiota T. Functional tricuspid regurgitation caused by chronic atrial fibrillation: a real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(1):e004897.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Messer AL, Hurst JW, et al. A study of the venous pulse in tricuspid valve disease. Circulation. 1950;1(3):388–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braunwald NS, Ross J Jr, Morrow AG. Conservative management of tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. Circulation. 1967;35(4 Suppl):I63–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Groves PH, Lewis NP, Ikram S, Maire R, Hall RJ. Reduced exercise capacity in patients with tricuspid regurgitation after successful mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral valve disease. Br Heart J. 1991;66(4):295–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groves PH, Ikram S, Ingold U, Hall RJ. Tricuspid regurgitation following mitral valve replacement: an echocardiographic study. J Heart Valve Dis. 1993;2(3):273–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sagie A, Schwammenthal E, Palacios IF, King ME, Leavitt M, Freitas N, Weyman AE, Levine RA. Significant tricuspid regurgitation does not resolve after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108(4):727–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izumi C, Iga K, Konishi T. Progression of isolated tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11(3):353–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Bedard P, Mesana TG. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with mitral prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128(2):278–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.048.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadeghi HM, Kimura BJ, Raisinghani A, Blanchard DG, Mahmud E, Fedullo PF, Jamieson SW, DeMaria AN. Does lowering pulmonary arterial pressure eliminate severe functional tricuspid regurgitation? Insights from pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(1):126–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.058.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hannoush H, Fawzy ME, Stefadouros M, Moursi M, Chaudhary MA, Dunn B. Regression of significant tricuspid regurgitation after mitral balloon valvotomy for severe mitral stenosis. Am Heart J. 2004;148(5):865–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simon R, Oelert H, Borst HG, Lichtlen PR. Influence of mitral valve surgery on tricuspid incompetence concomitant with mitral valve disease. Circulation. 1980;62(2 Pt 2):I152–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shafie MZ, Hayat N, Majid OA. Fate of tricuspid regurgitation after closed valvotomy for mitral stenosis. Chest. 1985;88(6):870–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Bonis M, Lapenna E, Pozzoli A, Nisi T, Giacomini A, Calabrese M, La Canna G, Pappalardo F, Miceli A, Glauber M, Barili F, Alfieri O. Mitral valve repair without repair of moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(6):2206–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van de Veire NR, Braun J, Delgado V, Versteegh MI, Dion RA, Klautz RJ, Bax JJ. Tricuspid annuloplasty prevents right ventricular dilatation and progression of tricuspid regurgitation in patients with tricuspid annular dilatation undergoing mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(6):1431–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.05.050.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kusajima K, Fujita T, Hata H, Shimahara Y, Miura S, Kobayashi J. Long-term echocardiographic follow-up of untreated 2+ functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23(1):96–103.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw065.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Porter A, Shapira Y, Wurzel M, Sulkes J, Vaturi M, Adler Y, Sahar G, Sagie A. Tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement: clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8(1):57–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dreyfus GD, Corbi PJ, Chan KM, Bahrami T. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilatation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(1):127–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.057.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuyama K, Matsumoto M, Sugita T, Nishizawa J, Tokuda Y, Matsuo T. Predictors of residual tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(6):1826–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Bonis M, Lapenna E, Sorrentino F, La Canna G, Grimaldi A, Maisano F, Torracca L, Alfieri O. Evolution of tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(4):600–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rajbanshi BG, Suri RM, Nkomo VT, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Burkhart HM, Stulak JM, Joyce LD, Li Z, Schaff HV. Influence of mitral valve repair versus replacement on the development of late functional tricuspid regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):1957–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.04.041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vaturi M, Kotler T, Shapira Y, Weisenberg D, Monakier D, Sagie A. Prevalence of late functional tricuspid regurgitation in degenerative mitral regurgitation surgery. J Heart Valve Dis. 2016;25(2):157–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mangoni AA, DiSalvo TG, Vlahakes GJ, Polanczyk CA, Fifer MA. Outcome following isolated tricuspid valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(1):68–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kwon DA, Park JS, Chang HJ, Kim YJ, Sohn DW, Kim KB, Ahn H, Oh BH, Park YB, Choi YS. Prediction of outcome in patients undergoing surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation following mitral valve surgery and role of tricuspid annular systolic velocity. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(5):659–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.047.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Staab ME, Nishimura RA, Dearani JA. Isolated tricuspid valve surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation following prior left heart valve surgery: analysis of outcome in 34 patients. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8(5):567–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim YJ, Kwon DA, Kim HK, Park JS, Hahn S, Kim KH, Kim KB, Sohn DW, Ahn H, BH O, Park YB. Determinants of surgical outcome in patients with isolated tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation. 2009;120(17):1672–8.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.849448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Badhwar V, Rankin JS, He M, Jacobs JP, Furnary AP, Fazzalari FL, O'Brien S, Gammie JS, Shahian DM. Performing concomitant tricuspid valve repair at the time of mitral valve operations is not associated with increased operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(2):587–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jeong DS, Park PW, Sung K, Kim WS, Lee YT. Determinants of late tricuspid regurgitation after aortic-mitral double valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(10):1643–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rankin JS, Hammill BG, Ferguson TB Jr, Glower DD, O'Brien SM, DeLong ER, Peterson ED, Edwards FH. Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(3):547–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chan V, Burwash IG, Lam BK, Auyeung T, Tran A, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Clinical and echocardiographic impact of functional tricuspid regurgitation repair at the time of mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(4):1209–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bertrand PB, Koppers G, Verbrugge FH, Mullens W, Vandervoort P, Dion R, Verhaert D. Tricuspid annuloplasty concomitant with mitral valve surgery: effects on right ventricular remodeling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(4):1256–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee JW, Song JM, Park JP, Lee JW, Kang DH, Song JK. Long-term prognosis of isolated significant tricuspid regurgitation. Circ J. 2010;74(2):375–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    De Meester P, De Cock D, Van De Bruaene A, Gabriels C, Buys R, Helsen F, Voigt JU, Herijgers P, Herregods MC, Budts W. Additional tricuspid annuloplasty in mitral valve surgery results in better clinical outcome. Heart. 2015;101(9):720–6.  https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Benedetto U, Melina G, Angeloni E, Refice S, Roscitano A, Comito C, Sinatra R. Prophylactic tricuspid annuloplasty in patients with dilated tricuspid annulus undergoing mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(3):632–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim JB, Yoo DG, Kim GS, Song H, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Lee JW. Mild-to-moderate functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing valve replacement for rheumatic mitral disease: the influence of tricuspid valve repair on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. Heart. 2012;98(1):24–30.  https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Munoz DR, Rosenhek R, Sjogren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2017;38(36):2739–91.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yiwu L, Yingchun C, Jianqun Z, Bin Y, Ping B. Exact quantitative selective annuloplasty of the tricuspid valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(3):611–4.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.113164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pfannmuller B, Doenst T, Eberhardt K, Seeburger J, Borger MA, Mohr FW. Increased risk of dehiscence after tricuspid valve repair with rigid annuloplasty rings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(5):1050–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang N, Phan S, Tian DH, Yan TD, Phan K. Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6(3):194–203.  https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.05.05.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang H, Liu X, Wang X, Lv Z, Liu X, Xu P. Comparison of outcomes of tricuspid annuloplasty with 3D-rigid versus flexible prosthetic ring for functional tricuspid regurgitation secondary to rheumatic mitral valve disease. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(11):3087–95.  https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.11.97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gatti G, Dell'Angela L, Morosin M, Maschietto L, Pinamonti B, Benussi B, Forti G, Nicolosi GL, Sinagra G, Pappalardo A. Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation: two different patterns of right heart reverse remodelling. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23(1):79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw047.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pfannmuller B, Davierwala P, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Garbade J, Mohr FW. Postoperative outcome of isolated tricuspid valve operation using arrested-heart or beating-heart technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(4):1218–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Galinanes M, Duarte J, de Caleya DF, Garcia-Dorado D, Fdez-Aviles F, Elbal LM. Fracture of the Carpentier-Edwards ring in tricuspid position: a report of three cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42(1):74–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kay HR, Hammond GL. Fracture of a prosthetic tricuspid annular ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;83(4):635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chang BC, Song SW, Lee S, Yoo KJ, Kang MS, Chung N. Eight-year outcomes of tricuspid annuloplasty using autologous pericardial strip for functional tricuspid regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(5):1485–92. discussion 1493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Milla F, Castillo JG, Varghese R, Chikwe J, Anyanwu AC, Adams DH. Rationale and initial experience with the Tri-Ad Adams tricuspid annuloplasty ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(4 Suppl):S71–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McCarthy PM, Bhudia SK, Rajeswaran J, Hoercher KJ, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(3):674–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rivera R, Duran E, Ajuria M. Carpentier’s flexible ring versus De Vega’s annuloplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89(2):196–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Matsuyama K, Matsumoto M, Sugita T, Nishizawa J, Tokuda Y, Matsuo T, Ueda Y. De Vega annuloplasty and Carpentier-Edwards ring annuloplasty for secondary tricuspid regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10(4):520–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tang GH, David TE, Singh SK, Maganti MD, Armstrong S, Borger MA. Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I577–81.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roshanali F, Saidi B, Mandegar MH, Yousefnia MA, Alaeddini F. Echocardiographic approach to the decision-making process for tricuspid valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(6):1483–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Parolari A, Barili F, Pilozzi A, Pacini D. Ring or suture annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation? A meta-analysis review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(6):2255–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Huang X, Gu C, Men X, Zhang J, You B, Zhang H, Wei H, Li J. Repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation: comparison between suture annuloplasty and rings annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(4):1286–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.10.037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hata H, Fujita T, Miura S, Shimahara Y, Kume Y, Matsumoto Y, Yamashita K, Kobayashi J. Long-term outcomes of suture vs. ring tricuspid annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation. Circ J. 2017;81(10):1432–8.  https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Guenther T, Mazzitelli D, Noebauer C, Hettich I, Tassani-Prell P, Voss B, Lange R. Tricuspid valve repair: is ring annuloplasty superior? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(1):58–65. discussion 65.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ghanta RK, Chen R, Narayanasamy N, McGurk S, Lipsitz S, Chen FY, Cohn LH. Suture bicuspidization of the tricuspid valve versus ring annuloplasty for repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation: midterm results of 237 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(1):117–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fukuda S, Gillinov AM, McCarthy PM, Stewart WJ, Song JM, Kihara T, Daimon M, Shin MS, Thomas JD, Shiota T. Determinants of recurrent or residual functional tricuspid regurgitation after tricuspid annuloplasty. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I582–7.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Park YH, Song JM, Lee EY, Kim YJ, Kang DH, Song JK. Geometric and hemodynamic determinants of functional tricuspid regurgitation: a real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study. Int J Cardiol. 2008;124(2):160–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dreyfus GD, Raja SG, John Chan KM. Tricuspid leaflet augmentation to address severe tethering in functional tricuspid regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34(4):908–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pettinari M, Bertrand P, Van Kerrebroeck C, Vandervoort P, Gutermann H, Dion R. Mid-term results of leaflet augmentation in severe tricuspid functional tethering. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(3):504–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Choi JB, Kim NY, Kim KH, Kim MH, Jo JK. Tricuspid leaflet augmentation to eliminate residual regurgitation in severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(6):e131–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rizzoli G, Vendramin I, Nesseris G, Bottio T, Guglielmi C, Schiavon L. Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis of intra-institutional results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(5):1607–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ratnatunga CP, Edwards MB, Dore CJ, Taylor KM. Tricuspid valve replacement: UK Heart Valve Registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):1940–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Filsoufi F, Anyanwu AC, Salzberg SP, Frankel T, Cohn LH, Adams DH. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(3):845–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.12.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Singh SK, Tang GH, Maganti MD, Armstrong S, Williams WG, David TE, Borger MA. Midterm outcomes of tricuspid valve repair versus replacement for organic tricuspid disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(5):1735–41. discussion 1741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.06.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Choi JW, Park EA, Lee W, Kim KH, Kim KB, Ahn H, Kim HK, Hwang HY. Changes in right ventricular volume and function after tricuspid valve surgery- tricuspid annuloplasty vs. tricuspid valve replacement. Circ J. 2016;80(5):1142–7.  https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Min SY, Song JM, Kim JH, Jang MK, Kim YJ, Song H, Kim DH, Lee JW, Kang DH, Song JK. Geometric changes after tricuspid annuloplasty and predictors of residual tricuspid regurgitation: a real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(23):2871–80.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales HospitalHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations