Quality Economic Losses in Brazil’s Pork Industry

  • Sivanilza Teixeira Machado
  • Irenilza de Alencar Naas
  • João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis
  • Pedro Luiz de Oliveira Costa Neto
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 262)

Abstract

The European Union, the United States, and Brazil respond to 74% of pork carcass production in the world. However, its productivity is affected by quality issues in the production process. Quality is the main driver in pork production to guarantee food security and food safety, besides reducing food losses. The objective of this paper investigated the causes of Brazil’s pork carcass condemnation and calculated its respective costs. Carcass condemnation is the most appropriate measure to assess quality in production. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed using data between 2010 and 2014. We applied the Pareto Analysis in order to identify the main parts rejected and the main reason for these rejects. To estimate the Brazilian industry costs, we calculated comparing losses with pork prices in the Brazilian market, in US dollars. The results showed that the cost of losses for the Pork Industry was estimated in US$ 112 million per period analyzed.

Keywords

Pork supply chains Food quality management Food losses 

References

  1. 1.
    USDA: Livestock and poultry: world markets and trade (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertol, T., Oliveira, E., Coldebella, A., Kawski, V., Scandolera, A., Warpechowski, M.: Meat quality and cut yield of pigs slaughtered over 100 kg live weight. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia 67(4), 1166–1174 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trienekens, J., Wognum, N.: Requirements of supply chain management in differentiating European pork chains. Meat Sci. 95(3), 719–726 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santiago, J., Caldara, F., Santos, V., Seno, L., Garcia, R., Almeida Paz, I.: Incidência da carne PSE (pale, soft, exsudative) em suínos em razão do tempo de descanso pré-abate e sexo. Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec, pp. 1739–1746 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perez, C., de Castro, R., Font i Furnols, M.: The pork industry: a supply chain perspective. Brit. Food J. 111(3), 257–274 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reis, J.G.D., Machado, S.T., Santos, R.C., Naais, I.D.A., Oliveira, R.V.: Financial losses in pork supply chain: a study of the pre-slaughter handling impacts. Engenharia Agricola 35(1), 163–170 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalla Costa, O.A., Ludke, J.V., Costa, M.J.R.P.d., Faucitano, L., Peloso, J.V., Dalla Roza, D.: Modelo de carroceria e seu impacto sobre o bem-estar e a qualidade da carne dos suínos. Cincia Rural, pp. 1418–1422 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Terlouw, C.: Stress reactions at slaughter and meat quality in pigs: genetic background and prior experience: a brief review of recent findings. Livestock Prod. Sci. 94(1), 125–135 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gosalvez, L., Averos, X., Valdelvira, J., Herranz, A.: Influence of season, distance and mixed loads on the physical and carcass integrity of pigs transported to slaughter. Meat Sci. 73(4), 553–558 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferguson, D., Warner, R.: Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Sci. 80(1), 12–19 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ritter, M., Ellis, M., Berry, N., Curtis, S., Anil, L., Berg, E., Benjamin, M., Butler, D., Dewey, C., Driessen, B., et al.: Transport losses in market weight pigs: I. a review of definitions, incidence, and economic impact. Prof. Anim. Sci. 25(4), 404–414 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGlone, J., Johnson, A., Sapkota, A., Kephart, R.: Establishing bedding requirements during transport and monitoring skin temperature during cold and mild seasons after transport for finishing pigs. Animals 4(2), 241–253 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Food and Agriculture Organization: Global Food Losses and Food Waste (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dora, M., Kumar, M., Van Goubergen, D., Molnar, A., Gellynck, X.: Food quality management system: reviewing assessment strategies and a feasibility study for European food small and medium-sized enterprises. Food Control 31(2), 607–616 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Costa, R.G., Santos, N.D., Sousa, W., Queiroga, R., Azevedo, P., Cartaxo, F.: Qualidade fisica e sensorial da carne de cordeiros de três genotipos alimentados com rações formuladas com duas relações volumoso: concentrado. Revista brasileira de Zootecnia 40(8), 1781–1787 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dias, A.C., Carraro, B.Z., Dallanora, D., Coser, F., Machado, G., Machado, I., Pinheiro, R., ROHR, S.: Manual brasileiro de boas práticas agropecuárias na produção de suínos (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mendes, A.A., Komiyama, C.M.: Estrategias de manejo de frangos de corte visando qualidade de carcaca e carne. Braz. J. Anim. Sci. 352–357 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sepulveda, W.S., Maza, M.T., Pardos, L.: Aspects of quality related to the consumption and production of lamb meat. Consumers versus producers. Meat Sci. 87(4), 366–372 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naas, I.d.A., Romanini, C.E.B., Salgado, D.D., Lima, K.A.O., Vale, M.M.d., Labigalini, M.R., Souza, S.R.L.d., Menezes, A.G., Moura, D.J.d.: Impact of global warming on beef cattle production cost in Brazil. Scientia Agricola 67(1), 01–08 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Castro Marino, L.H.F.: Gestão da qualidade e gestão do conhecimento: fatoreschave para produtividade e competitividade empresarial. XIII SIMPEP (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply: Servio de inspeo federal completa 100 anos (2015a)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply: Condenação de animais por espécie (2015b)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Costa, R.A., Leite, P.A.G., Barros, C.G.G., Lopes, G.M.B.: Principais causas de condenações em visceras comestiveis de suínos abatidos em um matadouro frigorifico sob inspeção estadual na região de Alagoinhas-BA. Veterinaria e Zootecnia 21(4), 616–623 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ahmed, M., Ahmad, N.: An application of pareto analysis and cause-and-effect diagram (CED) for minimizing rejection of raw materials in lamp production process. Manage. Sci. Eng. 5(3), 87–95 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brigano, M.V., Pacheco, G.D., Bridi, A.M., Oba, A., Fonseca, N.A.N., Silva, C.A.d.: Performance and carcass traits of pigs submitted to different programs of feed restriction from 30 to 118 kg. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37(8), 1398–1404 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fruet, A.P.B., Scortegagna, A., de Avila Fabricio, E., Kirinus, J.K., Drr, A.C., Nrnberg, J.L.: Perdas econômicas por condenação de órgãos suínos em matadouros sob serviço de inspeção municipal. Revista Eletrnica em Gesto, Educao e Tecnologia Ambiental 11(11), 2307–2312 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alberton, G.C., Mores, M.A.Z.: Interpretação de lesões no abate como ferramenta de diagnóstico das doenças respiratórias dos suínos. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 36(Supl 1), s95–s99 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ministry of Agriculture, L., Supply, F.: Manual de legislação: programas nacionais de saúde animal do Brasil manual técnico (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ludtke, C., Ciocca, J., Dandin, T., Barbalho, P., Vilela, J., Dalla Costa, O.: Abate humanitário suínos. WSPA, Rio de Janeiro (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alimentarius, C.: Higiene dos alimentos: Textos bsicos (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paranhos da Costa, M.J., Huertas, S.M., Gallo, C., Dalla Costa, O.A.: Strategies to promote farm animal welfare in Latin America and their effects on carcass and meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 92(3), 221–226 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bonesi, G.L., de Santana, E.H.W.: Fatores tecnológicos e pontos críticos de controle de contaminação em carcaças bovinas no matadouro. J. Health Sci. 10(2) (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Welker, C.A.D., Both, J.M.C., Longaray, S.M., Haas, S., Soeiro, M.L.T., Ramos, R.C.: Análise microbiológica dos alimentos envolvidos em surtos de doenças transmitidas por alimentos (DTA) ocorridos no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biocincias 8(1) (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sivanilza Teixeira Machado
    • 1
    • 2
  • Irenilza de Alencar Naas
    • 1
  • João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis
    • 1
  • Pedro Luiz de Oliveira Costa Neto
    • 1
  1. 1.Postgraduate Studies Program in Production EngineeringPaulista UniversitySão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Federal Institute of São Paulo, Campus SuzanoSuzanoBrazil

Personalised recommendations