Introduction: Protests in the Wake of the Great Recession

  • Nils C. Kumkar
Chapter
Part of the Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice book series (CPTRP)

Abstract

Kumkar argues that the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street have to be understood and analyzed as symptoms of the current crisis of US class society and that this analysis also helps to understand other current events like the election of Donald Trump as the president of the USA. He shows that a Bourdieu-inspired theory of practice approach allows for investigating how the specific protest-practices of these protest mobilizations are rooted in their participants’ lived experience of the crisis. A hermeneutic-reconstructive interpretation of these protest-practices therefore opens a window onto the changing morphology of the USA’s class structure. After an overview over the book’s structure, the chapter closes with a short summary of the first explosive phase of the two protest mobilizations.

Bibliography

  1. Adbusters. 2011. #OCCUPYWALLSTREET A Shift in Revolutionary Tactics. https://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters-blog/occupywallstreet.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2013.
  2. Andersen, Kurt. 2011. Person of the Year 2011: The Protester. Time, December 14.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, Colin. 2010. Class Struggle and Social Movement – An Effort at Untangling. Working Paper, Manchester Metropolitan University. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bz3wUg3e6r_4NzYzMzEzNGQtMjEyZC00NzJmLWJmMzItNDY2ZTIzM2VkYWE1/edit?hl=en&pli=1. Accessed 20 Nov 2017.
  4. Benski, Tova, Lauren Langman, Ignacia Perugorría, and Benjamín Tejerina. 2013. From the Streets and Squares to Social Movement Studies: What Have We Learned? Current Sociology 61 (4): 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlet, Chip. 2012. Reframing Populist Resentment in the Tea Party Movement. In Steep. The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, ed. Christine Trost and Lawrence Rosenthal, 47–66. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs, Michael. 2015. Has Protest Increased Since the 1970s? How a Survey Question Can Construct a Spurious Trend. The British Journal of Sociology 66 (1): 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blühdorn, Ingolfur. 2013. Simulative Demokratie: Neue Politik nach der postdemokratischen Wende. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Bohnsack, Ralf, Winfried Marotzki, and Michael Meuser. 2003. Hauptbegriffe qualitativer Sozialforschung: ein Wörterbuch. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979a. Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1979b. Public Opinion Does Not Exist. Communication and Class Struggle 1: 124–130.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1985. Sozialer Raum und „Klassen“ und Leçon sur la leçon: Zwei Vorlesungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1987. Sozialer Sinn: Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 1994. Die feinen Unterschiede: Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J.D. Wacquant. 1996. Die Ziele der reflexiven Soziologie: Chicago-Seminar, Winter 1987. In Reflexive Anthropologie, 95–249. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Burghart, Devin. 2012. View from the Top: Report on Six National Tea Party Organizations. In Steep. The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, ed. Lawrence Rosenthal and Christine Trost, 67–97. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carr, David. 2009. Cable Wars Are Killing Objectivity. The New York Times, April 20. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/business/media/20carr.html.
  18. CBS News. 2014. Tea Party Support Hits New Lows: Poll. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/tea-party-support-hits-new-lows-poll/. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.
  19. Chapman, Roger. 2012. Not Exactly an American Cup of Tea: The Foreign Context of the Nativist Movement Known as the Tea Party. In Social Scientists Explain the Tea Party Movement. With A Selection of Primary Documents, ed. Roger Chapman, 51–72. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  20. CNBC’s Rick Santelli’s Chicago Tea Party. 2009. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8k&feature=youtube_gdata_player. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.
  21. Cooper, Michael, and Megan Thee-Brenan. 2011. Public Views Congress as Top Culprit in Debt Debate, Poll Finds. The New York Times, August 4.Google Scholar
  22. Crossley, Nick. 2002. Making Sense of Social Movements. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Della Porta, Donatella. 2015. Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism Back into Protest Analysis. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frank, Thomas. 2012. To the Precinct Station – How Theory Met Practice…and Drove It Absolutely Crazy. The Baffler 21.Google Scholar
  25. Gould-Wartofsky, Michael A. 2015. The Occupiers: The Making of the 99 Percent Movement. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gramsci, Antonio. 1991. 3. Heft. In 2.-3. Heft, ed. Wolfgang Fritz Haug, vol. 2, 327–448. Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar
  27. Hall, Stuart. 1975. Introduction. In Paper Voices: The Popular Press and Social Change 1935–1965, ed. Anthony Charles H. Smith, 11–24. London: Chatton & Windus.Google Scholar
  28. Haltinner, Kristin. 2015. Individual Responsibility, Culture, or State Organized Enslavement? How Tea Party Activists Frame Racial Inequality. Sociological Perspectives 59 (2): 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hetland, Gabriel, and Jeff Goodwin. 2013. The Strange Disappearance of Capitalism from Social Movement Studies. In Marxism and Social Movements, ed. Colin Barker, Laurence Cox, John Krinsky, and Alf Gunvald, 83–102. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  30. Hoffmann-Riem, Christa. 1980. Die Sozialforschung einer interpretativen Soziologie: der Datengewinn. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 32 (2): 339–372.Google Scholar
  31. Husu, Hanna-Mari. 2012. Bourdieu and Social Movements: Considering Identity Movements in Terms of Field, Capital and Habitus. Social Movement Studies 12 (3): 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerbo, Harold R. 1982. Movements of ‘Crisis’ and Movements of ‘Affluence’: A Critique of Deprivation and Resource Mobilization Theories. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26 (4): 645–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King, Vera. 2014. Pierre Bourdieu als Analytiker des Sozialen: Methodologische und konzeptionelle Bezüge zur Psychoanalyse sowie sozialpsychologische Perspektiven im Werk Bourdieus. Sozialer Sinn. Zeitschrift für hermeneutische Sozialforschung 15 (1): 3–28.Google Scholar
  34. Kraushaar, Wolfgang. 2012. Der Aufruhr der Ausgebildeten: vom Arabischen Frühling zur Occupy-Bewegung. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.Google Scholar
  35. Kroll, Andy. 2011. How Occupy Wall Street Really Got Started. Mother Jones, October 17. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-international-origins?page=1. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.
  36. Langman, Lauren. 2013. Occupy: A New Social Movement. Current Sociology 61 (4): 510–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Last, Jonathan V. 2009. A Growing ‚Tea Party‘ Movement? Weekly Standard, Reprinted By CBSNews.com, April 3. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-215_162-4843055.html. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.
  38. Lorenzer, Alfred. 1977. Zum Verhältnis von objektiver und subjektiver Struktur. In Sprachspiel und Interaktionsformen, 195–217. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, Karl. 1971. Zur Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. In MEW 13, 3–160. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  40. Mayring, Philipp. 1993. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien-Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Milkman, Ruth, Stephanie Luce, and Penny Lewis. 2013. Changing the Subject: A Bottom-Up Account of Occupy Wall Street in New York City. New York: Joseph S. Murphy Institute for Worker Education and Labor Studies. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/562862-changing-the-subject-2.html. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.
  42. Müller, Hans-Peter. 2002. Die Einbettung des Handelns. Pierre Bourdieus Praxeologie. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 12 (2): 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. NYCGA. 2011. General Assembly Minutes 9/17/11. NYCGA (blog). September 17. http://www.nycga.net/2011/09/general-assembly-minutes-91711/. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  44. Oevermann, Ulrich. 1996. Beckett’s ‚Endspiel‘ als Prüfstein hermeneutischer Methodologie. Eine Interpretation mit den Verfahren der objektiven Hermeneutik. Oder: Ein objektiv-hermeneutisches Exerzitium. In Neue Versuche Becketts Endspiel zu verstehen. Sozialwissenschaftliche Interpretation nach Adorno, ed. Hans-Dieter König, 93–249. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2005. Klinische Soziologie auf der Basis der Methodologie der objektiven Hermeneutik: Manifest der objektiv hermeneutischen Sozialforschung. http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2005/540/. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.
  46. Przyborski, Aglaja, and Monika Wohlrab-Sahr. 2014. Qualitative Sozialforschung: ein Arbeitsbuch. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robbins, Liz. 2009. Tax Day Is Met With Tea Parties. The New York Times, April 16. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/16/us/politics/16taxday.html. Accessed 28 Oct 2017.
  48. Rokkan, Stein. 1999. Cleavage Structures and Party Systems. In State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan, ed. Peter Flora, Stein Kuhnle, and Derek Urwin, 275–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Roth, Roland. 1985. Rebellische Subjektivität: Herbert Marcuse und die neuen Protestbewegungen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  50. Schneider, Nathan. 2013. Thank You, Anarchy: Notes from the Occupy Apocalypse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Simmel, Georg. 1994. Philosophie des Geldes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  52. Skocpol, Theda, and Vanessa Williamson. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Solty, Ingar. 2013. Einleitung: Die Innen-Außen-Dialektik des American Empire in der globalen Krise. In Die USA unter Obama: Charismatische Herrschaft, soziale Bewegungen und imperiale Politik in der globalen Krise, 15–71. Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar
  54. Steinmetz, George. 2006. Bourdieu’s Disavowal of Lacan: Psychoanalytic Theory and the Concepts of ‘Habitus’ and ‘Symbolic Capital’. Constellations 13 (4): 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  56. van Gelder, Sarah Ruth. 2011. This Changes Everything: Occupy Wall Street and the 99% Movement. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Wacquant, Loïc J.D. 1996. Auf dem Weg zu einer Sozialpraxeologie. Struktur und Logik der Soziologie Pierre Bourdieus. In Reflexive Anthropologie, 17–93. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 2003. Leben für den Ring: Boxen im amerikanischen Ghetto. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2005. Shadowboxing with Ethnographic Ghosts: A Rejoinder. Symbolic Interaction 28 (3): 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williamson, Vanessa, Theda Skocpol, and John Coggin. 2011. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolf, Naomi. 2012. Revealed: How the FBI Coordinated the Crackdown on Occupy. The Guardian, December 29. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy. Accessed 28 Oct 2017
  62. Writers for the 99%. 2012. Occupying Wall Street: The inside Story of an Action That Changed America. Chicago: Haymarket Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils C. Kumkar
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations