Advertisement

Putting Health Back into the Healthcare System

  • Joachim P. Sturmberg
Chapter

Abstract

Currently, health systems are predominantly focused on disease, i.e. “non-health”. Thus, prevailing health systems are more aptly described as “disease management systems”. Viewed from a complex adaptive system perspective, the shift in focus on disease has left its mark; it detracted from the person experiencing the disease, something recognised early on by eminent clinicians, researchers and philosophers.

This chapter argues that we need to put health—defined as a personal experiential state—back at the center to achieve a seamlessly integrated health system. The health vortex model offers a tangible framework to guide the redesign of health systems that make health the driver in the pursuit of achieving highly integrated, constantly adapting health systems that meet the needs of the person/patient.

References

  1. 1.
    Sedivy R. Rokitansky und die Wiener Medizinische Schule. Von der Naturphilosophie zur Naturwissenschaft. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2004;154(19–20):443–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Husserl E. The basic problems of phenomenology: from the lectures, winter semester, 1910–1911. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayo Clinic Health Policy Centre. Building a New Vision for Health Care in America. Your Voice. New Vision. www.mayoclinic.org/healthpolicycenter.
  4. 4.
    Uexküll Tv, Pauli HG. The mind-body problem in medicine. Adv J Inst Adv Health. 1986;3(4):158–74.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cochrane A. Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflections on health services. London: The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pellegrino E, Thomasma D. A philosophical basis of medical practice. Towards a philosophy and ethic of the healing professions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century, 2001. Available at: www.iom.edu/file.asp?id=27184.
  8. 8.
    Jones P. Design for care: innovating healthcare experience. New York: Rosenfeld Media; 2013.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolko J. Design thinking comes of age. Harv Bus Rev. 2015;93(9):66–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sturmberg J. Health system redesign: how to make health care person-centered, equitable, and sustainable. New York: Springer; 2017.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sturmberg JP, O’Halloran DM, Martin CM. People at the centre of complex adaptive health systems reform. Med J Aust. 2010;193(8):474–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sturmberg JP, O’Halloran DM, Martin CM. Understanding health system reform - a complex adaptive systems perspective. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sturmberg JP, O’Halloran DM, Martin CM. Health care reform - the need for a complex adaptive systems approach. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, editors. Handbook of systems and complexity in health. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 827–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katerndahl DA. Is your practice really that predictable? Nonlinearity principles in family medicine. J Fam Pract. 2005;54(11):970–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kemeny M. Psychoneuroimmunology. In: Friedman H, editor. Oxford handbook of health psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 138–61.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sturmberg JP, Bennett JM, Martin CM, Picard M. ‘Multimorbidity’ as the manifestation of network disturbances. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(1):199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Slavich GM, Cole SW. The emerging field of human social genomics. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013;1(3):331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Foundation PresidentInternational Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for HealthNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations