Advertisement

Toward a Sustainable Theory of Human Trafficking and Contemporary Slavery

  • Laura DryjanskaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Human trafficking and modern slavery have become popular topics in our societies. Unsurprisingly, there is a quickly growing body of diversified research worldwide, including psychological perspectives. The time has come to propose a holistic outlook on these issues.

This theoretical chapter contains a discussion of ontological, epistemological, ethical, and aesthetic aspects of human trafficking. I discuss the relationship between human trafficking and modern slavery, subsequently outlining some major theoretical approaches. In the spirit of “connecting the dots” of diversified research, I suggest a possible sustainable theory applicable to research on human trafficking: the theory of social representations of Serge Moscovici. Some practical recommendations based on characteristics of alternative representations follow the discussion of reified and consensual universes. I also propose the integration of social representations with metarelational models, especially useful when facing moral aspects of human trafficking.

References

  1. Abbey, E., & Bastos, A. C. (2014). Creating bridges to the future: The poetic dimension through family life. Culture & Psychology, 20(2), 232–243.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X14527840Google Scholar
  2. Agustin, L. (2005). Migrants in the mistress’s house: Other voices in the “trafficking” debate. Social Politics, 12, 96–117.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, M. B., & Alessi, E. J. (2012). Human trafficking is more than sex trafficking and prostitution: Implications for social work. Affilia, 27(2), 142–152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109912443763Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. A., & Huesmann, L. R. (2003). Human aggression: A social-cognitive view. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Revised ed., pp. 296–323). London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Aradau, C. (2016). The perverse politics of four-letter words: Risk and pity in the securitisation of human trafficking. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(2), 251–277.Google Scholar
  6. Archer, M. S. (2013). Trafficking in human beings: Modern slavery. A sociological approach. Proceedings of the Working Group “Trafficking in human beings: Modern slavery”. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Bales, K. (2007). What predicts human trafficking? International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31(2), 269–279.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2007.9678771Google Scholar
  8. Banaji, M. R., Bazerman, M., & Chugh, D. (2003). How (Un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review, 81, 56–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell, S. (1994). Reading, writing and rewriting the prostitute body. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bernat, F. P., & Zhilina, T. (2010). Human trafficking: The local becomes global. Women & Criminal Justice, 20(1–2), 2–9.Google Scholar
  11. Calandruccio, G. (2005). A review of recent research on human trafficking in the Middle East. International Migration, 43(1–2), 267–299.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, C. A., Pinto, G., & Tapanya, S. (2014). Scaffolding one Thai youth’s drawing toward resilience. Culture & Psychology, 20(4), 453–476.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X14551293Google Scholar
  13. Chapkis, W. (1997). Performing erotic labor. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Chapkis, W. (2003). Trafficking, migration, and the law: Protecting innocents, punishing immigrants. Gender & Society, 17(6), 923–937.Google Scholar
  15. Choo, H. Y. (2006). Gendered modernity and ethnicized citizenship: North Korean settlers in contemporary South Korea. Gender & Society, 20(5), 576–604.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory. London, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Copley, L. (2014). Neutralizing their involvement: Sex traffickers’ discourse techniques. Feminist Criminology, 9(1), 45–58.Google Scholar
  18. Cupchik, G. C., & Winston, A. S. (1996). Confluence and divergence in empirical aesthetics, philosophy, and mainstream psychology. In M. P. Friedman & E. C. Carterette (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Cognitive ecology (2nd ed., pp. 61–85). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Danailova-Trainor, G., & Laczko, F. (2010). Trafficking in persons and development: Towards greater policy coherence. International Migration, 48(4), 38–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. De Regt, M. (2010). Ways to come, ways to leave: Gender, mobility, and il/legality among Ethiopian domestic workers in Yemen. Gender & Society, 24(2), 237–260.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209360358Google Scholar
  21. de Rosa, A. S. (1994). From theory to meta-theory in S.R.: The lines of argument of a theoretical-methodological debate. Social Science Information, 33(2), 273–304.Google Scholar
  22. de Sousa Santos, B. (2008). Another knowledge is possible: Beyond northern epistemologies. London, UK: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  23. Ditmore, M., & Thukral, J. (2012). Accountability and the use of raids to fight trafficking. The Anti-Trafficking Review, 1, 134–148.Google Scholar
  24. Ekberg, G. (2004). The Swedish law that prohibits the purchase of sexual services: Best practices for prevention of prostitution and trafficking in human beings. Violence Against Women, 10(10), 1187–1218.Google Scholar
  25. Ellemers, N. (2013). Connecting the dots: Mobilizing theory to reveal the big picture in social psychology (and why we should do this). European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1932Google Scholar
  26. Feingold, D. A. (2005). Human trafficking. Foreign Policy, 150, 26–30.Google Scholar
  27. Fiske, A. P. (2012). Horizon metarelational models: Configurations of social relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(5), 2–18.Google Scholar
  28. Fiske, S. T. (2006). Building bridges inside and outside social psychology: A case for lumping – Neatly. In P. A. M. Van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 47–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Fitzgibbon, K. (2003). Modern-Day Slavery?. African Security Review, 12(1), 81–89.Google Scholar
  30. Franklin, C. A., & Menaker, T. A. (2015). The impact of observer characteristics on blame assessments of prostituted female youth. Feminist Criminology, 10(2), 140–164.Google Scholar
  31. Gallagher, A. T. (2013). Ending impunity, securing justice and preventing exploitation: Human rights and human dignity in the fight against trafficking. Proceedings of the Working Group “Trafficking in Human Beings: Modern Slavery”. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  32. Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 375–391.Google Scholar
  33. Gillespie, A. (2012). Concluding comment: Contact without transformation: The context, process and content of distrust. In I. Markova & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 201–216). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Gillespie, A., Kadianaki, I., & O’Sullivan-Lago, R. (2012). Encountering alterity: Geo-graphic and semantic movements. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 695–709). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hodge, D. R., & Lietz, C. A. (2007). The international sexual trafficking of women and children. A review of the literature. Affilia–Journal of Women and Social Work, 22(2), 163–174.Google Scholar
  36. Hughes, D. M. (2001). The ‘Natasha’ trade: Transnational sex trafficking. National Institute of Justice Journal, 246, 9–15.Google Scholar
  37. Hughes, D. M., Chon, K. Y., & Ellerman, D. P. (2007). Modern-day comfort women: The U.S. Military, transnational crime, and the trafficking of women. Violence Against Women, 13(9), 901–922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jac-Kucharski, A. (2012). The determinants of human trafficking: A US case study. International Migration, 50(6), 150–165.Google Scholar
  39. Jodelet, D. (2008). Social representations: The beautiful invention. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 411–430.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00383.xGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, K. L. (2013). The new slave narrative: Advocacy and human rights in stories of contemporary slavery. Journal of Human Rights, 12(2), 242–258.Google Scholar
  41. Kamler, E. (2013). Negotiating narratives of human trafficking: NGOs, communication and the power of culture. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(1), 73–90.Google Scholar
  42. Kelly, L. (2005). “You can find anything you want”: A critical reflection on research on trafficking in persons within and into Europe. International Migration, 43(1–2), 235–265.Google Scholar
  43. Kemp, S., & Holmwood, J. (2012). Questioning contingency in social life: Roles, agreement and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(4), 403–424.Google Scholar
  44. King, G. (2004). Woman, child for sale: The new slavery in the 21st century. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. Lehti, M., & Aromaa, K. (2007). Trafficking in humans for sexual exploitation in Europe. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31(2), 123–145.Google Scholar
  46. Little, M. (2013, August 28). Conference on human trafficking. Norfolk, UK: Norwich.Google Scholar
  47. Lobasz, J. K. (2009). Beyond border security: Feminist approaches to human trafficking. Security Studies, 18(2), 319–344.Google Scholar
  48. Lusk, M., & Lucas, F. (2009). The challenge of human trafficking and contemporary slavery. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 25(1), 49–57,  https://doi.org/10.1080/17486830802514049Google Scholar
  49. Mapp, S. C. (2014). Human rights and social justice in a global perspective. An introduction to international social work. New York, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Markova, I. (2003). Change: An epistemological problem for social psychology. In I. Markova (Ed.), Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned in five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice, 32, 221–320.Google Scholar
  52. Molland, S. (2013). Tandem ethnography: On researching ‘trafficking’and ‘anti-trafficking’. Ethnography, 14(3), 300–323.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113491671Google Scholar
  53. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Mascovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–70). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Moscovici, S. (1990). The origin of social representations: A response to Michael. New Ideas in Psychology, 8(3), 383–388.Google Scholar
  55. Outshoorn, J. (2005). The political debates on prostitution and trafficking of women. Social Politics, 12(1), 141–155.Google Scholar
  56. Page, S. E. (2014). Where diversity comes from and why it matters? European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 267–279.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2016Google Scholar
  57. Pagliaro, S. (2012). On the relevance of morality in social psychology: An introduction to a virtual special issue. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 400–405.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1840Google Scholar
  58. Pagliaro, S., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2011). Sharing moral values: Anticipated ingroup respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1117–1129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Patterson, O. (1982). Slavery and social death. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Peled, E., & Parker, A. (2013). The mothering experiences of sex-trafficked women: Between here and there. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(4), 576–587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2012). Beyond harm, intention, and dyads: Relationship regulation, virtuous violence, and metarelational morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 189–193.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.670782Google Scholar
  62. Raymond, J. G. (2004). Prostitution on demand: Legalizing the buyers as sexual consumers. Violence Against Women, 10(10), 1156–1186.Google Scholar
  63. Roby, J., & Bergquist, K. (2014). Editorial. International Social Work, 57(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
  64. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  65. Sammut, G., Clark, M., & Kissaun, G. D. (2014). Dialogue, linguistic hinges and semantic barriers: Social psychological uses and functions of a vulgar term. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(3), 326–346.Google Scholar
  66. Sidun, N. M. (2009). Modern day slavery: The hidden and unspoken horror for girls and women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(4), 496–498.Google Scholar
  67. Sigmon, J. N. (2008). Combating modern-day slavery: Issues in identifying and assisting victims of human trafficking worldwide. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice, 3(2–3), 245–257.Google Scholar
  68. Suchland, J. (2013). Double framing in Lilya 4-ever: Sex trafficking and postsocialist abjection. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(3), 362–376.Google Scholar
  69. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.Google Scholar
  70. Tyldum, G., & Brunovskis, A. (2005). Describing the unobserved: Methodological challenges in empirical studies on human trafficking. International Migration, 43(1–2), 17–34.Google Scholar
  71. UNODC. (2012). Global report on trafficking in persons. United Nations publication.Google Scholar
  72. UNODC. (2016). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons 2016. United Nations publication, Sales No. E.16.IV.6.Google Scholar
  73. Valsiner, J. (2012). The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Vijeyarasa, R. (2013). Stigma, stereotypes and Brazilian soap operas: Road-blocks to ending human trafficking in Vietnam, Ghana and Ukraine. Gender, Place & Culture 20(8), 1015–1032.Google Scholar
  75. Wagner, W. (2012). Social representation theory. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of peace psychology. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  76. Wagner, W., & Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense–the theory of social representations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  77. Zhang, S. (2007). Smuggling and trafficking in human beings: All roads lead to America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  78. Zimmerman, C., & Kiss, L. (2017). Human trafficking and exploitation: A global health concern. PLOS Medicine, 14(11), e1002437.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola UniversityLa MiradaUSA

Personalised recommendations