The Rich Legacy of Covin and Slevin (1989) and Lumpkin and Dess (1996): A Constructive Critical Analysis of Their Deep Impact on Entrepreneurial Orientation Research
We examine the legacy of two award-winning seminal papers—Covin and Slevin (Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75–87, 1989) and Lumpkin and Dess (Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135–172, 1996)—that played a significant role in introducing and shaping research on entrepreneurial orientation (EO). We start by summarizing the two papers and analyzing their impact on the field. We then conduct a constructive critical assessment of current EO research by discussing three prevailing myths in the literature and discuss how revisiting the two seminal papers can help correct these myths relating to the theoretical exposition and measurement of EO. Our goal is to delve into the profound impact of the two seminal articles and identify gaps in current EO literature to offer directions for future research.
KeywordsEntrepreneurial orientation Gestalt EO Disaggregated EO EO myths EO dimensions EO configuration Additive EO model Multiplicative EO model Entrepreneurial proclivity Firm-level entrepreneurship
- Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2011). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
- Dutta, D. K., Gupta, V. K., & Chen, X. (2016). A tale of three strategic orientations: A moderated-mediation framework of the impact of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and learning orientation on firm performance. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 24(3), 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gupta, V. K., & Dutta, D. K. (2016). Inquiring into entrepreneurial orientation: Making progress, one step at a time. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 6–11.Google Scholar
- Gupta, V. K., Dutta, D. K., & Chen, X. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation capability and firm performance under conditions of organizational learning. Journal of Managerial Issues, 26(2), 157–173.Google Scholar
- Gupta, A., Chen, X., & Gupta, V. K. (2016a). Does management’s attention to different facets of entrepreneurial orientation create value for the firm?: A longitudinal study of large retailers. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 53–70.Google Scholar
- Gupta, V., Mortal, S. C., & Yang, T. (2016b). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm value: Does managerial discretion play a role? Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0210-3.
- Herrington, M., & Kew, P. (2017). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Global report. Babson: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.Google Scholar
- Kelley, D., Brush, C., Greene, P., Herrington, M., Ali, A., & Kew, P. (2015, October 17). Special report: Women’s entrepreneurship. Retrieved from www.gemconsortium.org/report/49281
- Khandwalla, P. N. (1976). Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7(4), 21–51.Google Scholar
- Lance, C. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2009). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in organizational and social research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McKenny, A. F., Aguinis, H., Short, J. C., & Anglin, A. H. (2016). What doesn’t get measured does exist: Improving the accuracy of computer-aided text analysis. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316657594.
- Richard, O. C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 255–266.Google Scholar
- Smart, D. T., & Conant, J. S. (1994). Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(3), 28–38.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, H. H. (1983). A perspective on entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School working paper 9-384-131.Google Scholar