Advertisement

Are Sharing Platforms Sustainable (Business Models)? A Consumer Survey on the Drivers of Using Sharing Platforms in the Travel Industry

  • Jorna Leenheer
  • Marco Kuijten
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Both growing consumer awareness regarding the effects of excessive consumption and the existence of worldwide internet platforms have contributed to the rise of the sharing economy. Internet platforms for consumer sharing and collaborative consumption are considered sustainable business models, because consumers make use of each other’s unused capacity reducing resources needed. In particular the sharing of accommodation through internet platforms is very popular, with Airbnb and Couchsurfing as the best known platforms. This chapter investigates whether sharing platforms in the travel industry can be considered sustainable (business models) and how they impact hotels that have always offered stable supply to travelers. By means of a representative survey among 2591 Dutch consumers, the key stakeholders of the platforms, we investigate the use, perceived value and market position of both sharing platforms and hotels. Our research shows that the platforms are well-known, 8.8% of Dutch consumers have used them and this number will approximately double in the next three years. Current users are typically are between 25 and 34 years, and either high- or low-educated but not so much medium-level educated (professional education). Social value and not so much economic value is the main driver for travelers to choose for a sharing alternative, perceived sustainable considerations play a minor role. Furthermore, given the price attractiveness of sharing platforms they may increase travel consumption, making sharing platforms unsustainable from an ecological point of view. The competiveness of sharing platforms puts downward pressure on the market for overnight stays. However, given that consumers’ preferences for sharing alternatives are not mainly financially driven, hotels better innovate in their business models to guarantee continuance, rather than to compete on price. Possible innovations can be found in partnerships with local business, local communities, and even Airbnb landlords. In sum, sharing platforms create more value than economic value only, but at the same time the supposed positive environmental impact is somewhat controversial. More research is needed on the exact considerations for choosing for sharing alternatives versus hotels at specific trips since many travelers are currently using both alternatives next to each other. Replication of the research in other countries is useful as well to draw more far-reach conclusions on this timely topic.

References

  1. Abdelkafi, N., Makhotin, S., & Patzelt, T. (2013). Business model innovations for electric mobility: What can be learned from existing business model patterns? International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 1340003.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613400033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albinsson, P., & Perera, B. Y. (2012). Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belk, R. (2007). Why not rather share than own? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010a). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  10. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010b). Beyond Zipcar: Collaborative consumption. Harvard Business Review, 88(10), 30.Google Scholar
  11. Botsman, R. (2014). Sharing’s not just for start-ups. Harvard Business Review, 92(3), 23–26.Google Scholar
  12. Botsman, R. (2016). The state of the sharing economy. RSA Journal, 2.Google Scholar
  13. Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Business Insider. (2017). 14 miljoen boekingen via Airbnb goed voor bijna 800 miljoen aan uitgaven in Nederland. Acessed from https://www.businessinsider.nl/14-miljoen-boekingen-via-airbnb-goed-voor-bijna-800-miljoen-aan-uitgaven-in-nederland/
  15. DaSilva, C., & Trkman, P. (2014). Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Planning, 47, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demailly, D., & Nove, A. (2014). The sharing economy: Make it sustainable. Accessed from http://www.iddri.org/Evenements/Interventions/ST0314_DD%20ASN_sharing%20economy.pdf
  17. Eckhardt, G., Belk, R., & Devinney, T. (2010). Why don’t consumers consume ethically? Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9(6), 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghaziani, A., & Ventresca, M. (2005). Keywords and cultural change: Frame analysis of business model public talk 1975-2000. Sociological Forum, 20, 523–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, J., Daneke, G., & Lenox, M. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepeneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heinrichs, H. (2013). Sharing economy: A potential new pathway to sustainability. Gaia, 22, 228–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ING Bureau for Economics. (2015). Ruim half miljoen huishoudens doen mee aan de deeleconomie. Accessed from https://www.ing.nl/media/Deeleconomie%20in%20kaart_tcm162-87219.pdf
  23. Jonker, J. (2014). Nieuwe business modellen. Amsterdam: Academic Service.Google Scholar
  24. Jolink, N., & Niesten, E. (2015). Sustainable development and business models of entrepeneurs in the organic food industry. Business Strategy and Environment, 24, 386–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamberton, C., & Rose, R. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leenheer, J., & Scherpenzeel, A. (2013). Does it pay off to include non-Internet households in an Internet panel? International Journal of Internet Science, 8(1), 17–29.Google Scholar
  27. Mahmoud, A. (2016). The impact of Airbnb on hotel and hospitality industry. Accessed from http://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/4074708.html
  28. Marketline. (2016). MarketLine industry profile: Hotels and motels in the Netherlands. Reference code 0176-0520. Marketline.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, C. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mendelson, H. (2000). Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46, 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 14, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NRC. (2016). Why Airbnb and hotels can coexist. Accessed from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/02/22/waarom-airbnb-en-hotels-best-goed-samen-gaan-a1493665
  33. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Science (CIAS), 16, 1–25.Google Scholar
  34. Pralahad, C. K., & Hart, S. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Accessed from https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/ict4b/Fortune-BoP.pdf
  35. Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. (2017). Going one’s way: Drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sacks, D. (2011). The sharing economy. Accessed from https://www.fastcompany.com/1747551/sharing-economy
  37. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Statistics Netherlands. (2017). Kwart van de hotels ervaart concurrentie van sites als Airbnb. Accessed from https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2017/28/kwart-hotels-ervaart-concurrentie-van-sites-als-airbnb
  39. Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Verboven, H., & Venherck, L. (2016). The sustainability paradox of the sharing economy. Umwelt Wirtshafts Forum, 24(4), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. (2016). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Accessed from http://people.bu.edu/zg/publications/airbnb.pdf
  42. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Avans University of Applied Sciences‘s-HertogenboschThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations