Mobile Learning: Challenging the Current Educational Model of Communication Studies

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 721)

Abstract

Mobile learning or M-learning, regarded as a specific field of electronic learning, is considered to stem from the affordances of computer-mediated communication. In this way, it fosters connection and interaction “on the move”. M-learning benefits from the ubiquity of information and communication technologies (ICTs), consequently it is not bounded in space and time. However, its study goes beyond a techno-deterministic understanding of its performance. Studies on M-learning refer less to the functionality of appliances and the development of mobile applications than address the subjective perception of how this special type of educational venue leads to the acquisition of meaningful and effective learning. This study focuses on Communication Studies in higher education in Ecuador that deal with the paradox of studying the media through the media, which results in studying theories and practice of communication by using these same tools. This meta-communication dilemma becomes conflicting when confronted to the still current face-to-face jotting and listening educational model that keeps being backed by strong numbers of faculty members. By unfolding the varied affordances of M-learning, the outcomes of this study suggest that blending formal education with informal learning could lead to encouraging, accessible and cooperative meaning-making on the move.

Keywords

Mobile learning M-learning Communication studies ICTs 

References

  1. Ally, M., Prieto-Blásquez, J.: What is the future of mobile learning in education? RUSC: Univ. Knowl. Soc. J. 11, 142–151 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i1.2033Google Scholar
  2. Almaiah, M.A., Jalil, M.M.A., Man, M.: Empirical investigation to explore factors that achieve high quality of mobile learning system based on students’ perspectives. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 19(3), 1314–1320 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castells, M.: Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M.: Communication Power. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  5. Cavus, N., Uzunboylu, H.: Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 1(1), 434–438 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dohn, N.B.: Web 2.0: inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 4(3), 343–363 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9066-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dohn, N.B., Thorsen, M., Larsen, S.: E-learning. In: Dolin, J., Ingerslev, G.H., Jørgensen, P.S., Rienecker, L. (eds.) University Teaching and Learning, pp. 299–326. Samfundslitteratur, Copenhaguen (2015)Google Scholar
  8. Duguid, F., Mündel, K., Schugurensky, D.: Volunteer Work, Informal Learning and Social Action. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FACSO: Plan Director de Carrera. F. d. C. Social, p. 20. Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Ferdousi, B., Bari, J.: Infusing mobile technology into undergraduate courses for effective learning. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176(Supplement C), 307–311 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Figueroa, R.: Introducción a las Teorías de la Comunicación. Pearson, Mexico (2013)Google Scholar
  12. Foley, G., Gonczi, A., Stromquist, N.P., et al.: Dimensions of Adult Learning: Adult Education and Training in a Global Era. McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd., Maidenhead (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Jarvis, J.: Public parts: how sharing in the digital age improves the way we work and live. Simon & Schuster, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  14. Locher, M.A.: Electronic discourse. In: Schneider, K.P., Barron, A. (eds.) Pragmatics of Discourse, pp. 555–582. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/Boston (2014)Google Scholar
  15. Mansell, R.: Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation, and Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  16. Martin-Barbero, J.: Thinking communication in Latin America. In: Christians, C., Nordenstreng, K. (eds.) Communication Theories in a Multicultural World, pp. 46–59. Peter Lang, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  17. Martín-Barbero, J.: De los medios a las mediaciones. Convenio Andrés Bello, Bogota (2003)Google Scholar
  18. Mills, L.A., Knezek, G., Khaddage, F.: Information seeking, information sharing, and going mobile: three bridges to informal learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32(Supplement C), 324–334 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Int. J. Digit. Econ. 65, 17–37 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. Perales, M., Barrero, F., Arahal, M.R., Toral, S.: Problem based learning case in a control undergraduate subject. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(29), 182–187 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peters, J.D.: Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000)Google Scholar
  22. Prensky, M.: From digital natives to digital wisdom: hopeful essays for 21st century learning. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2012). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387765
  23. Shirky, C.: Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Penguin Books, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  24. Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., Tomic, A.: Computer Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. Sage, London (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations