Advertisement

Contemporary Strategies for Teaching Internal Anatomy of Teeth

  • Bettina BasraniEmail author
  • Marco A. Versiani
Chapter

Abstract

The importance of preclinical training in endodontics has been well established in the literature for endodontic education. Its primary purpose is to introduce students to cognitive and psychomotor skills related to the morphology and spatial and functional relationships of human dentition. The aim of this chapter is to describe different models to teach the internal anatomy of the teeth in distinct levels of the education curriculum in endodontics.

Keywords

Anatomy Education Micro-CT Prototype Root canal Video-assisted teaching 

References

  1. 1.
    Obrez A, Briggs C, Buckman J, Goldstein L, Lamb C, Knight WG. Teaching clinically relevant dental anatomy in the dental curriculum: description and assessment of an innovative module. J Dent Educ. 2011;75:797–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luz DS, de SOF SRK, Vier-Pelisser FV, Morgental RD, Waltrick SB, et al. Preparation time and perceptions of Brazilian specialists and dental students regarding simulated root canals for endodontic teaching: a preliminary study. J Dent Educ. 2015;79:56–63.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nassri MR, Carlik J, da Silva CR, Okagawa RE, Lin S. Critical analysis of artificial teeth for endodontic teaching. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hines D. The application of anatomy and other basic medical sciences in general practice. Br J Med Educ. 1970;4:145–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchanan LS. Everything’s changed except the anatomy! Dent Today. 2012;31:100, 102, 104, 105.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eaton KA, Reynolds PA, Grayden SK, Wilson NH. A vision of dental education in the third millennium. Br Dent J. 2008;205:261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kato A, Ziegler A, Utsumi M, Ohno K, Takeichi T. Three-dimensional imaging of internal tooth structures: applications in dental education. J Oral Biosci. 2016;58:100–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolgin M, Wiedemann P, Frank W, Wrbas KT, Kielbassa AM. Development and evaluation of an endodontic simulation model for dental students. J Dent Educ. 2015;79:1363–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LaTurno SA, Corcoran JF, Ellison RL. An evaluation of a teaching aid in endodontics. J Endod. 1984;10:507–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guttmann GD, Ma TP, MacPherson BR. Making gross anatomy relevant to dental students. J Dent Educ. 2003;67:355–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peterson WR. A technique for preparing an artificial tooth for endodontic access preparation. J Endod. 1980;6:490–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Testarelli L, D’Ambrosio F, Pecci R, et al. Present and future in the use of micro-CT scanner 3D analysis for the study of dental and root canal morphology. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2012;48:26–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lyroudia K, Mikrogeorgis G, Bakaloudi P, Kechagias E, Nikolaidis N, Pitas I. Virtual endodontics: three-dimensional tooth volume representations and their pulp cavity access. J Endod. 2002;28:599–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pao YC, Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, Taylor DT. Computer-graphics aided instruction of three-dimensional dental anatomy. J Dent Educ. 1984;48:315–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. North American dental students’ perspectives about their clinical education. J Dent Educ. 2006;70:361–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wallen ES, Schulein TM, Johnson LA. A computer program to aid in visual concept development in dentistry. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1997;52:105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gutmann JL, Rigsby S. Meeting age old challenges in root canal procedures with contemporary technological assessments. ENDO (Lond Engl). 2015;9:107–10.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marker DR, Juluru K, Long C, Magid D. Strategic improvements for gross anatomy web-based teaching. Anat Res Int. 2012;2012:146262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kato A, Ohno N. Construction of three-dimensional tooth model by micro-computed tomography and application for data sharing. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13:43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naseri M, Shantiaee Y, Rasekhi J, Zadsirjan S, Mojtahed Bidabadi M, Khayat A. Efficacy of video-assisted instruction on knowledge and performance of dental students in access cavity preparation. Iran Endod J. 2016;11:329–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rystedt H, Reit C, Johansson E, Lindwall O. Seeing through the dentist’s eyes: video-based clinical demonstrations in preclinical dental training. J Dent Educ. 2013;77:1629–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramlogan S, Raman V, Sweet J. A comparison of two forms of teaching instruction: video vs. live lecture for education in clinical periodontology. Eur J Dent Educ. 2014;18:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ziegler A, Ogurreck M, Steinke T, Beckmann F, Prohaska S, Ziegler A. Opportunities and challenges for digital morphology. Biol Direct. 2010;5:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Okeson J, Buckman J. Curricular guidelines for teaching dental anatomy. J Dent Educ. 1993;57:382–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Endodontic Program, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão PretoUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations