Basic Radiation Protection Related to the Assessment of Remediation Measures in Radioactively Contaminated Areas

  • Jozef Sabol


Various peaceful applications of radioactive sources, the operation of nuclear facilities, radioactive waste management and accidents involving radioactive material as well as nuclear weapons testing (up to the 1960s) have resulted in some radioactive contamination of vast areas in different parts of the world. There is also a certain small contribution to this contamination from past practices, when no strict requirements had been introduced. Some of the affected areas, where the population may be exposed to higher levels close or even exceeding the present regulatory requirements or where the environment has been radioactively contaminated in excess of the introduced activity concentrations above the level considered now as being unjustifiable, require appropriate remediation actions in order to reduce the exposure and radioactive contamination levels in line with the relevant current national and international standards. In order to implement these standards and any other relevant requirements for assessing the impact of radioactively contaminated sites, the exposure of persons and the radioactive contamination of affected areas has to be quantified based on a sound generally accepted system of quantities and units. This is why the introduction of such a system is of primary importance to ensure consistent and unambiguous understanding and interpretation of the monitoring results expressed in well-defined quantities. The same approach should also be applied in recommending appropriate limits or reference levels ensuring the adequate radiation protection of people and the environment.


Radioactive waste management Radiation exposure Radioactive contamination Radiation quantities Radiation units Radiation protection Dose limits Reference levels 


  1. Amano Y (2016) Decommissioning and remediation: enhancing safety of the public and the environment. IAEA Bull:1
  2. Balonov MI (2012) On protecting the inexperienced reader from Chernobyl myths. J Radiol Prot 32:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balonov MI (2013) The Chernobyl accident as a source of new radiological knowledge: implications for Fukushima rehabilitation and research programmes. J Radiol Prot 33:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. IAEA (2007) Remediation process for areas affected by past activities and accidents. IAEA safety standards series no. WS-G-3.1. IAEA, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  5. IAEA (2009) The international nuclear and radiological event scale user’s manual. IAEA, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  6. IAEA (2016) Advancing implementation of decommissioning and environmental remediation programmes. IAEA nuclear energy series no. NW-T-1.10Google Scholar
  7. ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 1003. Annual report ICRP 37:(2–4)Google Scholar
  8. ICRU (2011) Fundamental quantities and units for ionizing radiation (Revised). ICRU report no. 85. J ICRU 11:1Google Scholar
  9. Martin JE (2000) Physics for radiation protection. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin A, Harbison S, Beach K, Cole P (2012) An introduction to radiation protection. Hodder Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. NCRP (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP report no. 160. NCRP, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  12. Sabol J, Weng PS (1995) Introduction to radiation protection dosimetry. Scientific World Publisher, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thielen H (2012) The Fukushima Daichi nuclear accident – an overview. Health Phys 103:169–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. UNSCEAR (2011) Report of the United Nations Committee on the effects of atomic radiation sources and effects of ionizing radiation (UNSCEAR) 2010. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Voigt G, Fesenko S (2009) Remediation of contaminated environments. Elsevier Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jozef Sabol
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crisis ManagementPACRPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations