Introducing International Practice Theory
International relations scholars are increasingly interested in practice. Following a wider turn to practices in the social sciences, a broad movement of scholars is now engaged in practice-based study. In this introduction, we discuss what intrigues us about practice. International practice theory offers a genuine and novel perspective on politics and international relations, and promises to provide observers with a new lens through which to analyse the world. We show that four issue areas – the study of diplomacy, the production of insecurity, transnational governance, and state building and intervention – have been particularly important in developing the empirical research agenda of international practice theory. We also provide a brief overview of the seven core approaches discussed in the book. These approaches, ranging from Bourdieu’s praxeology to Boltanski’s pragmatic sociology, are the conceptual cornerstones of international practice theory. Finally, we introduce the notion of praxiography as the corresponding methodology for the study of international practices.
KeywordsPractice turn Practice theory International relations theory Culture
- Acuto, Michele, and Simon Curtis, eds. 2013. Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Adler, Emanuel. 2005. Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundation of International Relations. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Balzaq, Thiery, Tugba Basaran, Didier Bgio, Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet, and Christian Olson. 2010. Security Practices. In International Studies Encyclopedia Online, ed. Robert A. Denemark. Blackwell Publishing. http://www.isacompendium.com/. Accessed 16 Oct 2017.
- ———. 2005. Globalized In-Security: The Field and the Ban-Opticon. In Translation, Philosophy and the Colonial Difference: A Multilingual Series of Cultural Theory, ed. Naoki Sakai and Jon Solomon, 109–157. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
- Buckley-Zistel, Susanne. 2014. Narrative Truths. On the Construction of the Past in Truth Commissions. In Transitional Justice Theories, ed. Susanne Buckley-Zistel, Teresa Koloma Beck, Christian Braun, and Corinna Mieth, 144–162. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bueger, Christian. 2011. The Clash of Practice: Political Controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission. Evidence and Policy 7 (2), Special Issue on the Practice of Policymaking: 171–191.Google Scholar
- ———. 2016. Security as Practice. In Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, ed. Thierry Balzacq and Myriam Dunn Cavelty, 2nd ed., 126–135. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Davis, Kevin, Angelina Fisher, Benedict Kingsbury, and Sally Engle Merry, eds. 2012b. Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Huysmans, Jef. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Koddenbrock, Kai. 2016. The Practice of Humanitarian Intervention. Aid Workers, Agencies and Institutions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Niemann, Holger. 2015. Justification and Critique in the UN Security Council: The Veto as Legitimacy Test. Presented at the ISA Conference, New Orleans, February 18–21.Google Scholar
- Sending, Ole Jacob, Vincent Pouliot, and Iver B. Neumann, eds. 2015. Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, Michael C. 2007. Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security: The Reconstruction of Security in the Post-Cold War Era. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar