Advertisement

Scales of Design: Ecodesign and the Anthropocene

  • Victor Petit
  • Bertrand Guillaume
Chapter
Part of the Design Research Foundations book series (DERF)

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide with a brief historical overview of the encounter between design and the global environment in the Anthropocene, investigating the moment when the traditional figures of conception (namely the engineer and the architect) merged under the single term “design”. We then offer a philosophical inquiry into the meaning of design today, and the crucial role of designers next to engineers. We more particularly look at the issue of scales (space scale and time scale) in the context of the ecological crisis, and at the significance and the usefulness of an approach in terms of the “milieu” rather than of the environment. We show that the articulation of global and local is possible, as is possible a transition both digital and ecological, and that the important distinction is not between global and local design, but between two ideas of eco-design.

Keywords

Anthropocene Ecodesign Milieu Scale 

References

  1. Aalto, A. (2012). La table blanche et autres textes. Marseille: Parenthèses. [1st Ed. 1997].Google Scholar
  2. Allenby, B. R. (1998). Earth systems engineering: The role of industrial ecology in an engineered world. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(3), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allenby, B. (2005). Reconstructing earth: Technology and environment in the age of humans. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anders, G. (1961). Commandment in the atomic age. In Burning Conscience: The Case of the Hiroshima Pilot Claude Eatherly, told in his Letters to Gunter Anders. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  5. Anker, P. (2010). From Bauhaus to Ecohouse: A history of ecological design. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anker, P., Harpman, L., & Joachim, M. (2014). Global design: Elsewhere envisioned. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
  7. Baudrillard, J. (1972). Design et environnement ou l’escalade de l’économie politique In Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe (pp. 229–255). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  8. Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  9. Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2013). L’événement Anthropocène. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  10. Boudon, Ph. (Dir.). (1991). De l’architecture à l’épistémologie. La question de l’échelle, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  11. Boudon, P. (2002). Échelle(s). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  12. Colomina, B. (2001). Enclosed by images: The Eameses’ multiscreen architecture. GreyRoom, 2, 6–29.Google Scholar
  13. Corbusier, L. (1949). Le Modulor, essai sur une mesure harmonique à l'échelle humaine applicable universellement à l'Architecture et à la mécanique. Boulogne: Éditions de l'Architecture d'Aujourd'hui.Google Scholar
  14. De Jarcy, X. (2015). Le Corbusier, un fascisme français. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  15. Deyong, S. (2002). The rise and fall of the Megastructure: Memories of the urban future. In T. Riley (dir.), The changing of the Avant-Garde: Visionary architectural drawings from the Howard Gilman collection (pp. 23–36). New York: MoMA.Google Scholar
  16. Diederichsen, D., & Franke, A. (Eds.). (2013). The whole earth California and the disappearance of the outside. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, P. (1996). The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Hütler, W. (1999). Society’s metabolism. The intellectual history of material flow analysis. Part II.1970-1988. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, E. (2007). Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuller, R. B. (1964). Education automation. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fuller, R. B. (1969). Operating manual for spaceship earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fuller, R. B. (1973). Earth, Inc. Garden City: Anchor.Google Scholar
  24. Gabel, M. (1974). Energy, earth and everyone: Energy strategies for spaceship earth, with the world game laboratory. New York: Doubleday. (1980).Google Scholar
  25. Gabel, M. (2010). Designing a world that works for all. http://designsciencelab.com/resources/dsl_full%20book.pdf
  26. Galison, P. (1992). Big science: The growth of large scale research. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 217–239Google Scholar
  28. Gorz, A. (1975). Ecologie et politique. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  29. Gorz, A. (2008). Ecologica. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  30. Gough, M. (2009). Backyard landing: Three structures by Buckminster fuller at the Museum of Modern art, 1959. In H.-Y. Chu & R. G. Trujillo (Eds.), New Views on R. Buckminster Fuller (pp. 124–145). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Grevsmühl, S. (2014). La Terre vue d’en haut: l’invention de l’environnement global. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  32. Hilty, L. M., & Aebischer, B. (Eds.). (2015). ICT innovations for sustainability. International Publishing Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Höhler, S. (2014). Spaceship earth in the environmental age, 1960–1990. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Hood, R. (1929). A city under a single roof. Nation’s Business, 17(12), 19–29.Google Scholar
  35. Hopkins, R. (2008). The transition handbook: From oil dependency to local resilience (p. 2008). Chelsea: Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Hopkins, R. (2013). The power of just doing stuff: How local action can change the world. Totnes: Green Books.Google Scholar
  37. Ingold, T. (1993). Globes and spheres: The topology of environmentalism. In K. Milton (Ed.), Environmentalism: The view from anthropology (pp. 29–40). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Jankovic, N. (2012a). World game versus Club de Rome? 1972-2012. In E3 – Energy, Earth and Everyone. Une stratégie énergétique globale pour le vaisseau spatial Terre? World Game, 1969-1977 (pp. 101–123). Paris: Éditions B2.Google Scholar
  39. Jankovic, N. (2012b). Revolution by global design: croire en la croissance ? In E3 – Energy, Earth and Everyone. Une stratégie énergétique globale pour le vaisseau spatial Terre? World Game, 1969-1977 (pp. 7–31). Paris: Éditions B2.Google Scholar
  40. Keitsch, M. (2012). Sustainable design: A brief appraisal of its main concepts. Sustainable Development, 20, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Khor, L. (2001). The Breakdown of Nations (1957). Foxhole/Dartington/Totnes: Green Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kirk, A. (2001). Appropriating technology. The whole earth catalog and counterculture environmental politics. Environmental History, 6(3), 374–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirk, A. (2007). Counterculture green. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  44. Koolhaas, R. (2002). Junkspace. October, 100, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koolhaas, R., & Mau, B. (1997). S,M,L,XL. New York: Monacceli Press.Google Scholar
  46. Krausse, J., & Lichtenstein, C. (Eds.). (1999). Your private sky: Richard Buckminster fuller, the art of design science. Baden: Lars Müller.Google Scholar
  47. Latour, B. (1993). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed (pp. 141–170). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Latour, B. (1994). Une sociologie sans objet. Note théorique sur l’interobjectivité. Sociologie du travail, 36(4), 587–607.Google Scholar
  49. Latour, B. (2005). En tapotant sur Rem Koolhaas avec un bâton d’aveugle. Architecture d’aujourd’hui, 361, 70–79.Google Scholar
  50. Latour, B. (2008). A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design (with Special Attention to Peter Sloterdijk). In F. Hackne, J. Glynne and V. Minto (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society (pp. 2–10). Falmouth: 3–6 September 2009, e-books, Universal Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Le Corbusier (Charles-Edouard Jeanneret). (1964). The radiant City: Elements of a doctrine of urbanism to be used as the basis of our machine-age civilization (P. Knight, Trans.). New York: Orion Press. The original French edition is La ville radieuse: Eléments d’une doctrine d’urbanisme pour l’équipement de la civilisation machiniste (Boulogne: Editions de l’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, 1933).Google Scholar
  52. Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Madge, P. (1997). Ecological design: a new critique. Design Issues, 13(2), 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maldonado, T. (1972). Design, nature, and revolution: Toward a critical ecology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  55. Manzini, E. (2007). Design research for sustainable social innovation. In R. Michel (Ed.), Design research now. Essays and selected projects (pp. 233–245). Birkhäuser: Basel/Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Margolin, V. (1998). Design for a sustainable world. Design Issues, 14(2), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Margolin, V. (2002). The politics of the artificial. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  58. Massey, J. (2009). The sumptuary ecology of Buckminster Fuller's designs. In A. Braddock & C. Irmscher (Eds.), A keener perception, Ecocritical studies in American art history (pp. 218–236). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  59. McLuhan, M. (2005 [1966]). The Emperor's Old Clothes. In G. Kepes (Ed.), The Man-Made Object (pp. 90–95). New York: George Brazillier Inc. Reprinted in E. McLuhan and W. T. Gordon (Eds.), Marshall McLuhan Unbound (20). Corte Madera (California): Gingko Press.Google Scholar
  60. McLuhan, M. (2005 [1971]). Roles, masks and performances. New Literary History, 2(3), 517-531.. Reprinted in E. McLuhan and W. T. Gordon (Eds.), Marshall McLuhan Unbound (12). Corte Madera (California): Gingko Press.Google Scholar
  61. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens_III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  62. Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  63. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ostrom, E. (2009). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Background paper to the 2010 World Development Report.Google Scholar
  65. Otto, F. (1954). Das hängende Dach. Berlin: Bauwelt Verlag.Google Scholar
  66. Pang, A. S.-K. (1997). Dome days: Buckminster fuller in the cold war. In F. Spufford & J. Uglow (Eds.), Cultural Babbage: Technology, time and invention (pp. 167–192). Boston and London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  67. Papanek, V. (1995). The green imperative: Natural Design for the Real World. New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  68. Papanek, V. (2011). Design for the Real World: Human ecology and social change. New York: Thames and Hudson, Second Edition Completly Revised.Google Scholar
  69. Parent, C. (1971). Face à face: Architecture et Design. L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, 155, 19–23.Google Scholar
  70. Patrix, G. (1962). Entretien avec Georges Patrix. Les cahiers de la publicité, 4-4, 87–102.Google Scholar
  71. Patrix, G. (1973). Design et environnement. Paris: Casterman.Google Scholar
  72. Petit, V. (2015). L’éco-design: design de l’environnement ou design du milieu? In Sciences du Design, 2 (pp. 31–39). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  73. Picon, A. (2008). Fuller’s avatars: A view from the present. In M. Hays, D. Miller (Dir.), Buckminster Fuller: Starting with the Universe (pp. 46-59). New York: Whitney Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  74. Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  75. Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society. In The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan Trade.Google Scholar
  76. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1969). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. In Policy Sciences 4 (pp. 155–173). Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  77. Schor, J. B. (2013). From fast fashion to connected consumption: Slowing down the spending treadmill. In N. Osbaldiston (Ed.), Culture of the slow: Social deceleration in an accelerated world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  78. Schwarz, A., Nordmann, A. (2011). The political economy of Technoscience. In M. Carrier, A. Nordmann (dir.), Science in the Context of Application, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 317–336.Google Scholar
  79. Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Scott, F. (2007). Architecture or techno-utopia. Politics after modernism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  81. Simondon, G. (2014). Sur la technique (1953–1983). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  82. Sloterdijk, P. (2008). The crystal palace. Publica, 37.Google Scholar
  83. Sloterdijk, P. (2011). Neither Sun nor Death. New-York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  84. Spangenberg, J. H., Fuad-Luke, A., & Blincoe, K. (2010). Design for Sustainability (DfS): The interface of sustainable production and consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(15), 1485–1493Google Scholar
  85. Stahel, W. (2010). The performance economy.London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  86. Thorpe, A. (2012). Architecture & Design Versus Consumerism: How design activism confronts growth. London/New York Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Todd, N. J., & Todd, J. (1994). From eco-cities to living machines. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  88. Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Turner, F. (2009). Buckminster fuller: A technocrat for the Conterculture. In H.-Y. Chu, R. Trujillo (dir.), New view on R. Buckminster fuller (pp. 146–159). Standford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Viénot, J. (1948). Du barrage au stylo. Art Présent. Beautés de la technique, (pp. 7–8, 9–11 and109–111).Google Scholar
  91. Webster, K. (2015). The circular economy: A wealth of flows.Google Scholar
  92. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  93. Youngblood, G. (1970). World Game. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Zung, T. T. K. (2001). Buckminster fuller: Anthology for the new Millenium. New York: St. Marin’s Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TechnologyTroyesFrance
  2. 2.Max-Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations