Advertisement

Conceptualizing Aesthetics in Design: A Phenomenological Framework

  • Mads Nygaard Folkmann
Chapter
Part of the Design Research Foundations book series (DERF)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to introduce and discuss aesthetics as an approach to understand how design frames experience. In doing so, the chapter combines two philosophical interests in design, design phenomenology and design aesthetics, in order to promote a framework for discussing the impact of aesthetic meaning construction on experience. First, the chapter raises the phenomenological question of the relationship between design and experience, specifically, how design conditions experience. Second, in looking at aesthetics in terms of (a) the sensual appeal of design, (b) design objects as aesthetic media that frame modes of understanding, and (c) contextual factors, such as media, influencing what is regarded as aesthetic, it is the thesis of the chapter that a reflective concept of design aesthetics can be employed to differentiate between three different ways in which design frame our experience: We can look at sensual, conceptual, and contextual aesthetic dimensions of design and examine their contribution to the framing of experience, that is, how different dimensions of meaning articulation in design offer different framings of the experiences promoted by design objects and solutions. Further, the concept of aestheticization is introduced and discussed as the way in which objects are construed as ‘aesthetic’. A central insight is that the contextual aspect of aestheticization can promote a cultural construction of new conditions and new categories for the way we experience relevant meaning properties of design objects.

Keywords

Design phenomenology Aesthetics Aestheticization Aesthetic categories 

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. (1970). Ästhetische Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  2. B&O. (2012). Little Red Riding Hood - BeoLit 12 Commercial. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DURcvvn2PgI. Accessed 28 Nov 2015.
  3. B&O (2015). Beolit .12. http://www.beoplay.com/products/beolit12. Accessed 28 Nov 2015.
  4. Bhatt, R. (2013). Rethinking aesthetics. The role of body in design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Böhme, G. (2001). Aisthetik. Vorlesungen über Ästhetik als allgemeine Wahrnehmungslehre. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Böhme, G. (2013). Atmosphäre. Essays zur neuen Ästhetik. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. Boradkar, P. (2010). Designing things: A critical introduction to the culture of objects. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  8. Bredies, K. (2014). Gebrauch als design. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bubner, R. (1989). Ästhetische Erfahrung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  10. Dant, T. (1999). Material Culture in the Social World. Birmingham: OUP.Google Scholar
  11. Dant, T. (2008). The ‘pragmatics’ of material interaction. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desmet, P.M.A. (2010). Three levels of product emotion. Proceedings of KEER 2010, International Conference on Kansei Engeneering and Emotion Research, Paris, March 2–4.Google Scholar
  13. Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57–66.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. du Gay, P., et al. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything. Design, fiction, and social dreaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer culture and postmodernism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Folkmann, M. N. (2013). The aesthetics of imagination in design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Folkmann, M. N. (2016). Designkultur. Teoretiske perspektiver på design. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  20. Forsey, J. (2013). The aesthetics of design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Genette, G. (1999). The Aesthetic Relation. Ithaca. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gumbrecht, H. U. (2003). Epiphanien. In J. Küpper & C. Menke (Eds.), Dimensionen ästhetischer Erfahrung (pp. 203–222). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  23. Hebdige, D. (1994). Object as image: The Italian scooter cycle. In Hiding in the light (pp. 77–115). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48, 157–172.Google Scholar
  25. Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product aesthetics. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product Experience (pp. 259–285). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Jordan, P. (2000). Designing pleasurable products. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Julier, G. (2014). The culture of design. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Lash, S., & Lury, C. (2007). Global culture industry: The mediation of things. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Leddy, T. (2012). The extraordinary in the ordinary. The aesthetics of everyday life. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lury, C. (1996). Consumer Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Menke, C. (1991). Die Souveränität der Kunst. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  33. Menke, C. (2013). Die Kraft der Kunst. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  34. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénonénologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  35. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, D. (2010). Stuff. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ngai, S. (2012). Our aesthetic categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  38. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Oldemeyer, E. (2008). Alltagsästhetisierung: Vom Wandel ästhetischer Erfahrung. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  40. Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  41. Riisberg, V., & Bang, A. L. (2014). Design practice and aesthetics. Wassard Elea Rivista, 2(2), 55–68.Google Scholar
  42. Saito, Y. (2010). Everyday aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schaeffer, J.-M. (2015). L’expérience esthétique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  44. Seel, M. (2000). Ästhetik des Erscheinens. München. Hanser.Google Scholar
  45. Seel, M. (2007). Die Macht der Erscheinung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. Selle, G. (2007). Design im Alltag. Vom Thonetstuhl zum Mikrochip. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  47. Shusterman, R. (2000). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  48. Stockmarr, P. (2014). Det æstetiske i design. [PhD thesis]. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation.Google Scholar
  49. UMA. (2015). http://www.project-uma.com/. Accessed 28 Nov 2015.
  50. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Vial, S. (2013). L’être et l’écran. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  52. Vial, S. (2014). Court traité du design. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  53. Welsch, W. (1990). Ästhetisches Denken. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Design and CommunicationUniversity of Southern DenmarkKoldingDenmark

Personalised recommendations