Uncovering the Relationships Between Phone Communication Activities and Spatiotemporal Distribution of Mobile Phone Users
In recent years, call detail records (CDRs) have been widely used to study various aspects of urban and human dynamics. One assumption implicitly made in many existing studies is that people’s phone communication activities could represent spatiotemporal distribution of the population, or at least of the mobile phone users. By using a mobile phone data set which consists of CDRs plus other cellphone-related logs (e.g., cellular handover and periodic location update), we derive two cellphone usage indicators (volume of calls/messages [\(V\)] and number of active phone users [\(N\)]) as well as the spatiotemporal distribution of mobile phone users, and evaluate their relationships through correlation and regression analysis. We find that the correlations between the number of mobile phone users and each of the two cellphone usage indicators remain high and stable during the day time and in early evening (i.e., 07:00–21:30). However, their relationships revealed by the regression models vary greatly throughout a day. Researchers therefore should be cautious when using mobile phone communication activities to quantify certain aspects of urban dynamics. Our regression analyses suggest that the log-transformation model performs better than the simple linear regression model (in predicting phone user distribution) when the independent variable (\(V\) or \(N\)) is fixed. Also, we find that \(N\) serves as a better independent variable than \(V\), which is affected more by individual “burst” of phone communication activities, when explaining spatiotemporal distribution of mobile phone users. A 3-fold cross validation suggests that CDRs can be used along with other data sources (e.g., land use) to deliver more robust estimation of phone user distributions, which potentially facilitate dynamic projection of urban population distributions.
KeywordsCall detail records Cellphone usage Space-time Population distribution Urban dynamics
This research was jointly supported by the Alvin and Sally Beaman Professorship and Arts and Sciences Excellence Professorship of the University of Tennessee, Natural Science Foundation of China (41231171, 41371377, 41501486, 91546106, 41571431), Key Program of the Chinese Academy of Science (ZDRW-ZS-2016-6-3), and Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Spatial Information Engineering (2014101).
- Balk, D., & Yetman, G. (2004). The global distribution of population: evaluating the gains in resolution refinement. New York: Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Barabási, A.-L. 2010. Bursts: the hidden patterns behind everything we do, from your e-mail to bloody crusades: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Birenboim, A., & Shoval, N. (2015). Mobility research in the age of the smartphone. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 283–291.Google Scholar
- Cho, E., Myers, S. A, & Leskovec, J. (2011). Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks. In Paper read at Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1082–1090). San Diego, CA: ACM.Google Scholar
- Dobson, J. E., Bright, E. A., Coleman, P. R., Durfee, R. C., & Worley, B. A. (2000). LandScan: a global population database for estimating populations at risk. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(7), 849–857.Google Scholar
- Girardin, F., Vaccari, A., Gerber, A., Biderman, A., & Ratti, C. (2009). Towards estimating the presence of visitors from the aggregate mobile phone network activity they generate. In International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management.Google Scholar
- Harvey, J. T. (2002b). Population estimation models based on individual TM pixels. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68(11), 1181–1192.Google Scholar
- International Telecommunication Union. (2014). World Telecommunication Development Conference (WTDC-2014): Final Report. (ITU, Dubai, United Arab Emirates).Google Scholar
- International Telecommunication Union. (2015). ICT facts and figures—the world in 2015. (http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2015.pdf last accessed on February 6, 2016).
- Isaacman, S., Becker, R., Cáceres, R., Martonosi, M., Rowland, J., Varshavsky, A., Willinger, W. (2012). Human mobility modeling at metropolitan scales. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 239–252). ACM.Google Scholar
- Shanghai Bureau of Statistics. 2014. 2014 年上海市国民经济和社会发展统计公报 [Shanghai Economic and Social Development Statistical Bulletin 2014]. http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/sjfb/201502/277392.html (last accessed 15 February 2016).
- Soto, V., & Frías-Martínez E. (2011). Automated land use identification using cell-phone records. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on MobiArch (pp. 17–22). ACM.Google Scholar
- Vieira, M. R., Frias-Martinez, V., Oliver, N & Frias-Martinez, E. (2010). Characterizing dense urban areas from mobile phone-call data: Discovery and social dynamics. In Paper read at Social Computing (SocialCom), 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on.Google Scholar
- Xu, Y., Shaw, S.-L., Zhao, Z., Yin, L., Lu, F., Chen, J., et al. (2016). Another tale of two cities: understanding human activity space using actively tracked cellphone location data. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 489–502.Google Scholar
- Zhao, Z., Shaw, S.-L., Xu, Y., Lu, F., Chen, J., & Yin, L. (2016). Understanding the bias of call detail records in human mobility research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(9), 1738–1762.Google Scholar