Advertisement

Why Do Birds Lay Eggs in Conspecifics’ Nests?

  • Bruce E. Lyon
  • John M. Eadie
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

Conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) resembles interspecific brood parasitism, except that parasitic females lay eggs in the nests of conspecifics. CBP is a female alternative reproductive behavior, and understanding its evolution requires a life history approach. We review studies that investigate life history aspects of CBP. One or more life history components have been examined for 56 species, 49 of which are relevant to the adaptive basis of CBP. Various approaches have been used to detect CBP, but there is increasing reliance on molecular methods. Molecular methods are not always foolproof, and false exclusions are incorrectly interpreted as CBP; future studies should employ multiple lines of evidence. Two types of parasites have been documented, often in the same species: non-nesting females without their own nest in a given year and nesting females that lay some of their eggs parasitically. There is no evidence for lifelong professional brood parasites; non-nesting females apparently adopt parasitism to make the best of a bad job, although we lack a clear understanding of the specific constraints that prevent these females from nesting or the costs that make restraint a better option. Parasitism by nesting females is common, surprisingly so in the precocial waterfowl, and is only rarely associated with breeding interruption or nest loss. Nesting females appear to use parasitism to enhance their reproductive output, but for most species it is not clear why females don’t lay the additional eggs in their own nest. A full understanding of this form of brood parasitism will require a better understanding of clutch size constraints.

Keywords

Conspecific brood parasitism Empirical studies Review Hypotheses Life history 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the following for funding: NSF IOS 1355208 (JME), D. G. Raveling Endowment (JME), and NSF IOS 1354894 (BEL). We thank M. Soler for the opportunity to contribute this chapter and M. Soler and Y. Yom-Tov for helpful comments.

References

  1. Åhlund M (2005) Behavioural tactics at nest visits differ between parasites and hosts in a brood-parasitic duck. Anim Behav 70:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åhlund M, Andersson M (2001) Brood parasitism – female ducks can double their reproduction. Nature 414:600–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson M (2017) Helping relatives survive and reproduce: inclusive fitness and reproductive value in brood parasitism. Am Nat 189:138–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson M (1984) Brood parasitism within species. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers: strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Croom Helm, London, pp 195–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson M (2001) Relatedness and the evolution of conspecific brood parasitism. Am Nat 158:599–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersson M, Åhlund M (2001) Protein fingerprinting: a new technique reveals extensive conspecific brood parasitism. Ecology 82:1433–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersson M, Åhlund M (2012) Don’t put all your eggs in one nest: spread them and cut time at risk. Am Nat 180:354–363.  https://doi.org/10.1086/667191 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Andersson M, Eriksson MOG (1982) Nest parasitism in goldeneyes Bucephala clangula – some evolutionary aspects. Am Nat 120:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ankney CD, MacInnes CD (1978) Nutrient reserves and reproductive performance of female Lesser Snow Geese. Auk 95:459–471Google Scholar
  10. Arnold TW, Rohwer FC (1991) Do egg formation costs limit clutch size in waterfowl – a skeptical view. Condor 93:1032–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arnold TW, Rohwer FC, Armstrong T (1987) Egg viability, nest predation, and the adaptive significance of clutch size in prairie ducks. Am Nat 130:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brockmann HJ (2001) The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. In: Advances in the study of behavior, vol 30. Academic, San Diego, pp 1–51Google Scholar
  13. Brown CR (1984) Laying eggs in a neighbors nest benefit and cost of colonial nesting in swallows. Science 224:518–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown CR, Brown MB (1988) A new form of reproductive parasitism in cliff swallows. Nature 331:66–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown CR, Brown MB (1991) Selection of high-quality host nests by parasitic cliff swallows. Anim Behav 41:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bulmer MG (1984) Risk avoidance and nesting strategies. J Theor Biol 106:529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Eadie JM (1989) Alternative female reproductive tactics in a precocial bird: the ecology and evolution of brood parasitism in Goldeneyes. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  19. Eadie JM (1991) Constraint and opportunity in the evolution of brood parasitism in waterfowl. Acta XX Congr Int Ornithol 20:1031–1040Google Scholar
  20. Eadie JM, Fryxell JM (1992) Density-dependence, frequency-dependence, and alternative nesting strategies in goldeneyes. Am Nat 140:621–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Eadie JM, Lyon BE (1998) Cooperation, conflict, and creching behavior in goldeneye ducks. Am Nat 151:397–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Eadie JM, Lyon BE (2011) The relative role of relatives in conspecific brood parasitism. Mol Ecol 20:5114–5118.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05320.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Eadie JM, Kehoe FP, Nudds TD (1988) Pre-hatch and post-hatch brood amalgamation in North American Anatidae: a review of hypotheses. Can J Zool 66:1709–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eadie J, Semel B, Sherman PW (1998) Conspecific brood parasitism, population dynamics, and the conservation of cavity-nesting birds. In: Caro T (ed) Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 306–340Google Scholar
  25. Eadie JM, Smith JNM, Zadworny D, Kuhnlein U, Cheng K (2010) Probing parentage in parasitic birds: an evaluation of methods to detect conspecific brood parasitism using goldeneyes Bucephala islandica and Bl. clangula as a test case. J Avian Biol 41:163–176.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04735.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feare CJ (1991) Intraspecific nest parasitism in starlings Sturnus vulgaris – effects of disturbance on laying females. Ibis 133:75–79.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04813.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Field J (1992) Intraspecific parasitism as an alternative reproductive tactic in nest-building wasps and bees. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 67:79–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibbons DW (1986) Brood parasitism and cooperative nesting in the moorhen, Gallinula chloropus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:221–232Google Scholar
  29. Gowaty PA, Bridges WC (1991) Nestbox availability affects extra-pair fertilizations and conspecific nest parasitism in eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Anim Behav 41:661–675.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80904-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gowaty PA, Karlin AA (1984) Multiple maternity and paternity in single broods of apparently monogamous eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:263–263Google Scholar
  32. Henson SA, Warner RR (1997) Male and female alternative reproductive behaviors in fishes: a new approach using intersexual dynamics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:571–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hepp GR, Kennamer RA, Harvey IVWF (1990) Incubation as a reproductive cost in female Wood Ducks. Auk 107:756–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hopper KR, Rosenheim JA, Prout T, Oppenheim SJ (2003) Within-generation bet hedging: a seductive explanation? Oikos 101:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hötker H (2000) Conspecific nest parasitism in the Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta. Ibis 142:280–288.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2000.tb04867.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaatinen K, Lehtonen J, Kokko H (2011) Strategy selection under conspecific brood parasitism: an integrative modeling approach. Behav Ecol 22:144–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson WM (1992) Estimating conspecific nest parasitism in the northern masked weaver based on within-female variability in egg appearance. Auk 109:435–443Google Scholar
  38. Jackson WM (1993) Causes of conspecific nest parasitism in the northern masked weaver. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00164044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kimwele C, Graves J (2003) A molecular genetic analysis of the communal nesting of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Mol Ecol 12:229–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lack D (1967) The significance of clutch-size in waterfowl. Wildfowl 18:125–128Google Scholar
  41. Ligon JD, Burt DB (2004) Evolutionary origins. In: Koenig W, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Lopez-Sepulcre A, Kokko H (2002) The role of kin recognition in the evolution of conspecific brood parasitism. Anim Behav 64:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lyon BE (1993) Conspecific brood parasitism as a flexible female reproductive tactic in American coots. Anim Behav 46:911–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lyon BE (1998) Optimal clutch size and conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 392:380–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lyon BE (2003) Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422:495–499.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01505 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lyon BE, Eadie JM (2000) Family matters: kin selection and the evolution of conspecific brood parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:12942–12944CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Lyon BE, Eadie JM (2008) Conspecific brood parasitism in birds: a life-history perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:343–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lyon, BE, Eadie JM (2017) A comprehensive survey of the life history aspects of conspecific brood parasitism in birds. Dataset posted at Figshare.  https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4787872
  49. Lyon BE, Montgomerie R (2012) Sexual selection is a form of social selection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 367:2266–2273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McRae SB (1996) Brood parasitism in the Moorhen: brief encounters between parasites and hosts and the significance of an evening laying hour. J Avian Biol 27:311–320.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3677262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McRae SB (1998) Relative reproductive success of female moorhens using conditional strategies of brood parasitism and parental care. Behav Ecol 9:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McRae SB, Burke T (1996) Intraspecific brood parasitism in the moorhen: parentage and parasite-host relationships determined by DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Milonoff M (1989) Can nest predation limit clutch size in precocial birds? Oikos 55:424–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Milonoff M, Paananen P (1993) Egg formation, brood survival, and cost of reproduction as clutch-size-determining factors in common goldeneyes. Auk 110:943–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Møller AP (1987) Intraspecific nest parasitism and antiparasite behavior in swallows, Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 35:247–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(87)80230-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Møller AP (1989) Intraspecific nest parasitism in the swallow Hirundo rustica – the importance of neighbors. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:33–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00299708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nielsen CR, Parker PG, Gates RJ (2006) Intraspecific nest parasitism of cavity-nesting wood ducks: costs and benefits to hosts and parasites. Anim Behav 72:917–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Odell NS, Eadie JM (2010) Do wood ducks use the quantity of eggs in a nest as a cue to the nest’s value? Behav Ecol 21:794–801.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (2008) Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Payne RB (1977) Ecology of brood parasitism in birds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 8:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pöysä H (1999) Conspecific nest parasitism is associated with inequality in nest predation risk in the common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula). Behav Ecol 10:533–540.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/10.5.533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pöysä H (2003) Low host recognition tendency revealed by experimentally induced parasitic egg laying in the common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula). Can J Zool 81:1561–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pöysä H (2006) Public information and conspecific nest parasitism in goldeneyes: targeting safe nests by parasites. Behav Ecol 17:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Hughes CR (1993) Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol Evol 8:285–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Robertson GJ (1998) Egg adoption can explain joint egg-laying in common eiders. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:289–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rohwer FC (1985) The adaptive significance of clutch size in prairie ducks. Auk 102:354–361Google Scholar
  67. Rohwer FC, Freeman S (1989) The distribution of conspecific nest parasitism in birds. Can J Zool 67:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rubenstein DI (1982) Risk, uncertainty and evolutionary strategies. In: Kings’s College Sociobiology Group (ed) Current problems in sociobiolgy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–111Google Scholar
  69. Saitou T (2001) Floaters as intraspecific brood parasites in the grey starling Sturnus cineraceus. Ecol Res 16:221–231.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00388.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schielzeth H, Bolund E (2010) Patterns of conspecific brood parasitism in zebra finches. Anim Behav 79:1329–1337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Semel B, Sherman PW (2001) Intraspecific parasitism and nest-site competition in wood ducks. Anim Behav 61:787–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shaw RC, Hauber ME (2012) Linking nest predation with brood parasitism in captive zebra finches: a multi-pair study. J Ethol 30:255–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0319-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sorenson MD (1991) The functional significance of parasitic egg laying and typical nesting in redhead ducks: an analysis of individual behaviour. Anim Behav 42:771–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sorenson MD (1993) Parasitic egg-laying in Canvasbacks – frequency, success, and individual behavior. Auk 110:57–69Google Scholar
  75. Stouffer PC, Power HW (1991) Brood parasitism by starlings experimentally forced to desert their nests. Anim Behav 41:537–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wrege PH, Emlen ST (1987) Biochemical determination of parental uncertainty in white-fronted bee-eaters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00299728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yom-Tov Y (1980) Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 55:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yom-Tov Y (2001) An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis 143:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zink AG (2000) The evolution of intraspecific brood parasitism in birds and insects. Am Nat 155:395–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Zink AG, Lyon BE (2016) Evolution of conspecific brood parasitism versus cooperative breeding as alternative reproductive tactics. Am Nat 187:35–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, Animal Behavior and Ecology Graduate GroupsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations