Advertisement

Conspecific Brood Parasitism Among Birds: The Effects of Phylogeny, Mode of Reproduction and Geographic Distribution

  • Yoram Yom-Tov
  • Eli Geffen
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

We updated the list of species for which conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) has been reported, and it contained 256 species. We used this list to examine the effects of four factors on the rate of CBP (defined as the percentage of species where CBP was observed in a family), namely, phylogeny, geographic distribution, mode of reproduction (i.e. altricial/precocial) and diversification rate (mean number of species per genus in a family). CBP is influenced by phylogeny, appears to have multiple origins and has evolved many times in various branches of the avian phylogeny tree. As already well known, it is much more prominent among precocial than altricial birds, in which in some families of the former, most species (around 60% among Anatidae) and in some small families, even all species engage in CBP. In contrast, among altricial birds the highest levels of CBP are much lower and are found in the Ploceidae (14.5% of species) and Turdidae (12.8%). Of the three other examined parameters, only the mode of reproduction was significantly related to the rate of CBP, but accounted for only ~2% of the variation. Diversification rate and geographic distribution area were not correlated with CBP. These results further confirm that CBP is influenced by phylogeny and mode of reproduction. Literature searches revealed that the rate of appearance of articles on CBP typically increased for several years, starting in the late 1970s and early 1980s, levelled off during the first decade of the twenty-first century and then declined. This would seem to represent a recent decline in interest in the CBP phenomenon.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Manolo Soler for inviting us to write a chapter for this book and for his constructive comments. We thank Fugo Takasu and especially Bruce Lyon for their helpful criticism and suggestions for the improvement of the article. We thank Naomi Paz for editing the article.

References1

  1. Andersson M (2001) Relatedness and the evolution of conspecific nest parasitism. Am Nat 158:599–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ar A, Yom-Tov Y (1978) The evolution of parental care among birds. Evolution 32:655–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bent AC (1932) Life histories of North American Gallinaceous birds. US Nat. Mus. Bull. no. 162Google Scholar
  4. Bird KL, Aldridge CL, Carpenter JE, Paszkowski CA, Boyce MS, Coltman DW (2013) The secret sex lives of sage-grouse: multiple paternity and intraspecific nest parasitism revealed through genetic analysis. Behav Ecol 24:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig A, Feare C (2009) Family Sturnidae (starlings). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie DA (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world – Vol 14, Bush-shrikes to old world sparrows. Lynx ediciones, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  6. Davanço PV, Souza LMS, Oliveira LS, Francisco MR (2012) Intraspecific brood parasitism of the pale-breasted thrush (Turdus leucomelas). Wilson J Ornithol 124:611–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie DA (eds) (1992–2011) Handbook of the birds of the world. Lynx Edicions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  8. Duda N, Chetnicki W, Jadwiszczak P (2003) Intra-specific nest parasitism in black-headed gull Larus ridibundus. Ardea 91:122–124Google Scholar
  9. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geffen E, Yom-Tov Y (2001) Factors affecting the rate of intraspecific nest parasitism among Anseriformes and Galliformes. Anim Behav 62:1027–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jamieson IG, McRae SB, Simmons RE, Trewby M (2000) High rates of conspecific brood parasitism and egg rejection in Coots and Moorhens in ephemeral wetlands in Namibia. Auk 117:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lesobre, L, Lacroix F, Nuz E, Hingrat Y, Chalah T, Saint Jaime M (2010) Absence of male reproductive skew, along with high frequency of polyandry and conspecific brood parasitism in the lekking Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata. J Avian Biol 41:117-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ležalová-Piálková R (2011) Molecular evidence for extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in the black-headed gull. Intraspecific brood parasitism. J Ornithol 152:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ležalová-Piálková R, Honza M (2008) Responses of black-headed gulls Larus ridibundus to conspecific brood parasitism. J Ornithol 149:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lyon BE, Eadie JMA (2000) Family matters: kin selection and the evolution of conspecific brood parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12942–12944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyon BE, Eadie JMA (2004) An obligate brood parasite trapped in the intraspecific arms race of its hosts. Nature 432:390–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyon BE, Eadie JMA (2008) Conspecific brood parasitism in birds: a life-history perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:343–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2016) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.10. http://mesquiteproject.org
  20. Midford PET, Garland T Jr, Maddison W (2002) PDAP: PDTREE package for Mesquite, Version 1.00Google Scholar
  21. Minias P, Minias A, Jarosław A, Dziadek J (2014) Occurrence of extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in the whiskered tern Chlidonias hybrida. Bird Study 61:130–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nice MM (1962) Development and behavior in precocial birds. Trans Linn Soc NY 8:1–211Google Scholar
  23. Paillisson J-M, Latraube F, Marion L, Bretagnolle V (2008) Indirect evidence of conspecific nest parasitism in the colonial whiskered tern (Chlidonias hybrida). C R Biol 331:559–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Payne RB (1977) The ecology of brood parasitism in birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peer BD (2010) Conspecific brood parasitism by the Dickcissel. Wilson J Ornithol 122:186–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petersen MR, Grand JB, Dau CP (2000) Spectacled eider (Somateria fischeri). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, no. 547. USGS, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  27. Quillfeldt P, Masello J, Segelbacher G (2012) Extra-pair paternity in seabirds: a review and case study of thin-billed prions Pachyptila belcheri. J Ornithol 153:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Riehl C (2010) A simple rule reduces costs of extragroup parasitism in a communally breeding bird. Curr Biol 20:1830–1833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan PG, Dyer BM, Martin AP, Ward VL, Whittington PA, Williams AJ (2013) Supernormal clutches in southern African kelp gulls Larus dominicanus vetula. Ostrich 84:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scholl T, Winkel W, Lubjuhn T (2008) Molecular genetic evidence for mixed maternity in broods of the coal tit Parus ater. Vogelwarte 46:223–227Google Scholar
  31. Sorenson MD (1992) Comment: why is conspecific nest parasitism more frequent in waterfowl than in other birds? Can J Zool 70:1856–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sorenson MD (1995) Evidence of conspecific nest parasitism and egg discrimination in the Sora. Condor 97:819–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tucker AM, Dyer RJ, Huber SK, Bulluck LP (2016) Opportunistic conspecific brood parasitism in a box-nesting population of prothonotary warblers (Protonotaria citrea). Auk 133:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vedder O, Komdeur J, van der Velde M, Magrath MJL (2010) Conclusive evidence for conspecific brood parasitism in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus: a reply to Griffith et al. J Avian Biol 41:348–349Google Scholar
  35. Weaver HB, Brown CR, Sealy SG (2004) Brood parasitism and egg transfer in cave swallows (Petrochelidon fulva) and cliff swallows (P. pyrrhonota) in South Texas. Auk 121:1122–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wiebe KL, Kempenaers B (2009) The social and genetic mating system in flickers linked to partially reversed sex roles. Behav Ecol 20:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yom-Tov Y (1980) Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Biol Rev 55:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yom-Tov Y (2001) An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis 143:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2006) On the origin of brood parasitism in altricial birds. Behav Ecol 17:196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations