Advertisement

Begging Behaviour, Food Delivery and Food Acquisition in Nests with Brood Parasitic Nestlings

  • Manuel Soler
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

The existence of a brood parasitic nestling in a host nest implies an intrusion in the parent–offspring communication system, which will have important implications in both food delivery by parents and food acquisition by nestlings. The aim of this chapter is to review such implications taking into account two issues that are crucial in both food delivery and food acquisition in nonparasitized nests: breeding strategy of the species (brood reducer or clutch-size adjuster) and difference in size among nestlings in a brood. First, I review mechanisms allowing brood parasitic nestlings to secure parental provisioning from unrelated caregivers, such as exaggerated begging, mimicry of host begging calls, emitting a begging call that stimulates a wide range of hosts, tuning the begging call in a way that optimizes food provisioning, mimicking the begging calls of a brood, integrating visual and vocal nestling displays and procuring host assistance at the nest. Second, I review evidence showing that exaggerated begging behaviour exhibited by brood parasitic nestlings influences begging behaviour of their nestmates and food distribution decisions by foster parents. In addition, I present novel data testing the “integration of signals” hypothesis.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the reviewers Tomas Grim, Rebecca Kilner and James River for their constructive and helpful comments and José Ángel Soler Ortiz and Manuel Martín-Vivaldi for making Figs. 27.1 and 27.2, respectively. In addition, I thank M. Martín-Vivaldi, E. Røskaft, C. Moskát and J.J. Palomino for allowing me to include in this chapter our unpublished results testing the integration of signals hypothesis.

References

  1. Álvarez F (1994) A gens of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitizing rufous bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes. J Avian Biol 25:239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvarez F (2004) The conspicuous gape of the nestling common cuckoo Cuculus canorus as a supernormal stimulus for rufous bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes hosts. Ardea 92:63–68Google Scholar
  3. Bengtsson H, Ryden O (1983) Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behavior in asynchronously hatched broods of the great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolopo D, Canestrari D, Roldán M, Baglione V, Soler M (2015) High begging intensity of great spotted cuckoo nestlings favours larger-size crow nest mates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:873–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boncoraglio G, Saino N, Garamszegi LZ (2009) Begging and cowbirds: brood parasites make hosts scream louder. Behav Ecol 20:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briskie JV, Naugler CT, Leech SM (1994) Begging intensity of nestling birds varies with sibling relatedness. Proc R Soc B 258:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butchart SHM, Kilner RM, Fuisz T, Davies NB (2003) Differences in the nestling calls of hosts and host-races of the common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Anim Behav 65:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caro SM, Griffin AS, Hinde CA, West SA (2016) Unpredictable environments lead to the evolution of parental neglect in birds. Nat Commun 7:10985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies NB, Kilner RM, Noble DG (1998) Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc R Soc B 265:673–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dearborn DC (1998) Begging behavior and food acquisition by brown-headed cowbird nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dearborn DC (1999) Brown headed cowbird nestling vocalizations and risk of nest predation. Auk 116:448–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dearborn DC, Lichtenstein G (2002) Begging behaviour and host exploitation in parasitic cowbirds. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 361–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dearborn DC, Anders AD, Thompson FR III, Faaborg J (1998) Effects of cowbird parasitism on parental provisioning and nestling food acquisition and growth. Condor 100:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glassey B, Forbes S (2003) Why brown-headed cowbirds do not influence red-winged blackbird parent behaviour. Anim Behav 65:1235–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gloag R, Kacelnik A (2013) Host manipulation via begging call structure in the brood-parasitic shiny cowbird. Anim Behav 86:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gloag R, Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC, Kacelnik A (2012) The economics of nestmate killing in avian brood parasites: a provisions trade-off. Behav Ecol 23:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grayson P, Glassey B, Forbes S (2013) Does brood parasitism induce paternal care in a polygynous host? Ethology 119:439–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grim T (2006) The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res 8:785–802Google Scholar
  20. Grim T (2007) Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc B 274:373–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grim T (2008) Wing-shaking and wing-patch as nestling begging strategies: their importance and evolutionary origins. J Ethol 26:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grim T, Honza M (2001) Does supernormal stimulus influence parental behaviour of the cuckoo’s host? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O (2003) Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc B 270:S73–S75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Grim T, Rutila J, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009) Experimentally constrained virulence is costly for common cuckoo chicks. Ethology 115:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol 80:508–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grim T, Tyller Z, Samaš P (2017) Unusual diet of brood parasite nestlings and its fitness consequences. Auk 134:732–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haskell DG (2002) Begging behavior and nest predation. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hauber ME (2003) Lower begging responsiveness of host versus parasitic Brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) nestlings is related to species identity but not to early social experience. J Comp Psychol 117:24–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hauber ME, Kilner RM (2007) Coevolution, communication, and host chick mimicry in parasitic finches: who mimics whom? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hauber ME, Montenegro K (2002) What are the costs of raising a brood parasite? Comparing host parental care at parasitized and non-parasitized broods. Etología 10:1–9Google Scholar
  31. Hauber ME, Moskat C (2008) Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts. Behav Ecol 19:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoover JP, Reetz MJ (2006) Brood parasitism increases provisioning rate and reduces offspring recruitment and adult return rates in a cowbird host. Oecologia 149:165–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Arco L, Soler M (2012) Experimental evidence for a predation cost of begging using active nests and real chicks. J Ornithol 153:801–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kedar H, Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Yedvab S, Lotem A, Winkler DW (2000) Learning modifies offspring signaling of need to their parents. Proc R Soc B 267:1723–1727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kilner RM (2003) How selfish is a cowbird nestling? Anim Behav 66:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kilner RM (2005) The evolution of virulence in brood parasites. Ornithol Sci 4:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kilner RM, Davies NB (1999) How selfish is a cuckoo chick? Anim Behav 58:797–808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kilner RM, Davies NB, Noble DG (1999a) Signals of need in parent-offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397:667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kilner RM, Noble DG, Davies NB (1999b) How should cuckoo chicks signal in different host nests? Trends Ecol Evol 14:322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kilner RM, Madden JR, Hauber ME (2004) Brood parasitic cowbird nestlings use host young to procure resources. Science 305:877–879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kilpatrick AM (2002) Variation in growth of brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) nestlings and energetic impacts on their host parents. Can J Zool 80:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lack D (1947) The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89:302–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Langmore NE, Maurer G, Adcock GJ, Kilner RM (2008) Socially acquired host-specific mimicry and the evolution of host races in Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis. Evolution 62:1689–1699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Leonard ML, Horn AG (1998) Need and nestmates affect begging in tree swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lichtenstein G (2001) Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitizing rufous-bellied thrushes: chick–chick competition or parental discrimination? Anim Behav 61:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lichtenstein G, Dearborn DC (2004) Begging and short-term need in cowbird nestlings: how different are brood parasites? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lichtenstein G, Sealy SG (1998) Nestling competition, rather than supernormal stimulus, explains the success of parasitic brown-headed cowbird chicks in yellow warbler nests. Proc R Soc B 265:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lorenzana JC, Sealy SG (1999) A meta-analysis of the impact of parasitism by the brown-headed cowbird on its hosts. Stud Avian Biol 18:241–253Google Scholar
  49. Madden JR, Davies NB (2006) A host-race difference in begging calls of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus develop through experience and increases host provisioning. Proc R Soc B 273:2343–2345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Martín-Gálvez D, Soler M, Soler JJ, Martín-Vivaldi M, Palomino JJ (2005) Food acquisition by common cuckoo chicks in rufous bush robin nests and the advantage of eviction behaviour. Anim Behav 70:1313–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool Lond 236:625–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moskát C, Honza M (2000) Effect of nest and nest site characteristics on the risk of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Ecography 23:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pagnucco K, Zanette L, Clinchy M, Leonard ML (2008) Sheep in wolf’s clothing: host nestling vocalizations resemble their cowbird competitor’s. Proc R Soc B 275:1061–1065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Payne RB, Payne LL (1998) Nestling eviction and vocal begging behaviors in the Australian glossy cuckoos Chrysococcyx basalis and C. lucidus. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 152–169Google Scholar
  55. Payne RB, Payne LL (2002) Begging for parental care from another species: specialization and generalization in brood-parasitic finches. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 429–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Price K, Ydenberg R (1995) Begging and provisioning in broods of asynchronously- hatched yellow-headed blackbird nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Redondo T, Zuñiga JM (2002) Dishonest begging and host manipulation by Clamator cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 389–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rivers JW (2007) Nestmate size, but not short-term need, influences begging behavior of a generalist brood parasite. Behav Ecol 18:222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rivers JW (2009) Parent-absent begging in the Brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater): the role of short-term need and nestmate size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rivers JW, Peer BD (2016) Relatedness constrains virulence in an obligate avian brood parasite. Ornithol Sci 15:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rivers JW, Loughin TM, Rothstein SI (2010) Brown-headed cowbird nestlings influence nestmate begging, but not parental feeding, in hosts of three distinct sizes. Anim Behav 79:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rivers JW, Blundell MA, Loughin TM, Peer BD, Rothstein SI (2013) The exaggerated begging behavior of an obligate avian brood parasite is shared with a nonparasitic close relative. Anim Behav 86:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rivers JW, Blundell MA, Rothstein SI (2014) Mismatched begging displays between foreign and host offspring reduced brood parasite fitness. Behav Ecol 25:785–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robinson SK, Rothstein SI, Brittingham MC, Petit LJ, Grzybowski JA (1995) Ecology and behaviour of cowbirds and their impact on host populations. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 428–460Google Scholar
  65. Roldán M, Soler M (2011) Parental care parasitism: how unrelated offspring attain acceptance by foster parents? Behav Ecol 22:679–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roldán M, Martín-Gálvez D, Rodríguez J, Soler M (2013) Breeding biology and fledgling survival in a carrion crow Corvus corone population of southern Spain: a comparison of group and pair breeder. Acta Ornithol 48:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Royle NJ, Hartley IR, Parker GA (2002) Begging for control: when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest? Trends Ecol Evol 17:434–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Skipper BR (2008) Influence of parental provisioning and Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism on Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) nestling mass. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska at KearneyGoogle Scholar
  69. Smiseth PT, Bu RJ, Eikenæs AK, Amundsen T (2003) Food limitation in asynchronous bluethroat broods: effects on food distribution, nestling begging, and parental provisioning rules. Behav Ecol 14:793–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Soler M (2001) Begging behaviour of nestlings and food delivery by parents: the importance of breeding strategy. Acta Ethol 4:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Soler M (2002) Breeding strategy and begging intensity: influences on food delivery by parents and host selection by parasitic cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Soler M (2008) Do hosts of interspecific brood parasites feed parasitic chicks with lower quality prey? Anim Behav 76:1761–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Soler M, de Neve L (2012) Great spotted cuckoo nestlings but not magpie nestlings starve in experimental age-matched broods. Ethology 118:1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Soler M, de Neve L (2013) Brood mate eviction or brood mate acceptance by brood parasitic nestlings? An experimental study with the non-evictor great spotted cuckoo and its magpie host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:601–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Soler M, Soler JJ (1999) The cuckoo chick tricks their reed warbler foster parents, but what about other host species? Trends Ecol Evol 14:296–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Soler M, Martínez JG, Soler JJ, Møller AP (1995) Preferential allocation of food by magpie Pica pica to great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Soler M, de Neve L, Roldán M, Macías-Sánchez E, Martín-Gálvez D (2012) Do great spotted cuckoo nestlings beg dishonestly? Anim Behav 83:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Soler M, Macías-Sánchez E, Martín-Gálvez D, de Neve L (2017) Complex feeding behaviour by magpies in nests with great spotted cuckoo nestlings. J Avian Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01473
  79. Soler M, de Neve L, Macías-Sánchez E, Pérez-Contreras T (2018) Despite a higher vigilance, great spotted cuckoos incur less erroneous begging when hungry than their magpie host nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (in press)Google Scholar
  80. Tanaka KD, Ueda K (2005) Horsfield’s hawk-cuckoo nestlings simulate multiple gapes for begging. Science 308:653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Teather KL (1992) An experimental study of competition for food between male and female nestlings of the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ursino CA, De Marsico MC, Sued M, Farall A, Reboreda JC (2011) Brood parasitism disproportionately increases nest provisioning and helper recruitment in a cooperatively breeding bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2279–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang N, Kimball R (2012) Nestmate killing by obligate brood parasitic chicks: is this linked to obligate siblicidal behavior? J Ornithol 153:825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. West MJ, King AP (1998) Female visual displays affect the development of male song in the Cowbird. Nature 334:244–246Google Scholar
  85. Wright J, Leonard M (2002) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yasukawa K, Berrios HK, Johannes AW (2016) A test of the nestling discrimination hypothesis for parasitism of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Wilson J Ornithol 128:441–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zanette L, MacDougall-Shakleton E, Clinchy M, Smith JNM (2005) Brown-headed cowbirds skew host offspring sex ratios. Ecology 86:815–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Grupo Coevolución, Unidad Asociada al CSICUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations