Advertisement

Adaptations of Brood Parasitic Eggs

  • Bård G. Stokke
  • Frode Fossøy
  • Eivin Røskaft
  • Arne Moksnes
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

This chapter deals with adaptations of brood parasitic eggs, which has received a lot of attention by researchers and naturalists for centuries. Both scientists and laymen are intrigued by the sophisticated traits that are enabling parasites to fool or force their hosts into accepting their eggs. A range of brood parasites have evolved mimetic or cryptic eggs to counter host egg rejection or to counter rejection from competing brood parasites. Mimetic eggs resemble host eggs in appearance. Cryptic eggs may appear non-mimetic to host eggs but tend to blend in with the nest lining or “disappear” in the darkness of the (cavity) nest. Rather than being mimetic or cryptic, parasites may also produce eggs that appear attractive to their hosts. In addition, a thick eggshell and a short incubation time may also be advantageous in relation to their brood parasitic lifestyle. The occurrence and importance of these traits among various brood parasites are discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Manuel Soler, Marcel Honza and Francisco Ruiz-Raya for their good and constructive comments that significantly improved the quality of the text.

References

  1. Aidala Z, Croston R, Schwartz J, Tong L, Hauber ME (2015) The role of egg–nest contrast in the rejection of brood parasitic eggs. J Exp Biol 218:1126–1136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alicia De La Colina M, Mahler B, Carlos Reboreda J (2011) Differences in morphology and colour pattern of shiny cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis) eggs found in nests of two hosts. Biol J Linn Soc 102:838–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez F (1994) A gens of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitizing rufous bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes. J Avian Biol 25:239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez F (1999) Attractive non-mimetic stimuli in cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs. Ibis 141:142–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvarez F (2000) Response to common cuckoo Cuculus canorus model egg size by a parasitized population of rufous bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes. Ibis 142:683–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez F (2003) Relationship between egg size and shape of an Iberian population of common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and its host. Ardea 91:127–129Google Scholar
  7. Alvarez F, Arias de Reyna L, Segura M (1976) Experimental brood parasitism of the magpie (Pica pica). Anim Behav 24:907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Kleven O, Honza M, Røskaft E (2006a) Eggshell strength of an obligate brood parasite: a test of the puncture resistance hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2006b) Egg rejection in marsh warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk 123:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2007) First evidence of regular common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, parasitism on eastern olivaceous warblers, Hippolais pallida eldeica. Naturwissenschaften 94:307–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2008a) Does the cuckoo benefit from laying unusually strong eggs? Anim Behav 76:1893–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2008b) Getting rid of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg: why do hosts delay rejection? Behav Ecol 19:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2009) Evidence for egg discrimination preceding failed rejection attempts in a small cuckoo host. Biol Lett 5:169–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Antonov A, Vikan JR, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Ranke PS, Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Møller AP, Shykoff JA (2010) Egg phenotype differentiation in sympatric cuckoo Cuculus canorus gentes. J Evol Biol 23:1170–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Antonov A, Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Spasova V, Vikan JR, Moksnes A, Yang C, Liang W, Røskaft E (2011) Egg discrimination in an open nesting passerine under dim light conditions. Ethology 117:1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Liang W, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Yang C, Møller AP (2012) Why do brood parasitic birds lay strong-shelled eggs? Chin Birds 3:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Avilés JM, Pérez-Contreras T, Navarro C, Soler JJ (2008) Dark nests and conspicuousness in color patterns of nestlings of altricial birds. Am Nat 171:327–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Avilés JM, Martín-Gálvez D, De Neve L, Soler M, Soler JJ (2015) Ambient light in domed nests and discrimination of foreign egg colors. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Baker E (1942) Cuckoo problems. Witherby, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Baldamus E (1853) Neue Beiträge zur Fortpflanzungsgeschichte des Kuckuchs, Cuculus canorus. Naumannia 3:307–325Google Scholar
  21. Bán M, Barta Z, Muñoz AR, Takasu F, Nakamura H, Moskát C (2011) The analysis of common cuckoo's egg shape in relation to its hosts’ in two geographically distant areas. J Zool 284:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Berkowic D, Stokke BG, Meiri S, Markman S (2015) Climate change and coevolution in the cuckoo–reed warbler system. Evol Ecol 29:581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Birkhead TR, Hemmings N, Spottiswoode CN, Mikulica O, Moskát C, Bán M, Schulze-Hagen K (2011) Internal incubation and early hatching in brood parasitic birds. Proc R Soc B 278:1019–1024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Brooke MD, Davies NB (1988) Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335:630–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brooke MD, Davies NB (1989) Provisioning of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus by reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus hosts. Ibis 131:250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brooker MG, Brooker LC (1989) The comparative breeding behaviour of two sympatric cuckoos, Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chrysococcyx basalts and the shining bronze-cuckoo C. lucidus, in Western Australia: a new model for the evolution of egg morphology and host specificity in avian brood parasites. Ibis 131:528–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brooker MG, Brooker LC (1991) Eggshell strength in cuckoos and cowbirds. Ibis 133:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Caves EM, Stevens M, Iversen ES, Spottiswoode CN (2015) Hosts of avian brood parasites have evolved egg signatures with elevated information content. Proc R Soc B 282Google Scholar
  29. Cherry MI, Bennett ATD (2001) Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo, as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc B 268:565–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cherry MI, Gosler AG (2010) Avian eggshell coloration: new perspectives on adaptive explanations. Biol J Linn Soc 100:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davies NB (1999) Cuckoos and cowbirds versus hosts: co-evolutionary lag and equilibrium. Ostrich 70:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T & AD Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Davies NB, Brooke MD (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers – adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davies NB, Brooke MD (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. 1. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol 58:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Drobniak SM, Dyrcz A, Sudyka J, Cichoń M (2014) Continuous variation rather than specialization in the egg phenotypes of cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) parasitizing two sympatric reed warbler species. PLoS One 9:e106650PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Edvardsen E, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Øien IJ, Honza M (2001) Egg mimicry in cuckoos parasitizing four sympatric species of Acrocephalus warblers. Condor 103:829–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Feeney WE, Stoddard MC, Kilner RM, Langmore NE (2014a) “Jack-of-all-trades” egg mimicry in the brood parasitic Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo? Behav Ecol 25:1365–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Feeney WE, Welbergen JA, Langmore NE (2014b) Advances in the study of coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:227–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fossøy F, Antonov A, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Vikan JR, Møller AP, Shykoff JA, Stokke BG (2011) Genetic differentiation among sympatric cuckoo host races: males matter. Proc R Soc B 278:1639–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fossøy F, Sorenson MD, Liang W, Ekrem T, Moksnes A, Møller AP, Rutila J, Røskaft E, Takasu F, Yang C, Stokke BG (2016) Ancient origin and maternal inheritance of blue cuckoo eggs. Nat Commun 7:10272PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gaston AJ (1976) Brood parasitism by the pied crested cuckoo Clamator jacobinus. J Anim Ecol 45:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gloag R, Keller L-A, Langmore NE (2014) Cryptic cuckoo eggs hide from competing cuckoos. Proc R Soc B 281:20141014PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guigueno MF, Sealy SG, Westphal AM (2014) Rejection of parasitic eggs in passerine hosts: size matters more for a non-ejecter. Auk 131:583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hanley D, Cassey P, Doucet SM (2013) Parents, predators, parasites, and the evolution of eggshell colour in open nesting birds. Evol Ecol 27:593–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hargitai R, Moskát C, Bán M, Gil D, López-Rull I, Solymos E (2010) Eggshell characteristics and yolk composition in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus: are they adapted to brood parasitism? J Avian Biol 41:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harrison CJO (1968) Egg mimicry in British cuckoos. Bird Study 15:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hauber ME, Tong L, Bán M, Croston R, Grim T, Waterhouse GIN, Shawkey MD, Barron AB, Moskát C (2015) The value of artificial stimuli in behavioral research: making the case for egg rejection studies in avian brood parasitism. Ethology 120:1–8Google Scholar
  48. Honza M, Picman J, Grim T, Novák V, Čapek M, Mrlík V (2001) How to hatch from an egg of great structural strength. A study of the common cuckoo. J Avian Biol 32:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Honza M, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Vogl W, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2002) Behaviour of female common cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, in the vicinity of host nests before and during egg laying: a radiotelemetry study. Anim Behav 64:861–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Honza M, Polacikova L, Procházka P (2007) Ultraviolet and green parts of the colour spectrum affect egg rejection in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos). Biol J Linn Soc 92:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Honza M, Procházka P, Morongová K, Čapek M, Jelínek V (2011) Do nest light conditions affect rejection of parasitic eggs? A test of the light environment hypothesis. Ethology 117:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Honza M, Šulc M, Jelínek V, Požgayová M, Procházka P (2014) Brood parasites lay eggs matching the appearance of host clutches. Proc R Soc B 281:20132665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Honza M, Feikusová K, Procházka P, Picman J (2015) How to hatch from the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) egg: implications of strong eggshells for the hatching muscle (Musculus complexus). J Ornithol 156:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Igic B, Braganza K, Hyland MM, Silyn-Roberts H, Cassey P, Grim T, Rutila J, Moskát C, Hauber ME (2011) Alternative mechanisms of increased eggshell hardness of avian brood parasites relative to host species. J R Soc Interface 8:1654–1664PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Igic B, Nunez V, Voss HU, Croston R, Aidala Z, López AV, Van Tatenhove A, Holford ME, Shawkey MD, Hauber ME (2015a) Using 3D printed eggs to examine the egg-rejection behaviour of wild birds. PeerJ 3:e965PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Igic B, Zarate E, Sewell MA, Moskát C, Cassey P, Rutila J, Grim T, Shawkey MD, Hauber ME (2015b) A comparison of egg yolk lipid constituents between parasitic common cuckoos and their hosts. Auk 132:817–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jaeckle WB, Kiefer M, Childs B, Harper RG, Rivers JW, Peer BD (2012) Comparison of eggshell porosity and estimated gas flux between the brown-headed cowbird and two common hosts. J Avian Biol 43:486–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jenner E (1788) Observations on the natural history of the cuckoo. By Mr. Edward Jenner. In a letter to John Hunter, Esq. F. R. S. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 78:219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jensen RAC (1966) Genetics of cuckoo egg polymorphism. Nature 209:827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kattan GH (1995) Mechanisms of short incubation period in brood-parasitic cowbirds. Auk 112:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kilner RM (2006) The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol Rev 81:383–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kilner RM, Langmore NE (2011) Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biol Rev 86:836–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Krüger O (2011) Brood parasitism selects for no defence in a cuckoo host. Proc R Soc B 278:2777–2783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Krüger O, Davies NB (2002) The evolution of cuckoo parasitism: a comparative analysis. Proc R Soc B 269:375–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Krüger O, Davies NB (2004) The evolution of egg size in the brood parasitic cuckoos. Behav Ecol 15:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Langmore N, Kilner R (2009) Why do Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis eggs mimic those of their hosts? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1127–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Langmore N, Spottiswoode CN (2012) Visual trickery in avian brood parasites. In: Hughes D, Brodeur J, Thomas F (eds) Host manipulation by parasites. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM (2003) Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature 422:157–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Langmore NE, Kilner RM, Butchart SHM, Maurer G, Davies NB, Cockburn A, Macgregor NA, Peters A, Magrath MJL, Dowling DK (2005) The evolution of egg rejection by cuckoo hosts in Australia and Europe. Behav Ecol 16:686–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Kilner RM (2009) Are dark cuckoo eggs cryptic in host nests? Anim Behav 78:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lawes MJ, Kirkman S (1996) Egg recognition and interspecific brood parasitism rates in red bishops (Aves: Ploceidae). Anim Behav 52:553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Liang W, Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Vikan JR, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Shykoff JA, Møller AP, Takasu F (2012) Modelling the maintenance of egg polymorphism in avian brood parasites and their hosts. J Evol Biol 25:916–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Marchant S (1972) Evolution of the genus Chrysococcyx. Ibis 114:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Marchetti K (1992) Costs to host defence and the persistence of parasitic cuckoos. Proc R Soc B 248:41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Marchetti K (2000) Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav 59:877–883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Mason P, Rothstein SI (1986) Coevolution and avian brood parasitism: cowbird eggs show evolutionary response to host discrimination. Evolution 40:1207–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mason P, Rothstein SI (1987) Crypsis versus mimicry and the color of shiny cowbird eggs. Am Nat 130:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mcmaster DG, Sealy SG (1998) Short incubation periods of brown-headed cowbirds; how do cowbird eggs hatch before yellow warbler eggs? Condor 100:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Medina I, Langmore NE (2015) Coevolution is linked with phenotypic diversification but not speciation in avian brood parasites. Proc R Soc B 282Google Scholar
  81. Medina I, Troscianko J, Stevens M, Langmore NE (2016) Brood parasitism is linked to egg pattern diversity within and among species of Australian passerines. Am Nat 187:351–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mermoz ME, Ornelas JF (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of life-history adaptations in parasitic cowbirds. Behav Ecol 15:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Meshcheryagina SG, Golovatin MG, Bachurin GN (2016) Experimental study of discrimination behavior in the yellow-browed warbler (Phylloscopus inornatus) brood-parasitized by the oriental cuckoo (Cuculus (saturatus) optatus). Russ J Ecol 47:104–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1992) Responses of some rare cuckoo hosts to mimetic model cuckoo eggs and to foreign conspecific eggs. Ornis Scand 23:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) – an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool 236:625–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT (1991a) Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk 108:348–354Google Scholar
  87. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC (1991b) Behavioral responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour 116:64–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen LG, Honza M, Mork C, Olsen PH (2000) Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis 142:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Moreno J, Lobato E, Morales J, Merino S, Tomas G, Martinez-de la Puente J, Sanz JJ, Mateo R, Soler JJ (2006) Experimental evidence that egg color indicates female condition at laying in a songbird. Behav Ecol 17:651–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Moskát C, Honza M (2002) European cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host's rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. Ibis 144:614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Newton A (1902) Cuckoo. In: Encyclopedia Britannica, 10th edn. Times, LondonGoogle Scholar
  92. Payne RB (1974) The evolution of clutch size and reproductive rates in parasitic cuckoos. Evolution 28:169–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Payne RB (1977) Ecology of brood parasitism in birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Picman J (1989) Mechanism of increased puncture resistance of eggs of brown-headed cowbirds. Auk 106:577–583Google Scholar
  95. Picman J, Honza M (2002) Are house wren Troglodytes aedon eggs unusually strong? Test of the predicted effect of intraspecific egg destruction. Ibis 144:E57–E66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Picman J, Pribil S (1997) Is greater eggshell density an alternative mechanism by which parasitic cuckoos increase the strength of their eggs? J Ornithol 138:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Portugal SJ, Hauber ME, Maurer G, Stokke BG, Grim T, Cassey P (2014) Rapid development of brood-parasitic cuckoo embryos cannot be explained by increased gas exchange through the eggshell. J Zool 293:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Punnett RC (1933) Inheritance of egg-colour in the parasitic cuckoos. Nature 132:892–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pycraft W (1910) A history of birds. Methuen, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rahn H, Curran-Everett L, Booth DT (1988) Eggshell differences between parasitic and nonparasitic Icteridae. Condor 90:962–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rey E (1892) Altes und neues aus dem haushalte des kuckucks. Freese, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  102. Rohwer S, Spaw CD (1988) Evolutionary lag versus bill-size constraints: a comparative study of the acceptance of cowbird eggs by old hosts. Evol Ecol 2:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rohwer S, Spaw CD, Røskaft E (1989) Costs to northern orioles of puncture-ejecting parasitic cowbird eggs from their nests. Auk 106:734–738Google Scholar
  104. Roncalli G, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Soler M (2017) Size and material of model parasitic eggs affect the rejection response of western Bonelli’s warbler Phylloscopus bonelli. Ibis 159:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rothstein SI (1978) Mechanisms of avian egg-recognition – additional evidence for learned components. Anim Behav 26:671–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rothstein SI (1982) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition – which egg parameters elicit responses by rejecter species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ruiz-Raya F, Soler M, Sánchez-Pérez LL, Ibáñez-Álamo JD (2015) Could a factor that does not affect egg recognition influence the decision of rejection? PLoS One 10:e0135624PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Samaš P, Rutila J, Grim T (2016) The common redstart as a suitable model to study cuckoo-host coevolution in a unique ecological context. BMC Evol Biol 16:255PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Schulze-Hagen K, Stokke BG, Birkhead TR (2009) Reproductive biology of the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge. J Ornithol 150:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Segura LN, Di Sallo FG, Mahler B, Reboreda JC (2016) Red-crested cardinals use color and width as cues to reject shiny cowbird eggs. Auk 133:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Skjelseth S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Gibbs HL, Taborsky M, Taborsky B, Honza M, Kleven O (2004) Parentage and host preference in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. J Avian Biol 35:21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Soler M (1990) Relationships between the great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius and its corvid hosts in a recently colonized area. Ornis Scand 21:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Soler M, Martínez JG (2000) Is egg-damaging behavior by great spotted cuckoos an accident or an adaptation? Behav Ecol 11:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Soler M, Soler JJ, Martinez JG (1997) Great spotted cuckoos improve their reproductive success by damaging magpie host eggs. Anim Behav 54:1227–1233PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Soler M, Soler JJ, Pérez-Contreras T (1999) The cost of host egg damage caused by a brood parasite: experiments on great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) and magpies (Pica pica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Soler JJ, Avilés JM, Møller AP, Moreno J (2012a) Attractive blue-green egg coloration and cuckoo−host coevolution. Biol J Linn Soc 106:154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Soler M, Fernández-Morante J, Espinosa F, Martín-Vivaldi M (2012b) Pecking but accepting the parasitic eggs may not reflect ejection failure: the role of motivation. Ethology 118:662–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Soler M, Pérez-Contreras T, de Neve L (2014) Great spotted cuckoos frequently lay their eggs while their magpie host is incubating. Ethology 120:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Soler M, Ruiz-Raya F, Roncalli G, Ibáñez-Álamo JD (2015) Nest desertion cannot be considered an egg-rejection mechanism in a medium-sized host: an experimental study with the common blackbird Turdus merula. J Avian Biol 46:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Soler M, Ruiz-Raya F, Roncalli G, Ibáñez-Álamo JD (2017) Relationships between egg-recognition and egg-ejection in a grasp-ejector species. PLoS One 12:e0166283PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Southern H (1958) Mimicry in cuckoos’ eggs. In: Huxley J, Hardy A, Ford E (eds) Evolution as a process. G. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  122. Spaw CD, Rohwer S (1987) A comparative study of eggshell thickness in cowbirds and other passerines. Condor 89:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Spottiswoode CN (2010) The evolution of host-specific variation in cuckoo eggshell strength. J Evol Biol 23:1792–1799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Spottiswoode CN (2013) A brood parasite selects for its own egg traits. Biol Lett 9:20130573PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Spottiswoode CN, Colebrook-Robjent JFR (2007) Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic Greater Honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations. Behav Ecol 18:792–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M (2012) Host-parasite arms races and rapid changes in bird egg appearance. Am Nat 179:633–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Spottiswoode CN, Stryjewski KF, Quader S, Colebrook-Robjent JFR, Sorenson MD (2011) Ancient host specificity within a single species of brood parasitic bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:17738–17742PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Starling M, Heinsohn R, Cockburn A, Langmore NE (2006) Cryptic gentes revealed in pallid cuckoos Cuculus pallidus using reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc B 273:1929–1934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Stevens M, Troscianko J, Spottiswoode CN (2013) Repeated targeting of the same hosts by a brood parasite compromises host egg rejection. Nat Commun 4:3475Google Scholar
  130. Stoddard MC, Stevens M (2010) Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird’s eye. Proc R Soc B 277:1387–1393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Stoddard MC, Stevens M (2011) Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo. Evolution 65:2004–2013PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Stoddard MC, Marshall KLA, Kilner RM (2011) Imperfectly camouflaged avian eggs: artefact or adaptation? Avian Biol Res 4:196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Stoddard MC, Kilner RM, Town C (2014) Pattern recognition algorithm reveals how birds evolve individual egg pattern signatures. Nat Commun 5:5117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2005) The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Ornithol Sci 4:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Stokke BG, Polačiková L, Dyrcz A, Hafstad I, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2010) Responses of reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus to non-mimetic eggs of different sizes in a nest parasitism experiment. Acta Ornithol 45:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Šulc M, Procházka P, Capek M, Honza M (2016) Common cuckoo females are not choosy when removing an egg during parasitism. Behav Ecol 27:1642–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Swynnerton CFM (1918) VII. Rejections by birds of eggs unlike their own: with remarks on some of the cuckoo problems. Ibis:127–154Google Scholar
  138. Takasu F (2003) Co-evolutionary dynamics of egg appearance in avian brood parasitism. Evol Ecol Res 5:345–362Google Scholar
  139. Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Mahler B, Reboreda JC (2012) Shiny cowbird Molothrus bonariensis egg size and chick growth vary between two hosts that differ markedly in body size. J Avian Biol 43:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Török J, Moskat C, Michl G, Peczely P (2004) Common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) lay eggs with larger yolk but not more testosterone than their great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) hosts. Ethol Ecol Evol 16:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2002) Adaptive significance of egg coloration. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation, behaviour, environment and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–298Google Scholar
  142. Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2006a) Influence of shape on egg discrimination in American robins and gray catbirds. Ethology 112:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2006b) Parameters of brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater egg discrimination in warbling vireos Vireo gilvus. J Avian Biol 37:457–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Vikan JR, Fossøy F, Huhta E, Moksnes A, Roskaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Outcomes of brood parasite-host interactions mediated by egg matching: common cuckoos Cuculus canorus versus Fringilla finches. PLoS One 6:e19288PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. von Haartman L (1981) Co-evolution of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus and a regular cuckoo host. Ornis Fennica 58:1–10Google Scholar
  146. Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection, with some of its applications. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  147. Westmoreland D (2008) Evidence of selection for egg crypsis in conspicuous nests. J Field Ornithol 79:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Westmoreland D, Kiltie RA (2007) Egg coloration and selection for crypsis in open-nesting blackbirds. J Avian Biol 38:682–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Wynne-Edwards VC (1933) Inheritance of egg-colour in the parasitic cuckoo. Nature 132:822–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Yang C, Cai Y, Liang W (2013) Eggs mimicry of common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) utilizing ashy-throated parrotbill (Paradoxornis alphonsianus) host. Chin Birds 4:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Yang C, Huang Q, Wang L, Jiang A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Tunheim OH, Røskaft E, Liang W, Møller AP (2016) Plaintive cuckoos do not select tailorbird hosts that match the phenotypes of their own eggs. Behav Ecol 27:835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Yang C, Liang W, Antonov A, Cai Y, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2012) Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China. Chin Birds 3:9–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Yang C, Liang W, Cai Y, Shi S, Takasu F, Møller A, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2010) Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host. PLoS One 5:e10816PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Zölei A, Hauber ME, Geltsch N, Moskát C (2012) Asymmetrical signal content of egg shape as predictor of egg rejection by great reed warblers, hosts of the common cuckoo. Behaviour 149:391–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bård G. Stokke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frode Fossøy
    • 1
    • 3
  • Eivin Røskaft
    • 1
  • Arne Moksnes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Terrestrial EcologyNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)TrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Department of Aquatic EcologyNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations