Advertisement

Egg Color Polymorphism in Brood Parasites and Their Hosts: Adaptation and Evolution

  • Canchao Yang
  • Wei Liang
  • Anders Pape Møller
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

Polymorphism refers to the diversity of clearly distinct phenotypes within biological populations, and it is one of the extraordinary phenomena in biodiversity that is well known in predator–prey interactions. In avian brood parasitism, coevolution between parasites and hosts can also cause evolution of polymorphism because the egg traits of both parties are subject to selection causing mimetic parasite eggs to evolve as a response to host egg rejection, which in turn selects for the evolution of egg polymorphism in hosts, which further promotes egg polymorphism in parasites. Here we review previous studies and demonstrate that (1) egg polymorphism is an adaptation and counteradaptation in both hosts and parasitic cuckoos, (2) egg polymorphism has fitness consequences for both hosts and cuckoos, and (3) egg polymorphism in the cuckoo-host system changes temporally and spatially. Egg polymorphism can evolve as an anti-parasite strategy in cuckoo hosts, and it provides effective defenses to dramatically reduce the success of cuckoo parasitism. However, compared to hosts, egg polymorphism in cuckoos is simply a result of frequency-dependent selection, but not an effective counteradaptation to increase the success of cuckoos. If we consider each cuckoo species as a global population, egg polymorphism is common in most cuckoos. However, egg polymorphism in hosts is much more complex since it changes temporally and varies spatially among populations. It may be explained by the history of the interaction between cuckoos and their hosts and the intensity of selection linked to cuckoo diversity.

Keywords

Avian brood parasitism Coevolution Egg color Egg polymorphism Frequency-dependent selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

M. Soler and D. Sherry provided constructive criticism and helpful suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31672303 and 31260514 to CY, 31272328, 31472013 and 31772453 to WL) and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0761).

References

  1. Banks AJ, Martin TE (2001) Host activity and the risk of nest parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds. Behav Ecol 12:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertram BCR, Burger AE (1981) Are ostrich Struthio camelus eggs the wrong colour? Ibis 123:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen L, Zhu L, Yang X, Lyu N, Liu Y, Liang W, Sun Y (2016) Are egg colors and patterns signs of phylogenetic relatedness in parrotbills? Ornithol Sci 15:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook LM, Dennis RLH, Mani GS (1999) Melanic morph frequency in the peppered moth in the Manchester area. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cott HB (1948) Edibility of the eggs of birds. Nature 161:8–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cott HB (1951) The palatability of the eggs of birds: illustrated by experiments on the food preferences of the hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus). J Zool 121:1–41Google Scholar
  7. Cott HB (1953) The palatability of the eggs of birds: illustrated by experiments on the food preferences of the ferret (Putorius furo) and cat (Felis catus); with notes on other egg-eating carnivora. J Zool 123:123–141Google Scholar
  8. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T & A. D. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies NB, de Brooke ML (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol 58:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis SK (2005) Nest-site selection patterns and the influence of vegetation on nest survival of mixed-grass prairie passerines. Condor 107:605–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ford EB (1965) Genetic polymorphism. Faber & Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Forstmeier W, Weiss I (2004) Adaptive plasticity in nest-site selection in response to changing predation risk. Oikos 104:487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galeotti P, Rubolini D (2004) The niche variation hypothesis and the evolution of colour polymorphism in birds: a comparative study of owls, nightjars and raptors. Biol J Linn Soc 82:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galeotti P, Rubolini D, Dunn PO, Fasola D (2003) Colour polymorphism in birds: causes and functions. J Evol Biol 16:635–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Götmark F (1992) Blue eggs do not reduce nest predation in the song thrush, Turdus philomelos. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilner RM (2006) The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol Rev 81:383–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Krüger O (2011) Brood parasitism selects for no defence in a cuckoo host. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2777–2783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lahti DC (2005) Evolution of bird eggs in the absence of cuckoo parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18057–18062CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM (2003) Escalation of a co-evolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature 422:157–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee WS, Kwon YS, Yoo JC (2010) Egg survival is related to the colour matching of eggs to nest background in black-tailed gulls. J Ornithol 151:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leimar O (2005) The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versus evolutionary branching. Am Nat 165:669–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang W, Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Vikan JR, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Shykoff JA, Møller AP, Takasu F (2012) Modelling the maintenance of egg polymorphism in avian brood parasites and their hosts. J Evol Biol 25:916–929CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Liversidge R (1970) The biology of the Jacobin cuckoo Clamator jacobinus. Ostrich 8(Suppl):117–137Google Scholar
  25. Lovell PG, Ruxton GD, Langridge KV, Spencer KA (2013) Egg-laying substrate selection for optimal camouflage by quail. Curr Biol 23:260–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lowther PE (2013) Host list of avian brood parasites – 2 – Cuculiformes – old world cuckoos. Field Museum, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  27. Magurran AE (2010) Q & A: what is biodiversity? BMC Biol 8:145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin TE, Roper JJ (1988) Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the hermit thrush. Condor 90:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montevecchi WA (1976) Field experiments on the adaptive significance of avian eggshell pigmentation. Behaviour 58:26–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moreno J, Osorno JL (2003) Avian egg colour and sexual selection: does eggshell pigmentation reflect female condition and genetic quality? Ecol Lett 6:803–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patten MA, Dan LR, Wolfe DH (2011) Hierarchical cues in brood parasite nest selection. J Ornithol 152:521–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao MS, Thorgeirsson S, Reddy MK, Lalwani ND, Evarts RE, Usman MI, Singh B, Reddy JK (1993) Observations of pigment accumulation in the epithelium of the shell gland and superficial pigmentation on the egg shell in Japanese quail. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ 38:73–80Google Scholar
  33. Roulin A (2004) The evolution, maintenance and adaptive function of genetic colour polymorphism in birds. Biol Rev 79:815–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Soler M (2014) Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev 89:688–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Soler JJ, Aviles JM, Soler M, Møller AP (2003) Evolution of host egg mimicry in a brood parasite, the great spotted cuckoo. Biol J Linn Soc 79:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soler M, Pérez-Contreras T (2012) Location of suitable nests by great spotted cuckoos: an empirical and experimental study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1305–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Solis JC, de Lope F (1995) Nest and egg crypsis in the ground-nesting stone curlew Burhinus oedicnemus. J Avian Biol 26:135–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stoddard MC, Kupán K, Eyster HN, Rojas-Abreu W, Cruz-López M, Serrano-Meneses MA, Küpper C (2016) Camouflage and clutch survival in plovers and terns. Sci Rep 6:32059CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Swynnerton CFM (1916) On the coloration of the mouths and eggs of birds: on the coloration of eggs. Ibis 58:529–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Takasu F (1998) Why do all host species not show defense against avian brood parasitism: evolutionary lag or equilibrium? Am Nat 15:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tinbergen N, Broekhuysen GJ, Feekes F, Houghton JCW, Kruuk H, Szulc E (1962) Egg shell removal by the black-headed gull, Larus ridibundus L: a behavior component of camouflage. Behaviour 19:74–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2002) Adaptive significance of egg colouration. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation: behaviour, environment and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–289Google Scholar
  43. Vikan JR, Fossøy F, Huhta E, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Outcomes of brood parasite–host interactions mediated by egg matching: common cuckoos, Cuculus canorus versus Fringilla finches. PLoS One 6:604–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang L, Liang W, Yang C, Cheng SJ, Hsu YC, Lu X (2016) Egg rejection and clutch phenotype variation in the plain prinia Prinia inornata. J Avian Biol 47:788–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weidinger K (2001) Does egg colour affect predation rate on open passerine nests? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang C, Liang W, Cai Y, Shi S, Takasu F, Møller AP, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2010) Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host. PLoS One 5:e10816CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Cai Y, Shi S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Møller AP, Liang W, Grim T (2013) Host selection in parasitic birds: are open-cup nesting insectivorous passerines always suitable cuckoo hosts? J Avian Biol 44:216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang C, Liu Y, Zeng L, Liang W (2014) Egg color variation, but not egg rejection behavior, changes in a cuckoo host breeding in the absence of brood parasitism. Ecol Evol 4:2239–2246CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang C, Wang L, Cheng SJ, Hsu YC, Stokke BG, Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Liang W, Møller AP (2015a) Deficiency in egg rejection in a host species as a response to the absence of brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 26:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang C, Su T, Liang W, Møller AP (2015b) Coevolution between the large hawk-cuckoo (Cuculus sparverioides) and its two sympatric Leiothrichidae hosts: evidence for recent expansion and switch in host use? Biol J Linn Soc 115:919–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang C, Wang L, Chen M, Liang W, Møller AP (2015c) Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang C, Huang Q, Wang L, Jiang A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Tunheim OH, Røskaft E, Liang W, Møller AP (2016a) Plaintive cuckoos do not select tailorbird hosts that match the phenotypes of their own eggs. Behav Ecol 27:835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP (2016b) Egg recognition as anti-parasitism defense in hosts does not select for laying of matching eggs in parasitic cuckoos. Anim Behav 122:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang C, Li Z, Zhang Y, Wang H, Liang W, Møller AP (2016c) Egg polymorphism and egg discrimination in the Daurian redstart Phoenicurus auroreus, a host of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Ornithol Sci 15:127–132Google Scholar
  56. Yang C, Liang W, Møller AP (2017) Why do hosts with obvious egg polymorphism suffer low parasitism rates under avian brood parasitism? A theoretical consideration. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life SciencesHainan Normal UniversityHaikouP. R. China
  2. 2.Ecologie Systématique EvolutionUniversité Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayOrsay CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations