Advertisement

AODVv2: Performance vs. Loop Freedom

  • Mojgan Kamali
  • Massimo Merro
  • Alice Dal Corso
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10706)

Abstract

We compare two evolutions of the Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol, i.e. DYMO and AODVv2-16. In particular, we apply statistical model checking to investigate the performance of these two protocols in terms of routes established and looping routes. Our modelling and analysis are carried out by the Uppaal Statistical Model Checker on 3\(\,\times \,\)3 grids, with possibly lossy communication.

References

  1. 1.
    Battisti, L., Macedonio, D., Merro, M.: Statistical model checking of a clock synchronization protocol for sensor networks. In: Arbab, F., Sirjani, M. (eds.) FSEN 2013. LNCS, vol. 8161, pp. 168–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40213-5_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behrmann, G., David, A., Larsen, K.G.: A tutorial on Uppaal. In: Bernardo, M., Corradini, F. (eds.) SFM-RT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3185, pp. 200–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30080-9_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benetti, D., Merro, M., Viganò, L.: Model checking ad hoc network routing protocols: ARAN vs. endairA. In: SEFM 2010, pp. 191–202. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhargavan, K., Obradovic, D., Gunter, C.A.: Formal verification of standards for distance vector routing protocols. J. ACM 49(4), 538–576 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bres, E., van Glabbeek, R., Höfner, P.: A timed process algebra for wireless networks with an application in routing. In: Thiemann, P. (ed.) ESOP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9632, pp. 95–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49498-1_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke Jr., E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dal Corso, A., Macedonio, D., Merro, M.: Statistical model checking of Ad Hoc routing protocols in lossy grid networks. In: Havelund, K., Holzmann, G., Joshi, R. (eds.) NFM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9058, pp. 112–126. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17524-9_9 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikuăionis, M., Poulsen, D.B.: Uppaal SMC tutorial. STTT 17(4), 397–415 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fehnker, A., van Glabbeek, R., Höfner, P., McIver, A., Portmann, M., Tan, W.L.: Automated analysis of AODV using UPPAAL. In: Flanagan, C., König, B. (eds.) TACAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7214, pp. 173–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28756-5_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fehnker, A., van Glabbeek, R.J., Höfner, P., McIver, A., Portmann, M., Tan, W.L.: A process algebra for wireless mesh networks used for modelling, verifying and analysing AODV. CoRR abs/1312.7645 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J.: A unified approach to loop-free routing using distance vectors or link states. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 19(4), 212–223 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J., Rangarajan, H.: A new framework for loop-free on-demand routing using destination sequence numbers. In: MASS 2004, pp. 426–435. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Glabbeek, R., Höfner, P., Portmann, M., Tan, W.L.: Modelling and verifying the AODV routing protocol. Distrib. Comput. 29(4), 279–315 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Glabbeek, R., Höfner, P., Tan, W.L., Portmann, M.: Sequence numbers do not guarantee loop freedom: AODV can yield routing loops. In: MSWiM 2013, pp. 91–100. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Höfner, P., McIver, A.: Statistical model checking of wireless mesh routing protocols. In: Brat, G., Rungta, N., Venet, A. (eds.) NFM 2013. LNCS, vol. 7871, pp. 322–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38088-4_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kamali, M., Merro, M., Dal Corso, A.: AODVv2: performance vs. loop freedom. Technical report. pp. 1177. TUCS - Turku Centre for Computer Science (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamali, M., Höfner, P., Kamali, M., Petre, L.: Formal analysis of proactive, distributed routing. In: Calinescu, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) SEFM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9276, pp. 175–189. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22969-0_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Merro, M., Ballardin, F., Sibilio, E.: A timed calculus for wireless systems. TCS 412(47), 6585–6611 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miskovic, S., Knightly, E.W.: Routing primitives for wireless mesh networks: design, analysis and experiments. In: INFOCOM 2010, pp. 1–9. IEEE Press (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Namjoshi, K.S., Trefler, R.J.: Loop freedom in AODVv2. In: Graf, S., Viswanathan, M. (eds.) FORTE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9039, pp. 98–112. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19195-9_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., Das, S.: Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) Routing. RFC 3561 (Experimental) (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perkins, C., Stan, R., Dowdell, J.: Dynamic MANET on-demand (AODVv2) Routing draft-ietf-manet-dymo. Internet Draft 26 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perkins, C., Stan, R., Dowdell, J., Steenbrink, L., Mercieca, V.: Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODVv2) Routing draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2. Internet Draft 11 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perkins, C., Stan, R., Dowdell, J., Steenbrink, L., Mercieca, V.: Dynamic MANET On-demand (AODVv2) Routing draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2. Internet Draft 16 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sen, K., Viswanathan, M., Agha, G.A.: Vesta: a statistical model-checker and analyzer for probabilistic systems. In: QEST 2005, pp. 251–252. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yousefi, B., Ghassemi, F., Khosravi, R.: Modeling and efficient verification of wireless ad hoc networks. CoRR abs/1604.07179 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and EngineeringÅbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations