Advertisement

Retail Crime pp 405-423 | Cite as

Practical Challenges and New Research Frontiers in Retail Crime and Its Prevention

  • Vania Ceccato
  • Rachel Armitage
Chapter
Part of the Crime Prevention and Security Management book series (CPSM)

Abstract

This chapter summarises the main findings of this edited volume and discusses the practical challenges and new research frontiers in retail crime and its prevention. This final chapter is composed of four parts: a summary of the results, the cross-cutting common themes, the book limitations and a future research agenda linked to policy recommendations. The chapter first synthesises and critically reviews the key findings, identifying some of the most important lessons learnt by contributors coming from a variety of backgrounds and identifying the relevant challenges. Then, it outlines the future research in retail crime and provides a number of suggestions for policy recommendations that are linked to different issues of retail.

Keywords

The impact of retail crime Role of technology ORC Retail crime prevention 

References

  1. Bamfield, J. (2012). Shopping and Crime. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamfield, J. (Ed.). (2014). Security and Risk Management (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. (2016). Amplifying Risk in Retail Stores: The Evidence to Date on Making Shop Thieves Think Twice. Bruxelles: AnchorPrint.Google Scholar
  4. Bowers, K. (2014). Risky Facilities: Crime Radiators or Crime Absorbers? A Comparison of Internal and External Levels of Theft. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(3), 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1995). Criminality of Place: Crime Generators and Crime Attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardone, C., & Hayes, R. (2012). Shoplifter Perceptions of Store Environments: An Analysis of How Physical Cues in the Retail Interior Shape Shoplifter Behavior. Journal of Applied Security Research, 71(1), 22–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmel-Gilfilen, C. (2011). Advancing Retail Security Design: Uncovering Shoplifter Perceptions of the Physical Environment. Journal of Interior Design, 36, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, R. V. (1992). Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, R. V. (1999). Hot Products: Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing Demand for Stolen Goods, Police Research Series Paper, 112. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, R. V., & Petrossian, G. (2013). Shoplifting, Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. Washington, DC: COPS office.Google Scholar
  11. Eck, J. E. (1994). Drug Markets and Drug Places: A Case-Control Study of the Spatial Structure of Illicit Drug Dealing. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  12. Felson, M. (1986). Routine Activities, Social Controls, Rational Decisions, and Criminal Outcomes. In D. Cornish & R. V. G. Clarke (Eds.), The Reasoning Criminal. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (2010). Routine Precautions, Criminology and Crime Prevention. In H. Barlow & S. Decker (Eds.), Crime and Public Policy (pp. 106–120). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gill, M. (2000). Commercial Robbery: Offenders’ Perspectives on Security and Crime Prevention. London: Perpetuity Press.Google Scholar
  15. GRTB – Global Retail Theft Barometer. (2016). Global Retail Theft Barometer 2014–2015. Retrieved September 10, 2017, from www.GlobalRetailTheftBarometer.com
  16. Laub, J. H. (2011). Translational Criminology. Washington, DC: NIJ. Retrieved November 4, 2017, from https://www.nij.gov/about/speeches/Pages/laub-translational-criminology-3-1-2011.aspx
  17. Pease, K. (2001). Cracking Crime through Design. London: Design Council Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Roman, J., & Farrell, G. (2002). Cost-Benefit Analysis for Crime Prevention: Opportunity Costs, Routine Savings and Crime Externalities. Crime Prevention Studies, 14, 53–92.Google Scholar
  19. Wikström, P.-O., Ceccato, V., Hardie, B., & Treiber, K. (2010). Activity Fields and the Dynamics of Crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 55–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vania Ceccato
    • 1
  • Rachel Armitage
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Urban Planning and Built EnvironmentKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Secure Societies InstituteUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations