Skip to main content

Effects of Spatiality on Value-Sensitive Decisions Made by Robot Swarms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics ((SPAR,volume 6))

Abstract

Value-sensitive decision-making is an essential task for organisms at all levels of biological complexity and consists of choosing options among a set of alternatives and being rewarded according to the quality value of the chosen option. Provided that the chosen option has an above-threshold quality value, value-sensitive decisions are particularly relevant in case not all of the possible options are available at decision time. This means that the decision-maker may refrain from deciding until a sufficient-quality option becomes available. Value-sensitive collective decisions are interesting for swarm robotics when the options are dispersed in space (e.g., resources in a foraging problem), and may be discovered at different times. However, current design methodologies for collective decision-making often assume a well-mixed system, and clever design workarounds are suggested to deal with a heterogeneous distribution of opinions within the swarm (e.g., due to spatial constraints on the interaction network). Here, we quantify the effects of spatiality in a value-sensitive decision problem involving a swarm of 150 kilobots. We present a macroscopic model of value-sensitive decision-making inspired by house-hunting honeybees, and implement a solution for both a multiagent system and a kilobot swarm. Notably, no workaround is implemented to deal with the spatial distribution of opinions within the swarm. We show how the dynamics presented by the robotic system match or depart from the model predictions in both a qualitative and quantitative way as a result of spatial constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdy5o18y5lg and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJtcpuj1Q5o.

References

  1. Amé, J.M., Halloy, J., Rivault, C., Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L.: Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103(15), 5835–5840 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baronchelli, A., Dall’Asta, L., Barrat, A., Loreto, V.: Topology-induced coarsening in language games. Phys. Rev. E, Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 73(1), 015,102 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berman, S., Kumar, V., Nagpal, R.: Design of control policies for spatially inhomogeneous robot swarms with application to commercial pollination. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 378–385. IEEE Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Correll, N., Martinoli, A.: Collective inspection of regular structures using a swarm of miniature robots. In: The 9th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER) (Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics), vol. 21, pp. 375–385. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dimidov, C., Oriolo, G., Trianni, V.: Random walks in swarm robotics: an experiment with kilobots. In: Dorigo, M. et al. (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Swarm Intelligence (ANTS 2016). LNCS, vol. 9882, pp. 185–196. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franks, N.R., Hardcastle, K.A., Collins, S., Smith, F.D., Sullivan, K.M., Robinson, E.J., Sendova-Franks, A.B.: Can ant colonies choose a far-and-away better nest over an in-the-way poor one? Anim. Behav. 76(2), 323–334 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garnier, S., Jost, C., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Caprari, G., Jeanson, R., Grimal, A., Theraulaz, G.: The embodiment of cockroach aggregation behavior in a group of micro-robots. Artif. Life 14(4), 387–408 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillespie, D.T., Hellander, A., Petzold, L.R.: Perspective: stochastic algorithms for chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 138(17), 170,901–170,915 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamann, H., Wörn, H.: A framework of spacetime continuous models for algorithm design in swarm robotics. Swarm Intell. 2(2–4), 209–239 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kloeden, P.E., Platen, E.: Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability, vol. 23. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: Mathematical model of foraging in a group of robots: effect of interference. Auton. Robot. 13(2), 127–141 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Luke, S., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Panait, L., Sullivan, K., Balan, G.: Mason: a multiagent simulation environment. Simulation 81(7), 517–527 (2005). Transactions of the society for Modeling and Simulation International

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinoli, A., Easton, K., Agassounon, W.: Modeling swarm robotic systems: a case study in collaborative distributed manipulation. Int. J. Robot. Res. 23(4), 415–436 (2004). Special Issue on Experimental Robotics, Siciliano, B. (ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael, N., Kumar, V.: Control of ensembles of aerial robots. Proc. IEEE 99(9), 1587–1602 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Montes, M., Ferrante, E., Scheidler, A., Pinciroli, C., Birattari, M., Dorigo, M.: Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: a mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making. Swarm Intell. 5(3–4), 305–327 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moretti, P., Liu, S., Baronchelli, A., Pastor-Satorras, R.: Heterogenous mean-field analysis of a generalized voter-like model on networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 85(3), 1–6 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pais, D., Hogan, P.M., Schlegel, T., Franks, N.R., Leonard, N.E., Marshall, J.A.R.: A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making. PLoS ONE 8(9), e73,216 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pirrone, A., Stafford, T., Marshall, J.A.R.: When natural selection should optimise speed-accuracy trade-offs. Front. Neurosci. 8(73) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prorok, A., Corell, N., Martinoli, A.: Multi-level spatial modeling for stochastic distributed robotic systems. Int. J. Robot. Res. 30(5), 574–589 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reina, A., Miletitch, R., Dorigo, M., Trianni, V.: A quantitative micro-macro link for collective decisions: the shortest path discovery/selection example. Swarm Intell. 9(2–3), 75–102 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reina, A., Valentini, G., Fernández-Oto, C., Dorigo, M., Trianni, V.: A design pattern for decentralised decision making. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0140,950 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reina, A., Marshall, J.A.R., Trianni, V., Bose, T.: Model of the best-of-N nest-site selection process in honeybees. Phys. Rev. E. 95(5), 052411 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rubenstein, M., Ahler, C., Hoff, N., Cabrera, A., Nagpal, R.: Kilobot: a low cost robot with scalable operations designed for collective behaviors. Robot. Auton. Syst. 62(7), 966–975 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seeley, T.D., Visscher, P.K., Schlegel, T., Hogan, P.M., Franks, N.R., Marshall, J.A.R.: Stop signals provide cross inhibition in collective decision-making by honeybee swarms. Science 335(6064), 108–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Trianni, V., De Simone, D., Reina, A., Baronchelli, A.: Emergence of consensus in a multi-robot network: from abstract models to empirical validation. IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett. PP(99), 1–1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Collective decision with 100 kilobots: speed versus accuracy in binary discrimination problems. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 30(3), 553–580 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Valentini, G., Hamann, H.: Time-variant feedback processes in collective decision-making systems: influence and effect of dynamic neighborhood sizes. Swarm Intell. 9(2–3), 153–176 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the European Research Council through the ERC Consolidator Grant “DiODe: Distributed Algorithms for Optimal Decision-Making” (contract 647704). Vito Trianni acknowledges support from the project DICE (FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant, ID: 631297). Finally, the authors thank Michael Port for the valuable help in building the infrastructure necessary to conduct the robot experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreagiovanni Reina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reina, A., Bose, T., Trianni, V., Marshall, J.A.R. (2018). Effects of Spatiality on Value-Sensitive Decisions Made by Robot Swarms. In: Groß, R., et al. Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73008-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73008-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73006-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73008-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics