Advertisement

From ‘Dimensional Effects’ to Digital 3D Cinema

  • Yong Liu
Chapter

Abstract

By combing through the short history of theatrically released stereoscopic cinema and a series of literature contributions from other scholars across decades, I illustrate the aesthetic transformations that have shaped 3D from the previous booms to its current digital incarnation. I focus on the relationship between spectacle and narrative, and also consider the concept of ‘realism’ and discuss its complex connotations within different historical contexts and their impact on the relationship of spectacle and narrative. Based on such discussion, I develop a description of digital 3D cinema’s unique regime of ‘stereoscopic hyperrealism,’ considering stereoscopy alongside digital technologies and processes such as CGI, VFX and HFR. This overview sets up a historical and aesthetic framework for my subsequent discussion of contemporary 3D cinematic narrative and aesthetics.

References

  1. Barnes, B. (2011, December 25). A year of disappointment at the movie box office. New York Times Online. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/26/business/media/a-year-of-disappointment-for-hollywood.html
  2. Belton, J. (2012). Digital 3D cinema: Digital cinema’s missing novelty phase. Film History, 24(2), 187–195. https://digitalturn.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/24-2-belton.pdf.
  3. Bordwell, D. (1986). Classical Hollywood cinema: Narrational principles and procedures. In P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, apparatus, ideology (pp. 17–34). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buscombe, E. (1985). Sound and color. In B. Nichols (Ed.), Movies and methods (Vol. II, pp. 83–92). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Daley, G. (2012, December). 3D camera supervisor of ‘The Hobbit’ talks high frame rates. 3D Focus Website.Google Scholar
  6. Eisenstein, S. (2013). On stereocinema (1947). In D. Adler, J. Marchessault, & S. Obradovic (Eds.), 3D cinema and beyond (pp. 20–59). Toronto: Public Books.Google Scholar
  7. Elsaesser, T. (2013, Winter). The ‘return’ of 3-D: On some of the logics and genealogies of the image in the twenty-first century. Critical Inquiry, 39(2), 217–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gunning, T. (1986). The cinema of attraction(s): Early film, its spectator and the avant-garde. Wide Angle, 8(3–4), 63–70.Google Scholar
  9. Higgins, S. (2012). 3D in depth: Coraline, Hugo, and a sustainable aesthetic. Film History, 24(2), 196–209. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/479268.
  10. Jackson, P. (2013, December 5). The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, production diary #13 [YouTube]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tv1imkOqHZ8&list=PLxEb7OJne0_cKWPIF8srU4D-SReVF-ybn
  11. Jockenhövel, J. (2011). What is it if it’s not real? It’s genre – Early color film and digital 3D. Cinemascope: Independent Film Journal, 7, 15, (14 pages). http://www.cinemascope.it/Issue%2015/PDF/jockenhovel.pdf
  12. King, G. (2002). New Hollywood cinema: An introduction. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  13. Knorr, S., Ide, K., Kunter, M., & Sikora, T. (2012). The avoidance of visual discomfort and basic rules for producing ‘good 3D’ pictures. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, 121(7), 72–79.  https://doi.org/10.5594/j18236XY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laforet, V. (2012, December 19). The Hobbit: An unexpected masterclass in why HFR fails, and a reaffirmation of what makes cinema magical [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2012/12/19/the-hobbit-an-unexpected-masterclass-in-why-hfr-fails-and-a-reaffirmation-of-what-makes-cinema-magical/
  15. Leotta, A. (2016). Peter Jackson. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McClean, S. T. (2007). Digital storytelling: The narrative power of digital effects in film. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. O’Brien, C. (2005). Cinema’s conversion to sound: Technology and film style in France and the U.S. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Paul, W. (1993). The aesthetic of emergence. Film History: An International Journal, 5(3), 321–355 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3815145.Google Scholar
  19. Pierson, M. (2002). Special effects: Still in search of wonder. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Purse, L. (2013). Digital imaging in popular cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rooney, D. (2016, October 14). Ang Lee pushes cinematic boundaries in this dramastarring newcomer Joe Alwyn as an Iraq War hero caught up in a head-spinning whirl of prepackaged patriotism (The Hollywood Reporter Website). Retrieved from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/billy-lynns-long-halftime-walk-938601
  22. Ross, M. (2012, Winter). The 3-D aesthetic: Avatar and hyperhaptic visuality. Screen, 53(4), 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross, M. (2013, August 19). Miriam Ross research provocation: Post-production conversions, the ugly, the bad and the good. http://www.stereoscopicmedia.org.
  24. Ross, M. (2015). 3D cinema: Optical illusions and tactile experiences. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross, S. (2012). Invitation to the voyage: The flight sequence in contemporary 3D cinema. Film History, 24(2), 210–220.  https://doi.org/10.1353/fih.2012.0010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandifer, P. (2011, Spring). Out of the screen and into the theater: 3-D film as demo. Cinema Journal, 50(3), 62–78.  https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2011.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schilowitz, T. (2012, December). ‘Be open minded’ says Schilowitz from RED about HFR 3D. 3D Focus Website.Google Scholar
  28. Stolworthy, J. (2016, November 2). James Cameron wants you to watch Avatar 2, 3, 4, and 5 in 3D – minus the glasses. The Independent Website. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/james-cameron-avatar-sequels-release-date-in-3d-glasses-a7392971
  29. Sylwan, S., MacDonald, D., & Walter, J. (2009). Stereoscopic CG camera rigs and associated metadata for cinematic production. SPIE DIGITAL LIBRARY SPIE-IS&T/, 7237, 72370C–3.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.823457.
  30. Turnock, J. (2013, Spring-Fall). Removing the pane of glass: The Hobbit, 3D high frame rate filmmaking, and the rhetoric of digital convergence. Film Criticism, 37(3), 30–59.Google Scholar
  31. Voronov, A., Vatolin, D., Sumin, D., Napadovsky, V., & Borisov, A. (2013, March). Methodology of stereoscopic motion picture quality assessment. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXIV, 8648.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2008485.
  32. Webb, B. (2015, May 20). Revealed: the 3D sex odyssey set to scandalise Cannes. The Telegraph Website. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/love/gaspar-noe-3d-sex-cast-cannes/
  33. Zettl, H. (2012). Why 3D may work occasionally: Case reopened. Visual Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang, L., Vázquez, C., & Knorr, S. (2011). 3D-TV content creation: Automatic 2D-to-3D video conversion. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 57(2), 372–383.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2011.2122930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zone, R. (2007). Stereoscopic cinema and the origins of 3-D film, 1838–1952. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zone, R. (2012). 3-D revolution: The history of modern stereoscopic cinema. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUniversiti Brunei DarussalamBandar Seri BegawanBrunei Darussalam

Personalised recommendations