Advertisement

Chase, No Straighter: COLREG Compliant Anti-collision Manoeuvres for Crossing Situations

  • Kjell Ivar ØvergårdEmail author
  • Marius Stian Tannum
  • Per Haavardtun
  • Jens Kristian Berg Syversen
Conference paper

Abstract

The interaction between autonomous vessels and humans is a problem which has not clearly been addressed. One solution for this is that autonomous vessels implement rules and algorithms that mimics the behaviour of trained seafarers that acts in accordance with the International Maritime Collision Regulations (COLREGS). We suggest a simple algorithm that ’chases’ the tangent point of the Circle of Rejection that is set outside other vessels. The algorithm utilises the same information that would be used by a human navigator—and it uses this information to guide an autonomous vessel in a way that will satisfy COLREG Rule 8 which requires anti-collision manoeuvres to be positive, timely and with regard to good seamanship.

Keywords

COLREGS Robotic sailing Anti-collision Navigation 

References

  1. 1.
    Alves, J.C., and N.A. Cruz. 2016. Ais-enabled collision avoidance strategies for autonomous sailboats. In Robotic sailing 2015, 77–87. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alves, J.C., and N.A. Cruz. 2016. Robotic sailing 2016: Proceedings of the 9th international robotic sailing conference, Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjamin, M., J. Curcio, J. Leonard, and P. Newman. 2006. Protocol-based colregs collision avoidance navigation between unmanned marine surface craft. Journal of Field Robotics 23:5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benjamin, M.R., and J.A. Curcio. 2004. Colregs-based navigation of autonomous marine vehicles. In Autonomous underwater vehicles, 2004 IEEE/OES 32–39. IEEE.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benjamin, M.R., J.A. Curcio, J.J. Leonard, and P.M. Newman. 2006. Navigation of unmanned marine vehicles in accordance with the rules of the road. In Robotics and automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference, 3581–3587, IEEE.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campbell, S., and W. Naeem. 2012. A rule-based heuristic method for colregs-compliant collision avoidance for an unmanned surface vehicle. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 45(27): 386–391.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christ, P.F., F. Lachner, A. Hösl, B. Menze, K. Diepold, and A. Butz. 2016. Human-drone-interaction: A case study to investigate the relation between autonomy and user experience. In European conference on computer vision, 238–253, Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cruz, N.A., and J.C. Alves. 2008. Autonomous sailboats: An emerging technology for ocean sampling and surveillance. In OCEANS 2008, 1–6. IEEE.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Dokkum, K. 2007. A fully illustrated textbook: The COLREGS Guide. DOKMAR.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IMO. 1972. Convention on the International Regulations for preventing collision at sea (COLREGs). International Maritime Organisation.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levander, O. 2017. Autonomous ships on the high seas. IEEE Spectrum 54 (2): 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naeem, W., and G.W. Irwin. 2011. Evasive decision making in uninhabited maritime vehicles. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 44 (1): 12833–12838.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Øvergård, K.I., S. Nazir, and A.S. Solberg. 2017. Towards automated performance assessment for maritime navigation. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation 11 (2): 43–48.  https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.11.02.03.
  14. 14.
    Porathe, T., J. Prison, and Y. Man. 2014. Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships. In Proceedings of human factors in ship design & operation, p. 93, Feb 26–27, London, UK.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Savvaris, A., H. Niu, H. Oh, and A. Tsourdos. 2014. Development of collision avoidance algorithms for the c-enduro usv. In Proceedings of the 19th IFAC world congress (IFAC 2014), vol. 47, 12174–12181.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stenman, A., and S. Öhland. 2017. Interaction between unmanned vessels and colregs. Yrkeshögskolan Novia: Tech. rep.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolf, I. 2016. The interaction between humans and autonomous agents. In Autonomous driving, 103–124. Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjell Ivar Øvergård
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marius Stian Tannum
    • 1
  • Per Haavardtun
    • 1
  • Jens Kristian Berg Syversen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Maritime Operations (KIØ, PH, JBKS), Department of Microsystems (MST)University College of Southeast NorwayBorreNorway

Personalised recommendations