Advertisement

Preoperative Assessment of the Patient for the Planned Position

  • C. Wayne Hamm
  • Jaafar Basma
Chapter

Abstract

Preanesthesia evaluation, which we define as the process of clinical assessment preceding the delivery of anesthesia care for surgery and nonsurgical procedures, is an essential component of basic anesthetic practice. This evaluation includes assessing anesthetic risks associated with the patient’s medical conditions, therapies, alternative treatments, surgical, and other procedures as well as assessing options for anesthetic techniques. The benefits of a preanesthesia evaluation include, but are not limited to, greater safety in perioperative care, optimal resource use, improved outcomes, and increased patient satisfaction. In this chapter, we will confine our discussion of the preanesthesia evaluation to the assessment of the patient’s tolerance of the position required for the anticipated neurosurgical procedure.

Keywords

Preanesthesia evaluation Supine position Lateral position Sitting position Prone position 

References

  1. 1.
    Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Practice for preanesthesia evaluation an updated report by the society of anesthesiologists task force on preanesthesia evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(1):8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shih P, Slimack N, Roy A, Fessler R, Koski T. Abdominal complications following posterior spinal fusion in patients with previous abdominal surgeries. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(4):e16–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grisell M, Place H. Face tissue pressure in prone positioning. Spine. 2008;33(26):2938–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leibovitch I, Casson RLC, Selva D. Ischemic orbital compartment syndrome as complication of spinal surgery in the prone position. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(1):105–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stambough J, Dolan D, Werner R, Godfrey E. Ophthalmologic complications associated with prone positioning in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(3):156–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singer M, Salim S. Bilateral acute angle-closure glaucoma as a complication of facedown spine surgery. Spine J. 2010;10:e7–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwee MM, Ho YH, Rozen WM. The prone position during surgery and its complications: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Int Surg. 2015;100(2):292–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderton J, Keen R, Neave R. Positioning in the surgical patient. London: Butterworths; 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Porter J, Pidgeon C, Cunningham A. The sitting position in neurosurgery: a critical appraisal. Br J Anesth. 1999;82(1):117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Black S, Cucchiara RF. Tumor surgery. In: Cucchiara RF, Black S, Michenfelder JD, editors. Clinical neuroanesthesia. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p. 351.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weinlander CM, Coombs DW, Plume SK. Myocardial ischemia due to obstruction of aortocoronary bypass graft by intraoperative positioning. Anesth Analg. 1985;64:933–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickman CA, Crawford NR, Brantley AGU, Sonntag VKH, Koeneman JB. In vitro cervical spine biomechanical testing. BNI Quarterly. 1993;9:17–26.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rojas CA, Bertozzi JC, Martinez CR, Whitlow J. Reassessment of the craniocervical junction: normal values on CT. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1819–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhoton AL Jr. The far lateral approach and its transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions. Neurosurgery. 2000;87:555–85.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dickamn CA, Greene KA, Sonntag VK. Injuries involving the transverse atlantal ligament: classification and treatment guidelines based upon experience with 39 injuries. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levine AM, Edwards CC. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67A:217–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983;8:817–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA Jr, et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine. 2007;32:2365–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Torg JS, Naranja RJ, Pavlov H, Galinat BJ, Warren R, Stine RA. The relationship of developmental narrowing of the cervical spinal canal to reversible and irreversible injury of the cervical spinal cord in football players. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78A:1308–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, et al. Aging of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:706–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee SH, Kim KT, Suk KS, Lee JH, Shin JH, So DH, et al. Asymptomatic cervical cord compression in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a whole spine magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:2057–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dagi TF, Tarkington MA, Leech JJ. Tandem lumbar and cervical stenosis: natural history, prognostic indicices, and results after surgical decompression. J Neurosurg. 1987;66:842–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teng P, Papatheodorou C. Combined cervical and lumbar spondylosis. Arch Neurol. 1964;10:298–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(8):1178–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Epstein NE, Epstein JA, Carras R, Murthy VS, Hyman RA. Coexisting cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery. 1984;15:489–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Caron TH, Gordon RB. Combined (tandem) lumbar and cervical stenosis. Semin Spine Surg. 2007;19:44–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heiss JD, Oldfield EH. Pathophysiology and treatment of syringomyelia. Contemp Neurosurg. 2003;25:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wroski M, Ferber J, Wroski J. Acute tension pneumocephalus as a complication of surgical procedures of the posterior cranial fossa in prone position. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1987;21:167–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Wayne Hamm
    • 1
  • Jaafar Basma
    • 2
  1. 1.Medical Anesthesia GroupGermantownUSA
  2. 2.University of Tennessee Health Sciences CenterMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations