Open Posterior Approaches for Femoral Hernia Repair

  • Frederik BerrevoetEmail author


As open preperitoneal techniques had their revival during the recent decade, femoral hernias can quite easily be managed by an open posterior approach as well. Historically, many of the nowadays more popular open posterior techniques have been described in detail by predecessors as McEvedy, Lloyd Nyhus, George Wantz, and René Stoppa. Most of them were meant for treatment of inguinal hernias, but over time the open preperitoneal techniques were used for femoral hernia repair as well.

Currently, several posterior techniques are being used worldwide with all their specifics and different types of meshes. These techniques are all quite similar from an anatomical point of view, all aiming for a solid reinforcement of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and the transversalis fascia and covering all orifices of Fruchaud’s myopectineum, including the femoral canal.

In this chapter different open preperitoneal mesh repairs will be described and discussed. The current literature will be reviewed shortly.


  1. 1.
    Annandale T. Case in which a reducible oblique and direct inguinal and femoral hernia existed on the same side and were successfully treated by operation. Edinb Med J. 1876;21:1087.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheatle GL. An operation for the radical cure of inguinal and femoral hernia. Br Med J. 1920;2(3107):68–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henry AK. Operation for femoral hernia by a midline extraperitoneal approach with a preliminary note on the use of this route for reducible inguinal hernia. Lancet. 1936;1:531–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McEvedy PG. Femoral hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1950;7:484–96.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nyhus LM, Condon RE, Harkins HN. Clinical experiences with preperitoneal hernia repair for all types of hernia of the groin. Am J Surg. 1960;100:234–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JP, Verhaeghe PJ, Delattre JF. The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am. 1984;64(2):269–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kugel RD. Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorraphy. Am J Surg. 1999;178:298–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pélissier EP, Monek O, Blum D, Ngo P. The Polysoft patch: prospective evaluation of feasibility, postoperative pain and recovery. Hernia. 2007;11(3):229–34. Epub 2007 Feb 15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berrevoet F, Sommeling C, De Gendt S, Breusegem C, de Hemptinne B. The preperitoneal memory-ring patch for inguinal hernia: a prospective multicentric feasibility study. Hernia. 2009;13(3):243–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berrevoet F, Vanlander A, Bontinck J, Troisi RI. Open preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernias using a mesh with nitinol memory frame. Hernia. 2013;17(3):365–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akkersdijk WL, Andeweg CS, Bökkerink WJ, Lange JF, van Laarhoven CJ, Koning GG. Teaching the transrectus sheath preperiotneal mesh repair: TREPP in 9 steps. Int J Surg. 2016;30:150–4. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandblom G, Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E. Femoral hernias: a register analysis of 588 repairs. Hernia. 1999;3:131–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mikkelsen T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Risk of femoral hernia after inguinal herniorraphy. Br J Surg. 2002;89:486–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andrews NJ. Presentation and outcome of strangulated external hernia in a district general hospital. Br J Surg. 1981;68:329–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;4:CD002197.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dahlstrand U, Wollert S, Nordin P, Sandblom G, Gunnarson U. Emergency femoral hernia repair—a study based on a national register. Ann Surg. 2009;249:672–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chan G, Chan CK. Longterm results of a prospective study of 225 femoral hernia repairs: indications for tissue and mesh repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:360–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weyhe D. New worldwide guidelines for treatment of inguinal hernia: the most important recommendations from HerniaSurge. Chirurg. 2017;88(7):628. [Epub ahead of print] [Article in German].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maillart JF, Vantournhoudt P, Piret-Gerard G, Farghadani H, Mauel E. Transinguinal preperitoneal groin hernia repair using a preperitoneal mesh preformed with a permanent memory ring: a good alternative to Lichtenstein’s technique. Hernia. 2011;15(3):289–95. Epub 2011 Jan 29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koning GG, Koole D, de Jongh MA, de Schipper JP, Verhofstad MH, Oostvogel HJ, Vriens PW. The transinguinal preperitoneal hernia correction vs Lichtenstein’s technique; is TIPP top? Hernia. 2011;15(1):19–22. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver TransplantationGhent University Hospital and Medical SchoolGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations