Advertisement

Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Approach in Inguinal Hernia Repair: The Old and the New

  • Davide Lomanto
  • Eva Lourdes Sta. Clara
Chapter

Abstract

Endoscopic inguinal hernia repair has three surgical approaches from totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair to the transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) and the less common intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM). The first two are widely utilized for the obvious advantages of lower recurrence and complication rates and better outcome when compared to the open repair while covering the entire potential hernia site in the myopectineal orifice with a large prosthesis [1, 2].

References

  1. 1.
    Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1479–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feliu X, Claveria R, Besora P, et al. Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach? Hernia. 2011;15:15–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lomanto D, Katara AN. Managing intraoperative complications during totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. Minim Access Surg. 2006;2:165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simons MP, Aufenacaker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:343–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International EndoHernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2773–843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goo TT, Lawenko M, Cheah WK, Lomanto D. Endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernia: a 5–year review. Hernia. 2010;14:477–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lau H, Lee F. A prospective comparative study of needlescopic and conventional endoscopic TEP hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1737–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goo TT, Goel R, Lawenko M, Lomanto D. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair via a single port. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:389–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, et al. Laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a l5–year single centre experience in Sl7 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1898–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:191–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fung AK, Aly EH. Systematic review of single incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1353–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rehman H, Mathews T, Ahmed I. A review of minimally invasive single port/incision laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22:641–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goo TT, Agarwal A, Goel R, et al. Single-port access adrenalectomy: our initial experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21:815–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goel R, Lomanto D. Controversies in single port surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:380–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fuentes MB, Goel R, Lee-Ong AC, et al. Single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery (SPES) for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia: a critical appraisal of the chopstick repair. Hernia. 2013;17:217–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzy A, et al. Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1356–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tetik C, Arregui ME, Dulucq JL, et al. Complications and recurrences with laparoscopic repair of groin hernias. A multi-institutional retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:1316–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kraus MA. Nerve injury during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:342–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Felix E, Habertson N, Varteian S. Laparoscopic hernioplasty: surgical complications. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:328–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miguel PR, Reusch M, daRosa AL, Carlos JR. Laparoscopic hernia repair—complications. JSLS. 1998;2:35–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cavazzola LT, Rosen MJ. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93:1269–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc. 2015;29:289–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgical CentreYLL School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations